Clinical Outcome and Morphologic Analysis after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Excluder Endograft

OBJECTIVE: Long-term follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is very scarce, and doubt remains regarding the durability of these procedures. We designed a retrospective cohort study to assess long-term clinical outcome and morphologic changes in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) treated by EVAR using the Excluder endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz). METHODS: From 2000 to 2007, 179 patients underwent EVAR in a tertiary institution. Clinical data were retrieved from a prospective database. All patients treated with the Excluder endoprosthesis were included. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans were retrospectively analyzed preoperatively, at 30 days, and at the last follow-up using dedicated tridimensional reconstruction software. For patients with complications, all remaining CTAs were also analyzed. The primary end point was clinical success. Secondary end points were freedom from reintervention, sac growth, types I and III endoleak, migration, conversion to open repair, and AAA-related death or rupture. Neck dilatation, renal function, and overall survival were also analyzed. RESULTS: Included were 144 patients (88.2% men; mean age, 71.6 years). Aneurysms were ruptured in 4.9%. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was III/IV in 61.8%. No patients were lost during a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 3.1-6.4; maximum, 11.2 years). Two patients died of medical complications ≤ 30 days after EVAR. The estimated primary clinical success rates at 5 and 10 years were 63.5% and 41.1%, and secondary clinical success rates were 78.3% and 58.3%, respectively. Sac growth was observed in 37 of 142 patients (26.1%). Cox regression showed type I endoleak during follow-up (hazard ratio, 3.74; P = .008), original design model (hazard ratio, 3.85; P = .001), and preoperative neck diameter (1.27 per mm increase, P = .006) were determinants of sac growth. Secondary interventions were required in 32 patients (22.5%). The estimated 10-year rate of AAA-related death or rupture was 2.1%. Overall life expectancy after AAA repair was 6.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR using the Excluder endoprosthesis provides a safe and lasting treatment for AAA, despite the need for maintained surveillance and secondary interventions. At up to 11 years, the risk of AAA-related death or postimplantation rupture is remarkably low. The incidences of postimplantation sac growth and secondary intervention were greatly reduced after the introduction of the low-permeability design in 2004.

A Idade é uma Variável Preditora da Funcionalidade após Acidente Vascular Cerebral? Um Estudo Multi-Análises

Existem diversos factores que podem influenciar o prognóstico funcional nos doentes com Acidente Vascular Cerebral (AVC), nomeadamente o hemisfério afectado, severidade do deficit neurológico inicial, presença de comorbilidades, etiologia, entre outros. A idade como factor preditivo na reabilitação destes doentes tem sido alvo de controvérsia. O objectivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a idade como variável preditiva de funcionalidade após AVC. Os autores recolheram retrospectivamente os dados dos processos clínicos dos doentes internados para reabilitação no Serviço de MFR do Hospital de Curry Cabral durante o ano de 2008, tendo como critério de inclusão diagnóstico de AVC. A funcionalidade foi avaliada à entrada e à saída do internamento, com a Medida de Independência Funcional (MIF) e o Índice de Barthel (IB). Os doentes com idade igual ou inferior a 45 anos foram considerados jovens adultos. Foi realizado o emparelhamento de doentes em casos-controlo. Para cada caso de AVC no adulto jovem os critérios de emparelhamento foram: idade> 45 anos, o mesmo tipo de AVC e hemisfério envolvido e igual MIF à entrada (mais ou menos três pontos). Para tratamento estatístico foi utilizado o programa SPSS 13.0. Foram recolhidos dados de 69 doentes com AVC, dos quais 12 foram considerados adultos jovens (38 +-5 anos). Quando comparados com os doentes mais velhos, os adultos jovens saíram com uma MIF maior (101 Vs 88 pontos; p=0,04), sem que se verificassem diferenças estatisticamente significativas em relação a: MIF à entrada, IB à entrada e saída, eficiência da MIF ou duração do internamento. A idade jovem associou-se com um melhor valor de MIF à saída (r=0,33, p=0,006), mesmo quando se controlou para a MIF à entrada (r=0,23, p=0,05). Em relação à análise dos nove pares caso-controlo, não se verificaram diferenças entre os grupos nas medidas de funcionalidade à entrada e à saída, nem na duração do internamento. A idade correlacionou-se com funcionalidade à saída, sendo que os doentes mais jovens saíram mais funcionais. No entanto, na análise caso-controlo, quando se controlou para outras variáveis (e.g. tipo de AVC), a variável perdeu o seu valor preditivo. Estes resultados podem dever-se ao facto de o AVC no jovem adulto ter diferentes características, como um maior número de eventos hemorrágicos. Nesta amostra, os jovens adultos tiveram igual número de AVC isquémicos e hemorrágicos (seis) e o grupo mais velho teve apenas 23% eventos hemorrágicos (p=0,07). É conhecido o melhor prognóstico funcional deste tipo de AVC, quando não associados a mortalidade precoce. Este estudo apresenta algumas limitações: o tamanho da amostra; o facto de a MIF e o IB não serem medidas de funcionalidade desenvolvidas especificamente para doentes com AVC; um viés de selecção, pois somente alguns doentes são incluídos em programa de reabilitação em internamento; o momento de avaliação da funcionalidade residual foi á saída do internamento, apenas algumas semanas pós-AVC. A idade jovem parece associar-se a um melhor prognóstico funcional. Este aspecto pode estar associado ao facto de o AVC nos doentes mais novos ter características diferentes (e.g. maior proporção de AVC hemorrágico), normalmente associadas a uma recuperação mais favorável.

