3 resultados para Art 8 Decreto 898 de 2003
em Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain
Resumo:
Con cierto retraso respecto a las fechas que venían siendo habituales, la Federación Española de Sociedades de Archivística, Biblioteconomía, Documentación y Museística (Fesabid) celebró en Barcelona, entre el 6 y el 8 de febrero de 2003, las VIII Jornadas Españolas de Documentación con la colaboración del Col·legi Oficial de Bibliotecaris-Documentalistes de Catalunya (Cobdc).
Resumo:
This paper explores analytically the contemporary pottery-making community of Pereruela (north-west Spain) that produces cooking pots from a mixture of red clay and kaolin. Analyses by different techniques (XRF, NAA, XRD, SEM and petrography) showed an extremely high variability for cooking ware pottery produced in a single production centre, by the same technology and using local clays. The main source of chemical variation is related to the use of different red clays and the presence of non-normally distributed inclusions of monazite. These two factors induce a high chemical variability, not only in the output of a single production centre, but even in the paste of a single pot, to an extent to which chemical compositions from one"workshop", or even one"pot", could be classified as having different provenances. The implications for the chemical characterization and for provenance studies of archaeological ceramics are addressed.
Resumo:
The study of technology transfer in pottery production to the periphery of the Mycenaean world has been addressed by considering two different areas, southern Italy and central Macedonia. Technological features such as ceramic paste, decoration and firing have been determined for different ceramic groups established according to provenance criteria. The studies of technology and provenance have been performed following an archaeometric approach, using neutron activation analysis, petrographic analysis, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The results have revealed the existence of two different models. On the one hand, southern Italy seems to exhibit a more organized pottery production, which follows a Mycenaean-like technology, while in central Macedonia production is probably more varied, being based in part on the technology of the local tradition.