Efficacy of modern antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials in bipolar depression: a meta-analysis.

Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy for second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar disorder. Despite depression being considered the hallmark of bipolar disorder, there are no published systematic reviews or meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy of modern atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression. We systematically reviewed published or registered randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of modern antipsychotics in adult bipolar I and/or II depressive patients (DSM-IV criteria). Efficacy outcomes were assessed based on changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) during an 8-wk period. Data were combined through meta-analysis using risk ratio as an effect size with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and with a level of statistical significance of 5% (p<0.05). We identified five RCTs; four involved antipsychotic monotherapy and one addressed both monotherapy and combination with an antidepressant. The two quetiapine trials analysed the safety and efficacy of two doses: 300 and 600 mg/d. The only olanzapine trial assessed olanzapine monotherapy within a range of 5-20 mg/d and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination within a range of 5-20 mg/d and 6-12 mg/d, respectively. The two aripiprazole placebo-controlled trials assessed doses of 5-30 mg/d. Quetiapine and olanzapine trials (3/5, 60%) demonstrated superiority over placebo (p<0.001). Only 2/5 (40%) (both aripiprazole trials) failed in the primary efficacy measure after the first 6 wk. Some modern antipsychotics (quetiapine and olanzapine) have demonstrated efficacy in bipolar depressive patients from week 1 onwards. Rapid onset of action seems to be a common feature of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression. Comment in The following popper user interface control may not be accessible. Tab to the next button to revert the control to an accessible version.Destroy user interface controlEfficacy of modern antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials in bipolar depression: a meta-analysis--results to be interpreted with caution.

Efecto placebo en el tratamiento conductual del insomnio : un enfoque desde las diferencias individuales

En el trabajo que se presenta se revisan varias investigaciones sobre el tratamiento conductual del insomnio de conciliación en los que se utilizan procedimientos de control placebo. Se encuentra que los procedimientos diseñados como control placebo causan diferentes efectos sobre la disminución de la latencia inicial de sueño, por lo que se infiere que por su naturaleza los distintos procedimientos diseñados inciden inespecíficamente en los sujetos insomnes.Se intenta buscar analogías hipotéticas sobre las diferencias individuales desde la perspectiva de la teoría de la Atribución (Storms & Nisbett, 1970; Brockner & Swap, 1983) y la hipótesis Extraversión-Arousal (Eysenck, 1967). Se sugiere que se incluyan las diferencias individuales como variables independientes en los futuros diseños en los que se utilicen procedimientos de atención placebo.

Factors modifying drug and placebo responses in randomized trials for bipolar mania

Factors modifying drug and placebo responses in randomized trials for bipolar mania. Yildiz A, Vieta E, Tohen M, Baldessarini RJ. Source Department of Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey. agul_yildiz@hotmail.com Abstract Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) are standard for assessing efficacy and safety of treatments. We pursued preliminary indications that some factors are associated differentially with responses to placebo or drugs in RCTs for bipolar mania. We meta-analysed data from RCTs to assess influences of study-site count, subjects' age, sex distribution, diagnostic subgroups, clinical features, trial-completion rates, and publication year on mean difference (MD) in mania ratings between intake and final assessments. In 38 RCTs involving 3812 placebo-treated and 6988 drug-treated patients, symptomatic improvement was similar in placebo arms of trials of effective (6.77, 95% CI 5.77-7.76) and ineffective (7.61, 95% CI 5.47-8.75) drugs. Lesser placebo responses (MD) and greater drug-placebo differences (Hedges' g) were associated with fewer study sites, younger patients' age, and male sex. More patients with initial psychotic features and more trial completion in drug arms were associated with greater drug-associated improvement (MD) and drug-placebo contrast (Hedges' g), whereas more mixed-state diagnoses decreased both measures. Identifying modifying factors can support more efficient and cost-effective designs of therapeutic trials. In trials for mania, fewer sites may limit placebo response and enhance drug-placebo contrasts.

Efficacy of modern antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials in bipolar depression: a meta-analysis.

Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy for second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar disorder. Despite depression being considered the hallmark of bipolar disorder, there are no published systematic reviews or meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy of modern atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression. We systematically reviewed published or registered randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of modern antipsychotics in adult bipolar I and/or II depressive patients (DSM-IV criteria). Efficacy outcomes were assessed based on changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) during an 8-wk period. Data were combined through meta-analysis using risk ratio as an effect size with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and with a level of statistical significance of 5% (p<0.05). We identified five RCTs; four involved antipsychotic monotherapy and one addressed both monotherapy and combination with an antidepressant. The two quetiapine trials analysed the safety and efficacy of two doses: 300 and 600 mg/d. The only olanzapine trial assessed olanzapine monotherapy within a range of 5-20 mg/d and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination within a range of 5-20 mg/d and 6-12 mg/d, respectively. The two aripiprazole placebo-controlled trials assessed doses of 5-30 mg/d. Quetiapine and olanzapine trials (3/5, 60%) demonstrated superiority over placebo (p<0.001). Only 2/5 (40%) (both aripiprazole trials) failed in the primary efficacy measure after the first 6 wk. Some modern antipsychotics (quetiapine and olanzapine) have demonstrated efficacy in bipolar depressive patients from week 1 onwards. Rapid onset of action seems to be a common feature of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression. Comment in The following popper user interface control may not be accessible. Tab to the next button to revert the control to an accessible version.Destroy user interface controlEfficacy of modern antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials in bipolar depression: a meta-analysis--results to be interpreted with caution.

Impact of geographical and cultural factors on clinical trials in acute mania: lessons from a ziprasidone and haloperidol placebo-controlled study

Clinical trials today are conducted in multiple countries to enhance patient recruitment and improve efficiency of trials. However, the demographic and cultural diversity may contribute to variations in study outcomes. Here we conducted post-hoc analyses for a placebo-controlled study with ziprasidone and haloperidol for the treatment of acute mania to address the demographic, dosing, and outcome disparities in India, Russia and the USA. We compared the baseline characteristics, outcomes and discontinuations in patients and explored the relationship between the outcome measures across these countries. We found substantial differences in baseline characteristics of subjects, administered dosage and disease severity in India compared to the USA and Russia. Conversely, US subjects had a higher placebo response compared to subjects in Russia and India. These results are probably due to demographic differences in patient populations and psychiatric clinical practice across countries. While we offer initial ideas to address the disparities identified in this analysis, it is clear that further research to improve our understanding of geographical differences is essential to ensure globally applicable results for clinical trials in psychiatry.

Randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the lipid lowering effect of co-formulated TDF/FTC

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have described improvements on lipid parameters when switching from other antiretroviral drugs to tenofovir (TDF) and impairments in lipid profile when discontinuing TDF. [1-3] It is unknown, however, if TDF has an intrinsic lipid-lowering effect or such findings are due to the addition or removal of other offending agents or other reasons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RESULTS: 46 subjects with a median age of 43 (40-48) years were enrolled in the study: 70% were male, 56% received DRV/r and 44% LPV/r. One subject withdrew the study voluntarily at week 4 and another one interrupted due to diarrhoea at week 24. Treatment with TDF/FTC decreased total, LDL and HDL-cholesterol from 235.9 to 204.9 (p<0.001), 154.7 to 127.6 (p<0.001) and 50.3 to 44.5 mg/dL (p<0.001), respectively. In comparison, total, LDL and HDL-cholesterol levels remained stable during placebo exposure. Week 12 total cholesterol (p<0.001), LDL-cholesterol (p<0.001) and HDL-cholesterol (p=0.011) levels were significantly lower in TDF/FTC versus placebo. Treatment with TDF/FTC reduced the fraction of subjects with abnormal fasting total-cholesterol (≥200 mg/dL) from 86.7% to 56.8% (p=0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (≥130 mg/dL) from 87.8% to 43.9% (p<0.001), which was not observed with placebo. There were no virological failures, and CD4 and triglyceride levels remained stable regardless of exposure. CONCLUSION: Coformulated TDF/FTC has an intrinsic lipid-lowering effect, likely attributable to TDF.

Assaig Clínic aleatoritzat de fase I en voluntaris sans per avaluar la seguretat de la vacuna terapèutica antituberculosa RUTI

Es va avaluar la seguretat de quatre dosis diferents (5, 25, 100 i 200 µg de FCMtb) d’una nova vacuna anti-tuberculosa (RUTI) en voluntaris sans comparant-la amb placebo amb un assaig clínic de fase I (n=24), unicèntric, doble cec, emmascarat, aleatoritzat (2:1), controlat amb placebo, seqüencial, d’escalada de dosi, administrant dues dosis de vacuna separades per 28 dies. Noranta-nou % dels esdeveniments adversos van ser lleus. Cefalea, dolor al lloc d’inoculació i fasciculacions van ser els esdeveniments locals més freqüents. Els grups de dosi de 5 i 25 µg de FCMtb van presentar la millor relació benefici/risc, sent d’elecció per a futurs estudis de fase II.

