Estudo Comparativo entre Dois Tipos de Eco-Contrastes: Echovist® e Levovist®, Avaliação da Permeabilidade Tubária em Infertilidade Feminina

Na propedêutica inicial do casal infértil, a realização da Sonossalpingografia (SoSG) contrastada através de dois tipos de ecocontrastes, Echovist® e Levovist®, durante a realização da ultra-sonografia ginecológica convencional pode, em casos seleccionados, substituir como exame de “screening” da permeabilidade tubária a Histerossalpingografia (HSG) e a Laparoscopia com cromotubação (LPC). Objectivos: Comparar os resultados da permeabilidade tubária através da SoSG contrastada com Echovist® ou com Levovist® e a HSG e determinar a sua acuidade em relação a LPC considerada “gold-standard”. Pacientes e métodos: Foram avaliadas prospectivamente 90 pacientes inférteis submetidas a SoSG em que se utilizou o contraste ecogénico Echovist® e 28 pacientes em que se utilizou o eco-realçador Levovist®. Para a HSG utilizou-se, em todas as pacientes, contraste iodado e hidrossolúvel Telebrix®. A observação da permeabilidade tubária teve sua avaliação final e sistemática pela LPC. Resultados: No estudo das trompas pelo Echovist® observamos permeabilidade em 67 pacientes (74,4%) e obstruções bilaterais em 23 das pacientes (25,6%) e pelo Levovist®, respectivamente, 22 (78,6%) e 6 pacientes (21,4%). Na comparação da avaliação da permeabilidade tubária entre a SoSG com Echovist® e LPC encontramos: especificidade € 91,3%, sensibilidade (S) 100%, falsos positivos (FP) 8,7%, falsos negativos (FN) 0%, valor preditivo positivo (VPP) 97,1%, valor preditivo negativo (VPN) 100% e Kappa de 96,5%, e entre a HSG e LPC, neste grupo Echovist® foram: E 100%, S 91,04%, FP 0%, FN 8,96%, VPP 100%, VPN 79,31% e Kappa de 88,6%. Na comparação da avaliação da permeabilidade tubária entre a SoSG com Levovist® e LPC encontramos: E 100%, S 100%, FP 0%, FN 0%, VPP 100%, VPN 100% e Kappa de 100%, e entre a HSG e LPC, no grupo Levovist® foram: E 100%, S 86,36%, FP 0%, FN 13,64%, VPP 100%, VPN 66,67% e Kappa de 82,2%. Conclusões: As Sonossalpingografias (SoSG) contrastadas utilizando-se como eco-realçadores o Echovist® ou o Levovist® podem ser consideradas exames complementares equivalentes na rotina da avaliação inicial do factor tubário por apresentarem, além do mesmo composto químico activo, alta sensibilidade, especificidade e concordância, ambos com acuidade superior à HSG quando comparados com a LPC.

Digit Ratio (2D:4D) in Newborns: Influences of Prenatal Testosterone and Maternal Environment

Introduction: The 2D:4D digit ratio is sexually-dimorphic, probably due to testosterone action through the perinatal period. We characterize the 2D:4D ratio in newborn (NB) infants, in between the pre- and postnatal surges of testosterone, and relate it to the mother's 2D:4D and to testosterone levels in the amniotic fluid (AF). Subjects and methods: Testosterone was assayed in samples of maternal plasma and AF collected at amniocentesis. Shortly after birth, 106 NBs and their mothers were measured for 2D:4D ratio. Results: NB males had lower mean 2D:4D ratios than females but this dimorphism was significant only for the left hand (males: 0.927; females: 0.950; p=0.004). Mothers who had sons had lower 2D:4D ratios than those who had daughters and the mother's 2D:4D were higher than those of NBs regardless of sex. Both hands of NB females were negatively correlated with AF testosterone and positively correlated with the mother's 2D:4D, but males showed no significant associations. Maternal plasma testosterone also showed a negative weak correlation with NB's digit ratio in both sexes. Conclusions: Sexual dimorphism at birth was only significant for the left hand, in contrast with reports of greater right hand dimorphism, suggesting that postnatal testosterone is determinant for 2D:4D stabilization. The lower 2D:4D ratios in mothers who had sons support claims that hormone levels in parents are influential for determining their children's sex. NB female's digit ratio, but not males', was associated to the level of AF testosterone. The mother's 2D:4D ratios were positively correlated with their daughters' 2D:4D, but the same was not observed for male NBs, suggesting that prenatal testosterone levels in male fetus lead their 2D:4D ratios to stray from their mothers' with high individual variability.

Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with low concentrations of anesthetics is effective in reducing labor pain. The aim of this study was to assess and compare two ultra-low dose regimens of ropivacaine and sufentanil (0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0.06% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) on the intervals between boluses and the duration of labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this non-randomized prospective study, conducted between January and July 2010, two groups of parturients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Group I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) and Group II (n = 57; 0.6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Rescue doses of ropivacaine at the concentration of the assigned group without sufentanil were administered as necessary. Pain, local anesthetic requirements, neuraxial blockade characteristics, labor and neonatal outcomes, and maternal satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: The ropivacaine dose was greater in Group I (9.5 [7.7-12.7] mg.h-1 vs. 6.1 [5.1-9.8 mg.h-1], p < 0.001). A time increase between each bolus was observed in Group I (beta = 32.61 min, 95% CI [25.39; 39.82], p < 0.001), whereas a time decrease was observed in Group II (beta = -1.40 min, 95% CI [-2.44; -0.36], p = 0.009). The duration of the second stage of labor in Group I was significantly longer than that in Group II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Parturients receiving 0.06% ropivacaine exhibited less evidence of cumulative effects and exhibited faster second stage progression than those who received 0.1% ropivacaine.