Do Spirituality and Faith Make a Difference? Report from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study Group

OBJECTIVE: In the last decade, some attention has been given to spirituality and faith and their role in cancer patients' coping. Few data are available about spirituality among cancer patients in Southern European countries, which have a big tradition of spirituality, namely, the Catholic religion. As part of a more general investigation (Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study--SEPOS), the aim of this study was to examine the effect of spirituality in molding psychosocial implications in Southern European cancer patients. METHOD: A convenience sample of 323 outpatients with a diagnosis of cancer between 6 to 18 months, a good performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status > 80), and no cognitive deficits or central nervous system (CNS) involvement by disease were approached in university and affiliated cancer centers in Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Switzerland (Italian speaking area). Each patient was evaluated for spirituality (Visual Analog Scale 0-10), psychological morbidity (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale--HADS), coping strategies (Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer--Mini-MAC) and concerns about illness (Cancer Worries Inventory--CWI). RESULTS. The majority of patients (79.3%) referred to being supported by their spirituality/faith throughout their illness. Significant differences were found between the spirituality and non-spirituality groups (p ≤ 0.01) in terms of education, coping styles, and psychological morbidity. Spirituality was significantly correlated with fighting spirit (r = -0.27), fatalism (r = 0.50), and avoidance (r = 0.23) coping styles and negatively correlated with education (r = -0.25), depression (r = -0.22) and HAD total (r = -0.17). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Spirituality is frequent among Southern European cancer patients with lower education and seems to play some protective role towards psychological morbidity, specifically depression. Further studies should examine this trend in Southern European cancer patients.

Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging - Aplicações em Neuropediatria

de imagem em RM, caracterizada pela sua alta resolução espacial e grande sensibilidade a diferenças de susceptibilidade magnética dos tecidos, acentuando as propriedades paramagnéticas de produtos como a desoxihemoglobina, hemossiderina, ferro e cálcio e sendo particularmente útil na avaliação das estruturas venosas. Objectivos: O objectivo deste trabalho é fazer uma breve revisão das aplicações clínicas da sequência SWI em neuropediatria e demonstrar a sua grande utilidade, nomeadamente em comparação as a sequência T2*. Material e Métodos: Os exames foram realizados a crianças com idades compreendidas entre o período neonatal e os 16 anos, internadas ou seguidas em consulta no Hospital Pediátrico D. Estefânia; as imagens SWI foram efectuadas em equipamento Siemens 1.5 T, Avanto, com os seguintes parâmetros: TR 49, TE 40, flip angle 15, espessura 1,6mm. Resultados: Apresentamos vários casos ilustrativos de patologias em que o SWI demonstra a sua utilidade e mais-valia, nomeadamente na detecção de lesões hemorrágicas recentes ou antigas em diferentes contextos particulares em neuropediatria (patologia hipoxico-isquémica, vascular, trauma não acidental), detecção de cavernomas e anomalias venosas de desenvolvimento, avaliação de tumores e doenças neurodegenerativas. Conclusão: A sequência SWI é bastante útil na avaliação imagiológica de várias patologias e variantes venosas em neuropediatria, fornecendo uma informação adicional com implicações diagnósticas e prognósticas comparativamente com o T2*, obviando também a administração de contraste para avaliação de estruturas venosas.

A Brother or a Sister With CP. How Much it Makes a Difference in Childhood and Adulthood?

Every month we see to be published dozens of scientific papers about etiology and physiopathology of CP, imaging, treatment, survival, quality of life of patients and of mothers (just a few) and so on. Papers dealing with the feelings and the problems of siblings of children and adults with CP in the most important scientific journals are extremely rare. However in internet we can find the sites of the most important Cerebral Palsy Societies, like the British, the Australian and the American ones already devoting a special attention to the issue of siblings; we also can see several interesting blogs of parents sharing their experiences not only with the handicapped child but also with the siblings, even counseling some books written for children giving practical advices how to deal and live with a handicapped sibling. What was a surprise to me were the several sites of adults having a disabled sibling, frequently with CP, in a new situation: without parents to care them.

Ponseti Method: Does Age at the Beginning of Treatment Make a Difference?

The Ponseti method is reportedly effective for treating clubfoot in children up to 9 years of age. However, whether age at the beginning of treatment influences the rate of successful correction and the rate of relapse is unknown. We therefore retrospectively reviewed 68 consecutive children with 102 idiopathic clubfeet treated by the Ponseti technique in four Portuguese hospitals. We followed patients a minimum of 30 months (mean, 41.4 months; range, 30–61 months). The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the beginning of treatment; Group I was younger than 6 months and Group II was older than 6 months. All feet(100%) were initially corrected and no feet required extensive surgery regardless of age at the beginning of treatment. There were no differences between Groups I and II in the number of casts, tenotomies, success in terms of rate of initial correction, rate of recurrence, and rate of tibialis anterior transference. The rate of the Ponseti method in avoiding extensive surgery was 100% in Groups I and II; relapses occurred in 8% of the feet in younger and older children. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.