Fideïcomís de residu versus substitució preventiva de residu: la voluntat expressa

El plet que origina la STSJC té per objecte la interpretació de la clàusula testamentària que instituïa hereva a la vídua del causant, subjectant-la, segons la interpretació dels demandants, a un fideïcomís de residu, i segons la demandada, a una substitució preventiva de residu. El TSJC va considerar que el testador havia ordenat un fideïcomís de residu. La qüestió havia estat abordada en diverses ocasions pel Tribunal Suprem, però tan sols existia una sentència del TSJC. Aquesta sentència aplica el mateix criteri que la STSJC 28.10.1991, instaurant així una línia jurisprudencial pròpia.

Cas clínic: esferocitosi hereditaria de diagnóstic tardà

Nena de 10 anys d'edat que procedeix d'un deficient nivell sòcio-cultural, de la qual es desconeixen antecedents paterns. Els materns són anodins. La malaltia actual s'inicia deus dies abans de l'ingrés per un procés intercorrent amb febre i vòmits de tres dies de durada, seguit d'astènia progressiva, mareigs, vòmits i inestabilitat a la marxa. Consulta el nostre servei d'Urgències per agreujament de la simptomatologia i certa desconexió amb l'ambient....

Reparar y sustituir cosas en la compraventa : evolución y últimas tendencias

International texts recognise the buyer's right to the repair or replacement if the goods do not conform with the contract, and at the same time, establish exceptions to their application and certain rules of protection for the seller (Art. 46 CISG, Art. 7.2.3 UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Art.9:102 PECL and Arts. 4:202 y 4:204 (1) PEL S). This approach is a result of a compromise between civil law systems and the common law and it has been widely extended to the regulation of consumer sales over the last decade (Art. 3.3 of the Directive 1999/44/CE, Art. III.-3:302 DCFR, Art. 26 of the proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights). These norms regulate the different ways of requiring the fulfilment of a contractual obligation from a new paradigm which has little to do with a need to protect the weak consumer which governed the origins of consumer policy in the European Community. Now the idea of the consumer who shall behave economically efficiently prevails in Art. 3.3 of the Directive 1999/44/CE, a norm which is clearly influenced by the international texts and whose transposing into the national legislation of Member States has created important problems for traditional dogmas. In this sense there are still some unclear issues, such as the possibility of replacing in sales of goods of specific nature or second-hand goods, some aspects on the exercise of repair and replacement, and, even, their use as primary remedies rather than a reduction in price or a rescission of the contract. With regard to this, in England the possibility of offering the consumer free choice between these measures if the goods do not conform with the contract has been raised. This is far from the principle of pacta sunt servanda and is clearly contrary to the economic approach of the proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights. Up to now Spain has limited itself to implementing Art. 3.3 Directive 1999/44/CE into its legal system in almost literal terms and the case law on the issue has completely turned out to be insufficient. By contrast with Germany, the Spanish legislator has not extended the application of the rules of repair and replacement of Directive 1999/44/CE to nonconsumer sales, even though two draft bill proposals along these lines presented by the General Commission for Codifying (“Comisión General de Codificación”), the last one being in January, 2009