6 resultados para P-Value
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE: We set out to evaluate whether changes in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (proBNP) can predict changes in functional capacity, as determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS: We studied 37 patients with CHF due to DCM, 81% non-ischemic, 28 male, who performed symptom-limited treadmill CPET, with the modified Bruce protocol, in two consecutive evaluations, with determination of proBNP after 10 minutes rest prior to CPET. The time between evaluations was 9.6+/-5.5 months, and age at first evaluation was 41.1+/-13.9 years (21 to 67). RESULTS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND EVALUATIONS RESPECTIVELY WERE: NYHA functional class >II 51% and 16% (p<0.001), sinus rhythm 89% and 86.5% (NS), left ventricular ejection fraction 24.9+/-8.9% and 26.6+/-8.6% (NS), creatinine 1.03+/-0.25 and 1.09+/-0.42 mg/dl (NS), taking ACE inhibitors or ARBs 94.5% and 100% (NS), beta-blockers 73% and 97.3% (p<0.001), and spironolactone 89% and 89% (NS). We analyzed the absolute and percentage variation (AV and PV) in peak oxygen uptake (pVO2--ml/kg/min) and proBNP (pg/ml) between the two evaluations. RESULTS: (1) pVO2 AV: -17.4 to 15.2 (1.9+/-5.7); pVO2 PV: -56.1 to 84% (11.0+/-25.2); proBNP AV: -12850 to 5983 (-778.4+/-3332.5); proBNP PV: -99.0 to 379.5% (-8.8+/-86.3); (2) The correlations obtained--r value and p value [r (p)]--are shown in the table below; (3) We considered that a coefficient of variation of pVO2 PV of >10% represented a significant change in functional capacity. On ROC curve analysis, a proBNP PV value of 28% showed 80% sensitivity and 79% specificity for pVO2 PV of >10% (AUC=0.876, p=0.01, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHF due to DCM, changes in proBNP values correlate with variations in pVO2, as assessed by CPET. However, our results suggest that only a proBNP PV of >28% predicts a significant change in functional capacity.
Resumo:
Introdução: Um terço das mulheres com diabetes gestacional terá o diagnóstico de diabetes ou alteração do metabolismo da glicose no rastreio pós-parto. Objectivo: Avaliar a percentagem de mulheres submetidas a rastreio pós-parto e associar o resultado com a história materna. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de 1013 gravidezes com diabetes gestacional (2005-2009). Dividiu-se a população em dois grupos de acordo com o resultado: normal (grupo 1) e com diabetes ou alteração do metabolismo da glicose (grupo 2). Para ambos os grupos foram avaliados: idade materna, índice de massa corporal, ganho de peso na gravidez, idade gestacional do diagnóstico, necessidade de administração de insulina, factores de risco para diabetes gestacional e peso do recém-nascido. Resultados: O rastreio pós-parto foi realizado em 76,8% das mulheres (n=778). O teste foi considerado normal (grupo 1) em 628 mulheres(80,7%) e alterado (grupo 2) em 150 mulheres (19,3%). O Grupo 2 teve mulheres mais velhas (idade média de 34 vs 33 anos;p-value 0,013), com maior índice de massa corporal (28,5 vs 25,8kg / cm2; p-value 0,000), maior número de mulheres com história familiar em primeiro grau de diabetes mellitus (50,3% vs 39,9%; p-value 0,026) e história pessoal de macrossomia prévia (12,1% vs 5,4%; p-value 0,003). O diagnóstico mais precoce da diabetes gestacional foi também feito nesse grupo (27 vs 31 semanas; p-value 0,000) e uma maior percentagem efectuou insulina (41% vs 15%; p-value 0,000), tendo iniciado mais cedo a sua administração (28 vs 30 semanas; p-value 0,010). Verificou-se uma maior percentagem de grávidas multíparas no grupo 2 (64% vs 49,4%; p-value = 0,001) e um maior número de casos de recém-nascidos grandes para a idade gestacional (17,1% vs 8,3%; p-value = 0,001). A história pessoal de diabetes gestacional e ganho de peso durante a gestação foi semelhante nos dois grupos. Conclusões: As mulheres com alteração nos resultados do rastreio pós-parto são geralmente mais velhas, mais pesadas, multíparas, com história familiar em primeiro grau de diabetes Mellitus e história pessoal de macrossomia prévia. O diagnóstico de diabetes gestacional foi mais precoce neste grupo, mais frequentemente necessitaram de terapêutica com insulina com início mais cedo e verificou-se um maior número de recém-nascidos grandes para a idade gestacional.
