Avaluació de l'aptitud de bioestabilitzats com a esmena orgànica per a la rehabilitació de sòls

L’objectiu d’aquest estudi ha estat avaluar l’efecte que té sobre algunes propietats fisicoquímiques del sòl i el creixement de plantes, l’adició del producte compostat obtingut a partir de la fracció orgànica dels residus sòlids urbans de recollida no selectiva, material anomenat bioestabilitzat. S’ha dut a terme un bioassaig amb blat (Triticum aestivum), utilitzant bioestabilitzat procedent de dues plantes de tractament mecànic i biològic, Vacarisses i Mataró, que s’ha aplicat a diferents dosis en un sòl de baixa qualitat. S’ha observat una relació positiva entre el creixement del blat i la dosis de bioestabilitzat aplicada. Pel que fa a la germinació, ha estat lleugerament estimulada per les dosis intermèdies de bioestabilitzat assajades. En quant a les propietats fisicoquímiques del sòl, s’ha observat un increment de la salinitat en funció de la dosis de bioestabilitzat aplicada, que en les més elevades podria ser problemàtica. També, el contingut de matèria orgànica ha augmentat de manera proporcional a la dosis, cosa que ha millorat les propietats físiques del sòl. Per altra banda, s’han trobat continguts d’impropis (vidre, plàstic ...) i concentracions d’alguns metalls pesants bastant elevades, així com una considerable variabilitat entre les partides de bioestabilitzat. Finalment, es conclou que abans de permetre l’aplicació de bioestabilitzat per a la rehabilitació de sòls degradats, cal aprofundir més en l’estudi d’aquest material.

25-years of biomonitoring in two mediterranean streams (Llobregat and Besos basins, NE Spain)

Biological water quality changes in two Mediterranean river basins from a network of 42 sampling sites assessed since 1979 are presented. In order to characterize the biological quality, the index FBILL, designed to characterize these rivers" quality using aquatic macroinvertebrates, is used. When comparing the data from recent years to older ones, only two headwater sites from the 42 had improved their water quality to good or very good conditions. In the middle or low river basin sites or even in headwater localities were river flow is reduced, the important investment to build up sewage water treatment systems and plants (more than 70 in 15 years) allowed for a small recovery from poor or very poor conditions to moderate water quality. Nevertheless still a significant number (25 %) of the localities remain in poor conditions. The evolution of the quality in several points of both basins shows how the main problems for the recovery of the biological quality is due to the water diverted for small hydraulic plants, the presence of saline pollution in the Llobregat River, and the insufficient water depuration. In the smaller rivers, and specially the Besòs the lack of dilution flows from the treatment plants is the main problem for water quality recovery.

Filtration of effluents for microirrigation systems

Clogging, measured through head loss across filters, and the filtration quality of different filters using different effluents were studied. The filters used were: 115, 130, and 200 m disc filters; 98, 115, 130, and 178 m screen filters; and a sand filter filled with a single layer of sand with an effective diameter of 0.65 mm. The filters were used with a meat industry effluent and secondary and tertiary effluents of two wastewater treatment plants. It was observed that clogging depended on the type of effluent. With the meat industry effluent, the poorest quality effluent, disc filters clogged more than the other filter types. When the wastewater treatment plant effluents were used, the disc filters showed less frequent clogging. Several physical and chemical parameters, such as total suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand, turbidity, electrical conductivity, pH, and number of particles, were analyzed in the effluents at the entry and exit points of the filters. In general, filters did not reduce the values of the main clogging parameters to a great degree. It was found that the parameter that explained the clogging, expressed as Boucher’s filterability index, was different depending on the type of effluent and filter. The best quality of filtration was achieved with a sand filter when the meat industry effluent was used. No significant differences were observed between the quality of filtration of disc and screen filters when operating with the secondary and tertiary effluents

Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs

The objective of this paper was to show the potential additional insight that result from adding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to plant performance evaluation criteria, such as effluent quality (EQI) and operational cost (OCI) indices, when evaluating (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The proposed GHG evaluation is based on a set of comprehensive dynamic models that estimate the most significant potential on-site and off-site sources of CO2, CH4 and N2O. The study calculates and discusses the changes in EQI, OCI and the emission of GHGs as a consequence of varying the following four process variables: (i) the set point of aeration control in the activated sludge section; (ii) the removal efficiency of total suspended solids (TSS) in the primary clarifier; (iii) the temperature in the anaerobic digester; and (iv) the control of the flow of anaerobic digester supernatants coming from sludge treatment. Based upon the assumptions built into the model structures, simulation results highlight the potential undesirable effects of increased GHG production when carrying out local energy optimization of the aeration system in the activated sludge section and energy recovery from the AD. Although off-site CO2 emissions may decrease, the effect is counterbalanced by increased N2O emissions, especially since N2O has a 300-fold stronger greenhouse effect than CO2. The reported results emphasize the importance and usefulness of using multiple evaluation criteria to compare and evaluate (plant-wide) control strategies in a WWTP for more informed operational decision making