Defying Standard Criteria for Digital Replantation: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION: There is much controversy regarding the current indications and contraindications for digital replantation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Three patients with absolute contraindications for digital replantation according to classical criteria are presented (Case 1: multilevel amputation of the hand and fingers; Case 3: avulsion of the thumb; Case 4: index amputation proximal to the insertion of the flexor digitorum superficialis). In addition a patient with a very distal digital amputation (Case 2), whose indication for replantation is controversial is also presented. In all cases, the patients were replanted and showed good functional and aesthetical results. DISCUSSION: Most authors advocate that the classical indications for replantation have been validated by experience, are predicated on the potential for long-term function, and should be followed in most if not all cases. However, some surgeons have been adopting a more liberal attitude with good results. CONCLUSION: The clinical cases presented in this paper suggest that the standard criteria for digital replantation should not be followed rigidly but instead should be regarded as a general guide.

Conexão Venosa Pulmonar Anómala. Estudo de Vinte e Quatro Crianças com Angiografia de Subtracção Digital

Objectivo: Avaliar a acuidade da angiografia de subtracção digital (ASD) no diagnóstico morfológico da conexão venosa pulmonar anómala (CVPA) em crianças. Concepção do estudo: Estudo prospectivo de doentes consecutivos entre Janeiro de 1989 e Julho de 1992. Tipo de Atendimento: Serviço de Cardiologia Pediátrica de um Hospital Central. População: Vinte e quatro doentes com CVPA. Métodos: Todos os doentes fizeram avaliação clínica e ecocardiográfica completa (modo M, bidimensional e Doppler) antes da realização do exame hemodinâmico. Em todos os casos se fizeram, de modo sistemático, injecções selectivas de contraste de baixa osmolaridade (0,5-1 ml/kg; dose total <6 mi/kg) no tronco e ramos da artéria pulmonar com registo em angiografia com subtracção digital (ASD). As imagens colhidas foram trabalhadas, selecciona das e armazenadas em video-cassetes e películas fotográficas (câmara multiformato). Resultados: Dezasseis doentes tinham CVPA total (CVPAT): onze à veia cava superior (VCS), dois ao seio coronário e três infradiafragmáticos (dois à veia cava inferior (VCI) e um à veia porta). Oito crianças tinham CVPA parcial (CVPAP): três à VCS, uma à aurícula direita (AD), três à VCI (síndroma da cimitarra) e num caso a CVPA era mista. Em oito doentes (seis com CVPAT e dois com CVPAP), a ASD contribuiu significativamente para o diagnóstico final tendo completado ou corrigido a informação obtida por ecocardiografia. Nos dezoito doentes submetidos a cirurgia cardíaca foi confirmado o diagnóstico obtido por ASD. Conclusões: A ASD é um método muito útil para o diagnóstico anatómico de doentes com CVPA. Na nossa experiência foi particularmente informativa a análise de registos em «video». A ASD está indicada nos casos em que os achados clínicos e ecocardiográficos não sejam típicos.

Safety and Effectiveness of the Genous™ Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Capture Stent in the First Year Following ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Single Center Experience and Review of the Literature

PURPOSE: The Genous™ stent (GS) is designed to accelerate endothelization, which is potentially useful in the pro-thrombotic environment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the GS in the first year following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to compare our results with the few previously published studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients admitted to a single center due to STEMI that underwent primary PCI using exclusively GS, between May 2006 and January 2012, were enrolled. The primary study endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as the composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization, at one and 12months. RESULTS: In the cohort of 109 patients (73.4% male, 59 ±12years), 24.8% were diabetic. PCI was performed in 116 lesions with angiographic success in 99.1%, using 148 GS with median diameter of 3.00mm (2.50-4.00) and median length of 15mm (9-33). Cumulative MACEs were 2.8% at one month and 6.4% at 12months. Three stent thromboses (2.8%), all subacute, and one stent restenosis (0.9%) occurred. These accounted for the four target vessel revascularizations (3.7%). At 12months, 33.9% of patients were not on dual antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: GS was safe and effective in the first year following primary PCI in STEMI, with an apparently safer profile comparing with the previously published data. SUMMARY: We report the safety and effectiveness of the Genous™ stent (GS) in the first year following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. A comprehensive review of the few studies that have been published on this subject was included and some suggest a less safe profile of the GS. Our results and the critical review included may add information and reinforce the safety and effectiveness of the GS in ST-elevation in acute myocardial infarction.

Safety and Effectiveness of the Genous Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Capture Stent: Follow-Up to 5 Years

AIMS: To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Genous stent in an unselected population. METHODS: All patients admitted to a single center who underwent PCI using the GS exclusively, between May 2006 and May 2012, were enrolled, and a clinical follow-up of up to 60 months was carried out. The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was defined as the composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Of the 450 patients included (75.1% male; 65.5 ± 11.7 years), 28.4% were diabetic and acute coronary syndrome was the reason for PCI in 76.4%. Angioplasty was performed in 524 lesions using 597 Genous stents, with angiographic success in 97.1%. At a median of 36 months of follow-up (range, 1-75 months), MACE, AMI, TLR, stent restenosis (SR), and stent thrombosis (ST) rates were 15.6%, 8.4%, 4.4%, 3.8%, and 2.2%, respectively. Between 12 and 24 months, the TLR, SR, and ST rates practically stabilized, up to 60 months. Bifurcation lesions were independently associated with MACE, TLR, and SR. CONCLUSION: This is the first study reporting clinical results with the Genous stent up to 60 months. The Genous stent was safe and effective in the long-term, in an unselected population.