Optimization of the Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase Detection by Histochemical Method

According to the new KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines, the term of renal osteodystrophy, should be used exclusively in reference to the invasive diagnosis of bone abnormalities. Due to the low sensitivity and specificity of biochemical serum markers of bone remodelling,the performance of bone biopsies is highly stimulated in dialysis patients and after kidney transplantation. The tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP) is an iso-enzyme of the group of acid phosphatases, which is highly expressed by activated osteoclasts and macrophages. TRACP in osteoclasts is in intracytoplasmic vesicles that transport the products of bone matrix degradation. Being present in activated osteoclasts, the identification of this enzyme by histochemistry in undecalcified bone biopsies is an excellent method to quantify the resorption of bone. Since it is an enzymatic histochemical method for a thermolabile enzyme, the temperature at which it is performed is particularly relevant. This study aimed to determine the optimal temperature for identification of TRACP in activated osteoclasts in undecalcified bone biopsies embedded in methylmethacrylate. We selected 10 cases of undecalcified bone biopsies from hemodialysis patients with the diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Sections of 5 μm were stained to identify TRACP at different incubation temperatures (37º, 45º, 60º, 70º and 80ºC) for 30 minutes. Activated osteoclasts stained red and trabecular bone (mineralized bone) was contrasted with toluidine blue. This approach also increased the visibility of the trabecular bone resorption areas (Howship lacunae). Unlike what is suggested in the literature and in several international protocols, we found that the best results were obtained with temperatures between 60ºC and 70ºC. For technical reasons and according to the results of the present study, we recommended that, for an incubation time of 30 minutes, the reaction should be carried out at 60ºC. As active osteoclasts are usually scarce in a bone section, the standardization of the histochemistry method is of great relevance, to optimize the identification of these cells and increase the accuracy of the histomosphometric results. Our results, allowing an increase in osteoclasts contrast, also support the use of semi-automatic histomorphometric measurements.

The Oncological and Functional Risks of the Organ Preservation Experimental Treatment Approach

We increasingly face conservative surgery for rectal cancer and even the so called ‘wait and see’ approach, as far as 10–20% patients can reach a complete pathological response at the time of surgery. But what can we say to our patients about risks? Standard surgery with mesorectal excision gives a <2% local recurrence with a post operative death rate of 2–8% (may reach 30% at 6 months in those over 85), but low AR has some deterioration in bowel function and in low cancer a permanent stoma may be required. Also a long-term impact on urinary and sexual function is possible. Distant metastasis rate seem to be identical in the standard and conservative approach. It is difficult to evaluate conservative approach because a not clear standardization of surgery for low rectal cancer. Rullier et al tried to clarify, and they found identical results for recurrence (5–9%), disease free survival (70%) at 5y for coloanal anastomosis and intersphinteric resection. Other series have found local recurrence higher than with standard approach and functional results may be worse and, in some situations, salvage therapy is compromised or has more complications. In this context, functional outcomes are very important but most studies are incomplete in measuring bowel function in the context of conservative approach. In 2005 Temple et al made a survey of 122/184 patient after sphinter preserving surgery and found a 96.9% of incomplete evacuation, 94.4% clustering, 93.2% food affecting frequency, 91.8% gas incontinence and proposed a systematic evaluation with a specific questionnaire. In which concerns ‘Wait and see’ approach for complete clinical responders, it was first advocated by Habr Gama for tumors up to 7cm, with a low locoregional failure of 4.6%, 5y overall survival 96%, 72% for disease free survival; one fifth of patients failed in the first year; a Dutch trial had identical results but others had worse recurrence rates; in other series 25% of patients could not be salvaged even with APR; 30% have subsequent metastatic disease what seems equal for ‘wait and see’ and operated patients. In a recent review Glynne Jones considers that all the evaluated ‘wait and see’ studies are heterogeneous in staging, inclusion criteria, design and follow up after chemoradiation and that there is the suggestion that patients who progress while under observation fare worse than those resected. He proposes long-term observational studies with more uniform inclusion criteria. We are now facing a moment where we may be more aggressive in early cancer and neoadjuvant treatment to be more conservative in the subsequent treatment but we need a better stratification of patients, better evaluation of results and more clear prognostic markers.

Consulta de Úlcera de Perna do Hospital de Santa Marta

Leg ulcers constitute a highly prevalent pathology in society, and are particularly common in the Angiology and Vascular Surgery outpatient clinic. The prevalence of these patients in this Department result from the fact that 70% of them display superficial and/or deep venous insufficiency of the lower limbs. To address this problem and optimize the therapeutic approaches available to the Chronic Leg Ulcer (CLU) patients, the Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery has created, in March 2005, an appointment specific to CLU patients. An evaluation protocol was developed, including ulcer characterization, standardization of the conservative treatment, followed by surgical intervention, whenever required. The results obtained were evaluated 18 months after the onset of this protocol. Analysis of the results revealed that the majority of the patients responded positively to the new therapeutic approach, with closure of the ulcer in 43% of the patients and a significant improvement detected for an additional 30%. Furthermore, it was observed that a detailed evaluation of these patients should be regarded as a whole, followed by a standardized and targeted approach, resulting in a particularly successful approach on the treatment of this pathology.

Asma de Esforço na Criança - Contributos para a Normalização das Provas de Provocação

A asma induzida pelo exercício (AIE), apesar de entidade muito prevalente na criança asmática,apresenta aspectos etiopatogénicos não totalmente esclarecidos. De igual modo, os aspectos metodológicos das provas de provocação utilizadas para o diagnóstico da AIE não estão normalizados. Objectivos: Foram objectivos deste trabalho estudar sensibilidade e especificidade de diferentes parâmetros funcionais (DEMI vs VEMS) e equipamentos(bicicleta ergométrica vs tapete rolante) utilizados nas provas de esforço, monitorizar a ocorrência de respostas tardias ao esforço e correlacionar os resultados com os de uma prova de provocação brônquica inespecífica normalizada (metacolina). Métodos: Foram incluídas 22 crianças com asma e 10 com rinite (grupo controle), com 7-15 anos. Todas as crianças foram submetidas a três provas de provocação efectuadas no intervalo de 1 mês, provas de esforço em tapete rolante (T) e com bicicleta ergométrica (B) e prova de metacolina, efectuadas sob condições ambientais controladas e com interrupção da medicação relevante. Resultados: Sensibilidade: T - redução VEMS >=10%=82%; B - redução VEMS>=10%=57%; T - redução DEMI>=10%=86%; B - redução DEMI >=10%=81%. Especificidade: T & B - redução VEMS >=10%=100%; T - redução DEMI>=10%=40%; B - redução DEMI>=10%=33%. Não se identificaram respostas broncoconstritoras tardias ao exercício. As crianças asmáticas com prova de esforço positiva apresentaram uma reactividade à metacolina significativamente superior à dos asmáticos com prova negativa.Conclusões: A prova de esforço em tapete rolante representa o melhor teste para diagnóstico da AIE na criança. O parâmetro funcional normalizado a ser utilizado deverá ser o VEMS, aceitando-se uma redução de 10% como critério de positividade. Os doentes com resposta positiva ao esforço foram igualmente mais reactivos à prova de metacolina, isto é apresentam hiperreactividade brônquica inespecífica mais grave, o que substancia o interesse da terapêutica preventiva anti-inflamatória com corticóides tópicos e/ou antileucotrienos no controle da AIE.