1 resultado para time of application and nutrient leaf content
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (28)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (60)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (6)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (43)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (36)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (25)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (13)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (14)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (16)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (209)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (4)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (87)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (16)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (97)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (29)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (10)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (62)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (40)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with low concentrations of anesthetics is effective in reducing labor pain. The aim of this study was to assess and compare two ultra-low dose regimens of ropivacaine and sufentanil (0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0.06% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) on the intervals between boluses and the duration of labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this non-randomized prospective study, conducted between January and July 2010, two groups of parturients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Group I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) and Group II (n = 57; 0.6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Rescue doses of ropivacaine at the concentration of the assigned group without sufentanil were administered as necessary. Pain, local anesthetic requirements, neuraxial blockade characteristics, labor and neonatal outcomes, and maternal satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: The ropivacaine dose was greater in Group I (9.5 [7.7-12.7] mg.h-1 vs. 6.1 [5.1-9.8 mg.h-1], p < 0.001). A time increase between each bolus was observed in Group I (beta = 32.61 min, 95% CI [25.39; 39.82], p < 0.001), whereas a time decrease was observed in Group II (beta = -1.40 min, 95% CI [-2.44; -0.36], p = 0.009). The duration of the second stage of labor in Group I was significantly longer than that in Group II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Parturients receiving 0.06% ropivacaine exhibited less evidence of cumulative effects and exhibited faster second stage progression than those who received 0.1% ropivacaine.