Recomendações para Análise Mutacional em Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal (GISTs). Grupo de Trabalho Português GIST - Proposta de Condeixa

Os autores apresentam as recomendações para a análise mutacional de GISTs, aprovadas por unanimidade por um grupo multidisciplinar em 20 de Julho de 2012. O estado mutacional de genes como o KIT e o PDGFRA permite identificar alvos terapêuticos para inibidores da tirosinacínase (ITKs) e, por isso, a boa prática clínica nas decisões bioterapêuticas de doentes com GISTs deve incluir a análise do estado mutacional. A análise mutacional da doença primária não é recomendada na rotina diagnóstica da generalidade dos GISTs; no entanto, pode ter valor prognóstico e ser útil na seleção de doentes, após ressecção completa de GIST primário e é considerada experimental na doença progressiva sob tratamento com ITKs. A análise mutacional deve considerar-se nos casos selecionados descritos neste texto e ser realizada em laboratórios em conformidade com padrões elevados de garantia de qualidade, atendendo ao seu elevado impacto sobre as decisões clínicas.

Position Statement on Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Portugal

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were recently approved for percutaneous coronary intervention in Europe. The aim of this position statement is to review the information and studies on available BVS, to stimulate discussion on their use and to propose guidelines for this treatment option in Portugal. METHODS AND RESULTS: A working group was set up to reach a consensus based on current evidence, discussion of clinical case models and individual experience. The evidence suggests that currently available BVS can produce physiological and clinical improvements in selected patients. There are encouraging data on their durability and long-term safety. Initial indications were grouped into three categories: (a) consensual and appropriate - young patients, diabetic patients, left anterior descending artery, long lesions, diffuse disease, and hybrid strategy; (b) less consensual but possible - small collateral branches, stabilized acute coronary syndromes; and (c) inappropriate - left main disease, tortuosity, severe calcification. CONCLUSION: BVS are a viable treatment option based on the encouraging evidence of their applicability and physiological and clinical results. They should be used in appropriate indications and will require technical adaptations. Outcome monitoring and evaluation is essential to avoid inappropriate use. It is recommended that medical societies produce clinical guidelines based on high-quality registries as soon as possible.