Learning the ropes and embracing the rules: CFSP institutions as arenas for learning and strategic socialisation

The aim of this article is to analyse those situations in which learning and socialisation take place within the context of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), in particular, at the level of experts in the Council Working Groups. Learning can explain the institutional development of CFSP and changes in the foreign policies of the Member States. Some scope conditions for learning and channels of institutionalisation are identified. Socialisation, resulting from learning within a group, is perceived as a strategic action by reflective actors. National diplomats, once they arrive in Brussels, learn the new code of conduct of their Working Groups. They are embedded in two environments and faced with two logics: the European one in the Council and the national one in the Ministries of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The empirical evidence supports the argument that neither rational nor sociological approaches alone can account for these processes.

EU foreign policy towards Georgia: just for energy?

The paper analyses how the EU foreign policy towards Georgia changed after the Rose Revolution, reaching greater levels of involvement and assistance. It is argued that the pro-western and reformist new government in Georgia triggered a new orientation in the EU foreign policy towards the country based on a logic of appropriateness, that is EU´s values, in addition to energy interests. Comparative analysis in the Southern-Caucasus and other Eastern-European countries shows how reformist and pro-EU governments receive more EU support and assistance. This does not mean that material interest do not play an important role. However, the EU seems to be coherent with its values when regarding the European neighbourhood.

Material Flow Accounting in Chile, Ecuador, Mexico and Peru (1980-2000)

In this paper we compare the resource flows of Chile, Ecuador, Mexico and Peru between 1980 and 2000. In this time span, the domestic extraction of materials increased in the four countries, mainly due to the mining sector in Chile and Peru, biomass and oil in Ecuador and construction minerals in Mexico. Imports and exports increased too, due to the increasing integration in the international markets, prompted by the liberalization policies undertaken by the four countries between the late 1970s and the late 1990s. The four countries had a negative physical trade balance for most of the period analyzed, meaning that their exports exceeded their imports in terms of weight. However, the increase of imports reduced the physical deficit in Chile, Mexico and Peru. Ecuador’s physical deficit was the highest and did not decrease in the period analyzed. Also, a diversification of exports away from bulk commodities could be observed in Chile and Mexico, and to a lesser extent in Peru, whereas in Ecuador the export sector remained mainly based on oil and biomass. More research is needed to explore the environmental effects of this phenomenon. Also, the indirect flows associated to the direct physical flows deserve to be subject to further analysis.

Regulation in the Age of Globalization: The Difussion of Regulatory Agencies across Europe and Latin America

One of the most notable characteristics of the change in governance of the past two decades has been the restructuring of the state, most notably the delegation of authority from politicians and ministries to technocrats and regulatory agencies. Our unique dataset on the extent of these reforms in seven sectors in 36 countries reveals the widespread diffusion of these reforms in recent decades. In 1986 there were only 23 agencies across these sectors and countries (less than one agency per country); by 2002 this number had increased more than seven-fold, to 169. On average these 36 countries each have more than four agencies in the seven sectors studied. Yet the widespread diffusion of these reforms is characterized by cross-regional and cross-sectoral variations. Our data reveal two major variations: first, reforms are more widespread in economic regulation that in social spheres; second, regulatory agencies in the social spheres are more widespread in Europe than in Latin America. Why these variations in the spread of the reforms? In this paper we present for the first time the regulatory gaps across regions and sectors and then move on to offer some explanations for these gaps in a way that sheds some light on the nature of these reforms and on their limits. Our explanatory framework combines diffusion and structural explanations and in doing so sheds new light on the global diffusion of public policy ideas.

The Experience of European Integration and the Potential for Integration in South America

The experience of the European Union is the most significant and far-reaching among all attempts at regional integration. It is, therefore, the most likely to provide some lessons for those world regions that are just beginning this complex process. In turn, the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR) and the Andean Community (CAN) are among the regional integration projects that have reached the greatest level of formal accomplishment after the EU. MERCOSUR is a customs union that aspires to become a common market, while avowing the commitment to advance towards political integration. For its part, CAN is a customs union that has already developed supranational institutions such as a Commission, a Parliament and a Court of Justice. In both cases, however, words have progressively tended to wander far from deeds. One reason underlying this phenomenon may be a misunderstanding of the European experience with integration. In this article, we discuss the theories that have been developed to account for integration in Europe and may prove useful to understand integration elsewhere and put forward a set of lessons that could be drawn from the European experience. Subsequently, we introduce a description of the experience of integration in South America and reflect (critically) on how the theories and lessons drawn from the EU could be applied to this region –and beyond.

The European Union Police Mission: The Beginning of a New Future for Bosnia and Herzegovina?

