Tratamento da Co-Infecção do Vírus da Hepatite B e C. Resposta Excedida

Os vírus da hepatite B (VHB) e da hepatite C (VHC) constituem a causa mais frequente de doença hepática crónica. A partilha de vias de transmissão contribui para o risco de coinfecção VHB-VHC. Nos doentes co-infectados com o VHB e VHC verifica-se uma progressão mais rápida para a cirrose hepática e existe um risco aumentado para o carcinoma hepatocelular. A terapêutica da co-infecção VHB/VHC é empírica, consistindo na indicada para a infecção exclusiva pelo VHC, o qual, na maioria dos casos, é o vírus dominante. A utilização do tratamento padrão para a hepatite C, nomeadamente interferão alfa peguilado e ribavirina, não mostra diferenças significativas na resposta virológica sustentada ao VHC comparativamente com a dos monoinfectados pelo VHC. É incerto o benefício da associação de análogos dos nucleós(t)idos. A acção terapêutica pode modificar a interacção entre os dois vírus e, designadamente, exacerbar a doença por reactivação do VHB. Os autores apresentam o caso clínico de uma doente com co-infecção VHB-VHC, sem reconhecimento de vírus dominante, em que a resposta à terapêutica instituída superou a expectativa da evidência científica disponível.

Prophylactic Use of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Preventing Fungal Infections Early After Liver Transplantation: a Retrospective, Single-Center Study

In this study the authors evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in the incidence of fungal infections (FI) during the first 3 months after liver transplant (LT). The study was retrospective and accessed a 4-year period from 2008 to 2011. All patients who died in the first 48 hours after LT were excluded. Patients were divided by the risk groups for FI: Group 1, high-risk (at least 1 of the following conditions: urgent LT; serum creatinine >2 mg/dL; early acute kidney injury [AKI] after LT; retransplantation; surgical exploration early post-LT; transfused cellular blood components [>40 U]); and Group 2, low-risk patients. Group 1 patients were further separated into those who received antifungal prophylaxis with L-AmB and those who did not. Prophylaxis with L-AmB consisted of intravenous administration of L-AmB, 100 mg daily for 14 days. Four hundred ninety-two patients underwent LT; 31 died in the first 48 hours after LT. From the remaining 461 patients, 104 presented with high-risk factors for FI (Group 1); of these, 66 patients received antifungal prophylaxis and 38 did not. In this group 8 FI were observed, 5 in patients without antifungal prophylaxis (P = .011). Three more FI were identified in Group 2. By logistic regression analysis, the categorical variable high-risk group was independently related to the occurrence of invasive FI (P = .006). We conclude that prophylaxis with L-AmB after LT was effective in reducing the incidence of FI. No influence on mortality was detected.