Double blind controlled trial of D-penicillamine in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

One hundred and eighty nine patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were entered into a double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial starting in January 1978 to assess the therapeutic value of d-penicillamine 1200 mg daily. Eighteen of the 98 patients receiving d-penicillamine and 22 of the 91 placebo treated patients died during the study. Thirty six per cent of those on d-penicillamine and 8% of those on placebo were withdrawn from the study. No difference in overall survival was noted between the two groups of patients whether the results were analysed for the entire period of observation or only during the period in which the patients were receiving therapy. The mortality rate of those receiving d-penicillamine in histological stage I to II, however, was one third of that of the placebo group although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Using the occurrence rate ratio as the statistical method of analysis, no effect of d-penicillamine was noted on any clinical, biochemical or hist

Efectos del clobazam sobre la memoria, atención y tiempo de reacción

A través de un diseño intrasujeto contrabalanceado, y sobre una base de doble ciego, se han estudiado, en relación al placebo, 1os efectos de una dosis única de 20 mg. de clobazam sobre la memoria, atencion y tiempo de reaccion medidos a traves de pruebas de laboratorio. Se ha utilizado una muestra de 9 sujetos, universitarios voluntarios, sin patologia orgánica conocida y con puntuaciones medias en 10s factores neuroticismo y extroversión del E.P.I. No se han encontrado diferencias significativas entre el clobazam y el placebo, salvo en la prueba de Tolouse-Pieron, la cua1 pone de manifiesto un efecto detrimental del clobazam. Por otra parte, aunque no estadisticamente significativas, se han apreciado dos tendencias. En primer lugar, el clobazam tiende a disminuir el rendimiento mnemico y de atencion y a incrementar la rapidez de respuesta en comparación con el placebo; en segundo lugar, el clobazam inhibe el efecto de practica en las aplicaciones sucesivas de las pruebas de atención y memoria y 10 potencia en el caso del tiempo de reaccion. Por todo ello se requiere una investigacion adicional con mas sujetos y un diseño experimental más complejo.

Efectos del clobazam sobre la memoria, atención y tiempo de reacción

A través de un diseño intrasujeto contrabalanceado, y sobre una base de doble ciego, se han estudiado, en relación al placebo, 1os efectos de una dosis única de 20 mg. de clobazam sobre la memoria, atencion y tiempo de reaccion medidos a traves de pruebas de laboratorio. Se ha utilizado una muestra de 9 sujetos, universitarios voluntarios, sin patologia orgánica conocida y con puntuaciones medias en 10s factores neuroticismo y extroversión del E.P.I. No se han encontrado diferencias significativas entre el clobazam y el placebo, salvo en la prueba de Tolouse-Pieron, la cua1 pone de manifiesto un efecto detrimental del clobazam. Por otra parte, aunque no estadisticamente significativas, se han apreciado dos tendencias. En primer lugar, el clobazam tiende a disminuir el rendimiento mnemico y de atencion y a incrementar la rapidez de respuesta en comparación con el placebo; en segundo lugar, el clobazam inhibe el efecto de practica en las aplicaciones sucesivas de las pruebas de atención y memoria y 10 potencia en el caso del tiempo de reaccion. Por todo ello se requiere una investigacion adicional con mas sujetos y un diseño experimental más complejo.

Aplicaciones del láser blando en odontología

Las principales aplicaciones del láser blando en Odontología son como analgésico, antiinflamatorio, cicatrizante y hemostático. Algunos estudios in vitro parecen demostrar que el láser blando modifica ciertas reacciones a nivel bioquímico, pero a la hora de su aplicación clínica no hay unanimidad respecto a su efectividad ya que, frente a los estudios cuyos resultados son positivos, están los que no los obtienen y lo relacionan a un posible efecto placebo. A esta controversia se suma el hecho de que los estudios sobre el láser blando son difíciles de evaluar, porque en la mayoría falta la especificación de alguno de los parámetros que intervienen en la emisión láser. Otra aplicación del láser blando en Odontología se realiza sobre células marcadas con un fotosensibilizador para obtener un efecto destructivo selectivo de dichas células. Este procedimiento parece ser útil sobre células cancerosas y microorganismos patógenos.

