Cancer Rehabilitation Indicators for Europe

Little is known of cancer rehabilitation needs in Europe. EUROCHIP-3 organised a group of experts to propose a list of population-based indicators used for describing cancer rehabilitation across Europe. The aim of this study is to present and discuss these indicators. A EUROCHIP-3 expert panel reached agreement on two types of indicators. (a) Cancer prevalence indicators. These were proposed as a means of characterising the burden of cancer rehabilitation needs by time from diagnosis and patient health status. These indicators can be estimated from cancer registry data or by collecting data on follow-up and treatments for samples of cases archived in cancer registries. (b) Indicators of rehabilitation success. These include: return to work, quality of life, and satisfaction of specific rehabilitation needs. Studies can be performed to estimate these indicators in individual countries, but to obtain comparable data across European countries it will be necessary to administer a questionnaire to randomly selected samples of patients from population-based cancer registry databases. However, three factors complicate questionnaire studies: patients may not be aware that they have cancer; incomplete participation in surveys could lead to bias; and national confidentiality laws in some cases prohibit cancer registries from approaching patients. Although these studies are expensive and difficult to perform, but as the number of cancer survivors increases, it is important to document their needs in order to provide information on cancer control.

Neuromyelitis Optica in Portugal (NEMIPORT) - A Multicentre Study

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS. There have been few epidemiologic studies on NMO, none in Portugal. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical, biological and MRI characteristics from a cohort of Portuguese patients who fulfilled the Wingerchuk 2006 NMO/NMOSD criteria. To identify and characterize those who had concomitant autoimmune disease or circulating autoantibodies. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study in 5 Hospital Centers in Portugal. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were mainly Caucasian, 55 female. Median age at onset was 32.0 years and mean follow-up 7.4±6.0 years. Twenty-one patients were definite NMO and optic neuritis (ON) the most frequent initial presentation. Forty-six were classified as NMO spectrum disorders. The main subtypes were recurrent ON and single longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Twenty-four patients had positive AQP4-IgG. Twenty-three had other circulating autoantibodies. Fifteen out of 67 patients had concomitant autoimmune disease. There was a significant correlation between the presence of autoimmune disease and the positivity for AQP4-IgG. Five patients died, all definite NMO. CONCLUSION: This is the first study about this rare disease in Portugal. Demographic features were similar to other studies. The existence of concomitant autoimmune disease was significantly associated with seropositivity for AQP4-IgG.