The creation, reform and/or restructuring of the police in post-conflict societies remains one of the key challenges for practitioners and scholars in the contemporary fields of peace and security, particularly due to the changing nature of conflicts. Since the 1990s the world has witnessed a proliferation of international police missions, with regional organisations gradually acquiring a prominent role. This paper analyses the 2003-2005 period of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Much is at stake in this mission, both in terms of the development of the EU´s external identity but also for Bosnia and Herzegovina’s road to EU membership and sustainable peace. This paper will argue that by 2005 the balance sheet was mixed. EUPM fell short of fulfilling its overall goal of ‘Europeanising’ Bosnian police services, and of its desire to be seen as providing that additional ingredient in police matters that would set it apart from the earlier UN mission. Nevertheless, despite its shortcomings, the Mission did not merit the harsh criticisms it was faced with. Its lack of success was not entirely the Mission’s doing. The paper focuses on three aspects: political and economic viability and sustainability, security levels in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and institution and capacity building. The explanatory framework used in this paper is based on the democratic policing discourse. In doing so the argument developed here will also shed light on the nature of so-called “best European practices” in police matters.

La comunidade de traballo Galicia-norte de Portugal. Elementos para la comparación

Contribució al Seminari: "Les Euroregions: Experiències i aprenatges per a l’Euroregió Pirineus-Mediterrània", 15-16 de desembre de 2005

The Electoral Determinants of Collective Remittances: The Mexican 3x1 Program for Migrants

The 3x1 Program for Migrants is a matching grant scheme that seeks to direct the money sent by migrant organizations abroad to the provision of public and social infrastructure, and to productive projects in migrants’ communities of origin. To do so, the municipal, state, and federal administrations match the amount sent by hometown associations by 3 to 1. This opens the door to the political manipulation of the program. We explore the impact of a particular facet of Mexican political life on the operation of the 3x1: its recent democratization and the increasing political competition at the municipal level. Relying on the literature on redistributive politics, we posit that an increasing number of effective parties in elections may have two different effects. On the one hand, the need to cater to more heterogeneous constituencies may increase the provision of public projects. On the other hand, since smaller coalitions are needed to win elections under tighter competition, fewer public and more private (clientelistic) projects could be awarded. Using a unique dataset on the 3x1 Program for Migrants for over 2,400 municipalities in the period 2002 through 2007, we find a lower provision of public goods in electorally competitive jurisdictions. Thus, we remain sceptical about the program success in promoting public goods in politically competitive locations with high migration levels.

Ciencia, industria e ideología en la Cataluña del siglo XX: el Instituto Ravetllat-Pla en Sudamérica entre 1924 y 1936

En 1923, Ramón Plá i Armengol (1880-1958) fundó el Instituto Ravetllat-Pla para la comercialización y producción de dos productos antituberculosos (Hemo-Antitoxina y Suero Ravetllat-Pla) fundamentados en una teoría heterodoxa postulada por el veterinario Joaquim Ravetllat i Estech (1871-1923). A través del instituto creó una gran red internacional científico-comercial principalmente en Latinoamérica. Plá i Armengol fue doctor en medicina y participó activamente en la lucha antituberculosa en Cataluña sin dejar de lado su militancia socialista. A través de estos dos productos, logró crear un mercado que se sustentaba en una teoría heterodoxa que integraban sus principios e ideología.

The Impact of democratization: a preliminary investigation on social policies and political violence in Latin America

The recent strides of democracy in Latin America have been associated to conflicting outcomes. The expectation that democracy would bring about peace and prosperity have been only partly satisfied. While political violence has been by and large eradicated from the sub-continent, poverty and social injustice still prevail and hold sway. Our study argues that democracy matters for inequality through the growing strength of center left and left parties and by making political leaders in general more responsive to the underprivileged. Furthermore, although the pension reforms recently enacted in the region generated overall regressive outcomes on income distribution, democratic countries still benefit from their political past: where democratic tradition was stronger, such outcomes have been milder. Democratic tradition and the specific ideological connotations of the parties in power, on the other hand, did not play an equally crucial role in securing lower levels of political violence: during the last wave of democratizations in Latin America, domestic peace was rather an outcome of political and social concessions to those in distress. In sum, together with other factors and especially economic ones, the reason why recent democratizations have provided domestic peace in most cases, but have been unable so far to solve the problem of poverty and inequality, is that democratic traditions in the subcontinent have been relatively weak and, more specifically, that this weakness has undermined the growth of left and progressive parties, acting as an obstacle to redistribution. Such weakness, on the other hand, has not prevented the drastic reduction of domestic political violence, since what mattered in this case was a combination of symbolic or material concessions and political agreements among powerful élites and counter-élites.

La polémica de los libros de texto de historia como caso de estudio en las relaciones sino-japonesas

En el año 1982, la prensa japonesa publicó que el Ministerio de Educación nipón había suavizado en los libros de texto de historia las atrocidades cometidas durante la Guerra del Pacífico mediante el proceso de autorización de los libros realizado por el gobierno. Esta polémica y la publicación del Nuevo Libro de Historia en el año 2001, han sido dos de las controversias que con más fuerza se han debatido y han influenciado las relaciones bilaterales entre la República Popular China y Japón. El presente trabajo de investigación analiza los factores que contribuyeron al surgimiento del debate sobre la interpretación de la historia en Japón y a la posterior expansión internacional de la polémica de los libros de texto.