Tratamiento con acupuntura en pacientes diagnosticados del Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica

El Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica presenta muchas perturbaciones *multidimensionales que afectan de forma *holística a las personas que sufren esta enfermedad y que el tratamiento actual de la fatiga, dolor, ansiedad-depresión y alteraciones del sueño, presentes en esta entidad clínica, es insatisfactorio. La hipótesis de partida de este ensayo consiste a contrastar que la acupuntura resulta más útil que el placebo. Proponemos la realización de un estudio clínico, aleatorio y controlado con placebo, de la técnica de acupuntura, orientado al aumento de la sensación del paciente de bienestar, al alivio del dolor y de la rigidez, la acupuntura es eficaz para reducir la fatiga, ansiedad-depresión y alteraciones del sueño, en el paciente diagnosticado, del Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica.

Eficàcia de la teràpia amb aigua de mar isitònica nebulitzada en pacients amb MPOC. Beneficis respecte a l'ús del sèrum fisiològic convencional

Objectius: Establir l’eficàcia del tractament, en quant a la millora de la qualitat de vida relacionada amb la salut (CVRS) que podem obtenir, efectuant nebulitzacions amb aigua de mar isotònica versus el sèrum fisiològic, en pacients crònics respiratoris amb MPOC. Secundàriament vol determinar si hi ha una millora subjectiva de la tolerància a l’exercici físic, una reducció significativa dels símptomes, de les aguditzacions amb els conseqüents ingressos hospitalaris i una reducció de la despesa farmacèutica. - Metodologia: Assaig clínic aleatoritzat a doble cec sobre 3 grups (aigua de mar, sèrum fisiològic i placebo) de 60 pacients d’atenció primària diagnosticats de MPOC moderada segons els criteris GOLD que hagin superat els criteris d’inclusió i exclusió. Les teràpies s’autoadministraran al propi domicili. Els resultats seran avaluats mitjançant els següents instruments: el CRQ (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire), l’escala de dispnea del British Medical Research Council (MRC), la prova de la marxa de 6 minuts, espirometria, analítica, gasometria arterial i pulsioximetria. - Limitacions de l’estudi: Manca de participació, incompliment terapèutic, abandonament de l’hàbit tabàquic durant el tractament i pèrdues per temporalitat.

Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes

Background: Vorapaxar is a new oral protease-activatedreceptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist that inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation. Methods: In this multinational, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared vorapaxar with placebo in 12,944 patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Follow-up in the trial was terminated early after a safety review. After a median follow-up of 502 days (interquartile range, 349 to 667), the primary end point occurred in 1031 of 6473 patients receiving vorapaxar versus 1102 of 6471 patients receiving placebo (KaplanMeier 2-year rate, 18.5% vs. 19.9%; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.01; P = 0.07). A composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 822 patients in the vorapaxar group versus 910 in the placebo group (14.7% and 16.4%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P = 0.02). Rates of moderate and severe bleeding were 7.2% in the vorapaxar group and 5.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.58; P<0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively (hazard ratio, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.78 to 6.45; P<0.001). Rates of nonhemorrhagic adverse events were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: In patients with acute coronary syndromes, the addition of vorapaxar to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point but significantly increased the risk of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage. (Funded by Merck; TRACER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00527943.)

Effectiveness of psychotropic medications in the maintenance phase of bipolar disorder:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy of maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder. Placebo-controlled or active comparator bipolar maintenance clinical trials of ≥6 months' duration with at least 15 patients/treatment group were identified using Medline, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane databases (1993 to July 2010). The main outcome measure was relative risk for relapse for patients in remission. Twenty trials (5,364 patients) were identified. Overall, lithium and quetiapine were the most studied agents (eight and five trials, respectively). The majority of studies included patients who had previously responded to treatment for an acute episode. All interventions, with the exception of perphenazine+mood stabilizer, showed a relative risk for manic/mixed or depressive relapse below 1.0, although there was variation in the statistical significance of the findings vs. placebo. No monotherapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk for both manic/mixed and depressed relapse. Of the combination treatments, only quetiapine+lithium/divalproex, was associated with a significantly reduced risk vs. comparator (placebo+lithium/valproate) for relapse at both the manic/mixed and depressed poles of bipolar illness. Limitations for the analysis include differences in study durations and definitions of relapse. In conclusion, available maintenance therapies show considerable variation in efficacy. The efficacy of lithium and divalproex has been confirmed, but newer therapies, such as a number of atypical antipsychotics were also shown to be effective in bipolar disorder. Efficacy of all maintenance interventions needs to be balanced against the safety and tolerability profiles of individual agents.