Coronary Revascularization Induces a Shift From Cardiac Toward Noncardiac Mortality Without Improving Survival in Vascular Surgery Patient

OBJECTIVE: Although evidence has shown that ischemic heart disease (IHD) in vascular surgery patients has a negative impact on the prognosis after surgery, it is unclear whether directed treatment of IHD may influence cause-specific and overall mortality. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic implication of coronary revascularization (CR) on overall and cause-specific mortality in vascular surgery patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid artery stenosis, or peripheral artery disease in a university hospital in The Netherlands between January 2003 and December 2011 were retrospectively included. Survival estimates were obtained by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1104 patients were included. Adjusted survival analyses showed that IHD significantly increased the risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.87) and cardiovascular death (HR, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.76). Compared with those without CR, patients previously undergoing CR had similar overall mortality (HR, 1.38 vs 1.62; P = .274) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.83 vs 2.02; P = .656). Nonrevascularized IHD patients were more likely to die of IHD (6.9% vs 35.7%), whereas revascularized IHD patients more frequently died of cardiovascular causes unrelated to IHD (39.1% vs 64.3%; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the significance of IHD for postoperative survival of vascular surgery patients. CR was associated with lower IHD-related death rates. However, it failed to provide an overall survival benefit because of an increased rate of cardiovascular mortality unrelated to IHD. Intensification of secondary prevention regimens may be required to prevent this shift toward non-IHD-related death and thereby improve life expectancy.

Ocular Pulse Amplitude and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Glaucoma Patients

PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between ocular blood flow velocities and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in glaucoma patients using colour Doppler imaging (CDI) waveform analysis. METHOD: A prospective, observer-masked, case-control study was performed. OPA and blood flow variables from central retinal artery and vein (CRA, CRV), nasal and temporal short posterior ciliary arteries (NPCA, TPCA) and ophthalmic artery (OA) were obtained through dynamic contour tonometry and CDI, respectively. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to explore the correlations between OPA and retrobulbar CDI waveform and systemic cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, blood pressure amplitude, mean ocular perfusion pressure and peripheral pulse). RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two patients were included [healthy controls: 55; primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG): 74; normal-tension glaucoma (NTG): 63]. OPA was statistically different between groups (Healthy: 3.17 ± 1.2 mmHg; NTG: 2.58 ± 1.2 mmHg; POAG: 2.60 ± 1.1 mmHg; p < 0.01), but not between the glaucoma groups (p = 0.60). Multiple regression models to explain OPA variance were made for each cohort (healthy: p < 0.001, r = 0.605; NTG: p = 0.003, r = 0.372; POAG: p < 0.001, r = 0.412). OPA was independently associated with retrobulbar CDI parameters in the healthy subjects and POAG patients (healthy CRV resistance index: β = 3.37, CI: 0.16-6.59; healthy NPCA mean systolic/diastolic velocity ratio: β = 1.34, CI: 0.52-2.15; POAG TPCA mean systolic velocity: β = 0.14, CI 0.05-0.23). OPA in the NTG group was associated with diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate (β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.01; β = -0.04, CI: -0.06 to -0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular-related models provide a better explanation to OPA variance in healthy individuals than in glaucoma patients. The variables that influence OPA seem to be different in healthy, POAG and NTG patients.