1 resultado para Practices and representations
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (25)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (21)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (56)
- Brock University, Canada (19)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (67)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (17)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (14)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (27)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (39)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (8)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (10)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (40)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (3)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (57)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (18)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (20)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade do Minho (7)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (5)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (12)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (44)
- Université de Montréal (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (31)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (40)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (27)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (6)
Resumo:
INTRODUCTION: Labour is considered to be one of the most painful and significant experiences in a woman's life. The aim of this study was to examine whether women's attachment style is a predictor of the pain experienced throughout labour and post-delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Thirty-two pregnant women were assessed during the third trimester of pregnancy and during labour. Adult attachment was assessed with the Adult Attachment Scale ' Revised. The perceived intensity of labour pain was measured using a visual analogue scale for pain in the early stage of labour, throughout labour and post-delivery. RESULTS:Women with an insecure attachment style reported more pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation (p < 0.05), before the administration of analgesia (p < 0.01) and post-delivery (p < 0.05) than those securely attached. In multivariate models, attachment style was a significant predictor of labour pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation and before the first administration of analgesia but not of the perceived pain post-delivery. DISCUSSION: These findings confirm that labour pain is influenced by relevant psychological factors and suggest that a woman's attachment style may be a risk factor for greater pain during labour. CONCLUSION:Future studies in the context of obstetric pain may consider the attachment style as an indicator of individual differences in the pain response during labour. This may have important implications in anaesthesiology and to promote a relevant shift in institutional practices and therapeutic procedures.