1 resultado para child labor in the informal sector
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (6)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (162)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (41)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (12)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (23)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (94)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (13)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (56)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (34)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (27)
- Duke University (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (8)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (47)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad del Pacífico - PERU (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (16)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (15)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (23)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (24)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (4)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (20)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (36)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (4)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (46)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (24)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with low concentrations of anesthetics is effective in reducing labor pain. The aim of this study was to assess and compare two ultra-low dose regimens of ropivacaine and sufentanil (0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0.06% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) on the intervals between boluses and the duration of labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this non-randomized prospective study, conducted between January and July 2010, two groups of parturients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Group I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) and Group II (n = 57; 0.6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Rescue doses of ropivacaine at the concentration of the assigned group without sufentanil were administered as necessary. Pain, local anesthetic requirements, neuraxial blockade characteristics, labor and neonatal outcomes, and maternal satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: The ropivacaine dose was greater in Group I (9.5 [7.7-12.7] mg.h-1 vs. 6.1 [5.1-9.8 mg.h-1], p < 0.001). A time increase between each bolus was observed in Group I (beta = 32.61 min, 95% CI [25.39; 39.82], p < 0.001), whereas a time decrease was observed in Group II (beta = -1.40 min, 95% CI [-2.44; -0.36], p = 0.009). The duration of the second stage of labor in Group I was significantly longer than that in Group II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Parturients receiving 0.06% ropivacaine exhibited less evidence of cumulative effects and exhibited faster second stage progression than those who received 0.1% ropivacaine.