Los Gobiernos de coalición y su incidencia sobre los presidencialismos latinoamericanos: el caso del Cono Sur

Si bien los estudios sobre las coaliciones de gobierno constituyeron uno de los campos más estudiado en la literatura en ciencias políticas, merece precisar que la gran mayoría de los estudios sufren de un eurocentrismo al centrarse esencialmente sobre los sistemas parlamentarios de gobierno. Al ubicarse en la órbita del debate en boga sobre presidencialismo vs. parlamentarismo, los gobiernos de coaliciones fueron ampliamente sub-estudiados en los presidencialismos. Los pocos trabajos que se publicaron, se limitaron generalmente al análisis de los repartos de las parcelas de poder, o las disoluciones de las coaliciones. Este trabajo se propone asimismo realizar una actualización de las teorías de las coaliciones aplicándolas a los presidencialismos latinoamericanos. Nos centralizaremos sobre las experiencias conosurianas, y demostraremos asimismo que lejos de ser un fenómeno “accidental”, esas coaliciones incidieron sobre la gobernanza y el qué hacer político, y condujeron a un reordenamiento sustantivo de los sistemas partidarios.

¿Nuevos actores, nuevas prácticas?. Los casos de reordenamiento de los bipartidismos en Argentina, Colombia y Uruguay, desde los años 60

La mayoría de las democracias latinoamericanas se caracterizaban por un esquema de competencia partidaria bipartidista. Se observó, no obstante, en los años ochenta-noventa un re-ordenamiento concomitante a toda la región de los sistemas de partidos, cuya principal consecuencia fue la deconstrucción de los bipartidismos. Esta situación nos lleva a preguntarnos si es posible identificar causas comunes que den cuenta de este fenómeno. Demostramos en este trabajo, a través del estudio de Colombia, la Argentina y Uruguay, que aquello consistió más bien en un realineamiento de los patrones de representación dentro de los sistemas de partido. Los procesos de cada uno de estos países, cuyos bipartidismos suelen considerarse como “tradicionales”, se caracterizaron por dinámicas específicas y diferenciadas no extrapolables a toda la región. Presentaremos asimismo las lógicas de realineamiento partidario y destacaremos los “eventos críticos” más propensos a la transformación política en la región.

La Investigació d'incendis i explosions

En el marc de les Jornades sobre investigació de sinistres que es van realitzar a l’Institut el juny de 2008, es va copsar la necessitat de crear un grup de recerca per facilitar l’intercanvi d’experiències professionals i per impulsar la coordinació en l’actuació dels diferents agents i sectors implicats en la investigació d’incendis i explosions. Així, l’octubre de 2008 l’Àrea de Recerca, Coneixement i Relacions Exteriors de l’Institut va posar en marxa el Grup de recerca sobre investigació d’incendis i explosions (GRIE), de caràcter multidisciplinari i transversal, amb la participació de persones d’expertesa reconeguda, en representació dels diferents àmbits que poden intervenir en la investigació d’aquest tipus de sinistres: bombers, mossos d’esquadra, companyies d’assegurances, empreses privades, universitat, judicatura i medicina forense. L’Àrea de Recerca va dur a terme la coordinació del Grup, que es va reunir amb una regularitat mensual —de l’octubre de 2008 fins al desembre de 2009—, per tal d’acomplir els objectius següents: d’una banda, posar en comú el coneixement i el bagatge dels diversos professionals per poder valorar l’estat de la qüestió en la investigació d’incendis i explosions; de l’altra, elaborar un document descriptiu i didàctic, a partir de l’anàlisi de casos concrets, amb el propòsit d’oferir unes pautes generals —des del pensament i amb total respecte a les competències i responsabilitats dels protagonistes de les actuacions on intervenen—, amb informació i una metodologia útil per a tots els sectors. Al llarg d’aquest temps també es va comptar amb la participació puntual d’altres professionals per a l’avaluació d’aspectes específics. Cal remarcar que l’abast de l’estudi es limita als incendis i les explosions en edificis i indústries de qualsevol ús i en infraestructures. No s’han tractat, doncs, els incendis forestals, que són un àmbit molt més específic i determinat, ni tampoc els incendis que afecten matèries perilloses i d’altres en entorns singulars, que en qualsevol cas poden ser objecte d’estudis posteriors més especialitzats. La investigació d’incendis i explosions és, clarament, una matèria transversal ja que, com s’ha dit, en els casos complexos hi intervenen policies, bombers, companyies d’assegurances, gabinets tècnics i universitats, jutges i forenses. Els objectius de cada agent són lògicament sectorials, és a dir orientats a respondre a les qüestions habituals del seu camp d’actuació. La policia intervé quan es sospiten actes il·lícits o quan és requerida per l’autoritat judicial per fer-ho; la intervenció, doncs, no és exhaustiva i es limita a un percentatge relativament petit dels casos, i sempre l’objectiu és recollir proves per atribuir, en judicis, responsabilitats civils o, en el seu cas, penals.