Resumo:
Introdução: Há estudos que revelam que a Hemoglobina A1c (HbA1c) é um indicador confiável do controlo glicémico em grávidas com diabetes gestacional (DG). Objetivo: Relacionar os níveis de HbA1c no terceiro trimestre e o prognóstico materno-fetal. Tipo de estudo: Retrospetivo. População: Quatrocentos e setenta e quatro mulheres vigiadas na consulta de diabetes e gravidez com o diagnóstico de DG. Métodos: Dividiu-se a população em dois grupos: HbA1c <6% (grupo um) e HbA1c ≥6% (grupo dois). Foram avaliados: fatores de risco para diabetes gestacional, ganho de peso na gravidez, idade gestacional (IG) do diagnóstico, complicações na gravidez, administração de insulina, IG no parto, peso ao nascer e resultado do rastreio pós-parto. Resultados: No grupo um obteve-se 420 mulheres e no grupo dois 54. O grupo dois havia mulheres com maior IMC (27 vs 29 kg / cm2; p-value 0,007), história pessoal de diabetes gestacional(14,3% vs 27,6%; p-value 0,004) e macrossomia prévia (7,6% vs 14,8%; p-value 0,039). Neste mesmo grupo uma maior percentagem de grávidas efetuou insulina (28,6% vs 48,1%; p-value 0,005) e apresentou maior ganho de peso durante a gravidez (24,8% vs 55,6%; p-value 0,000). Verificou-se um maior número de casos de recém-nascidos grandes para a IG (6,7% vs 20,4%; p-value = 0,002) e uma maior percentagem de mulheres apresentou alteração no rastreio pós-parto (15,8% vs 47,5%; p-value = 0,000). Conclusões: As mulheres com valores de HbA1c ≥6% são mais pesadas, com história pessoal de DG e macrossomia prévia, mais frequentemente necessitaram de terapêutica com insulina e apresentam maior ganho de peso. Verificou-se um maior número de casos de recém-nascidos grandes para a IG e uma maior percentagem de mulheres apresentou alteração no rastreio pós-parto.
Resumo:
We examined the longitudinal changes of VEGF levels after percutaneous coronary intervention for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. VEGF was measured in 94 CAD patients' serum before revascularization, 1-month and 1-year after. Independently of clinical presentation, patients had lower VEGF concentration than a cohort of healthy subjects (median, IQ: 15.9, 9.0-264 pg/mL versus 419, 212-758 pg/mL; P < 0.001) at baseline. VEGF increased to 1-month (median, IQ: 276, 167-498 pg/mL; P < 0.001) and remained steady to 1-year (median, IQ: 320, 173-497 pg/mL; P < 0.001) approaching control levels. Drug eluting stent apposition and previous medication intake produced a less steep VEGF evolution after intervention (P < 0.05). Baseline VEGF concentration <40.8 pg/mL conveyed increased risk for MACE in a 5-year follow-up. Results reflect a positive role of VEGF in recovery and support its importance in CAD prognosis.
Resumo:
INTRODUCTION: Insulin resistance is the pathophysiological key to explain metabolic syndrome. Although clearly useful, the Homeostasis Model Assessment index (an insulin resistance measurement) hasn't been systematically applied in clinical practice. One of the main reasons is the discrepancy in cut-off values reported in different populations. We sought to evaluate in a Portuguese population the ideal cut-off for Homeostasis Model Assessment index and assess its relationship with metabolic syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected a cohort of individuals admitted electively in a Cardiology ward with a BMI < 25 Kg/m2 and no abnormalities in glucose metabolism (fasting plasma glucose < 100 mg/dL and no diabetes). The 90th percentile of the Homeostasis Model Assessment index distribution was used to obtain the ideal cut-off for insulin resistance. We also selected a validation cohort of 300 individuals (no exclusion criteria applied). RESULTS: From 7 000 individuals, and after the exclusion criteria, there were left 1 784 individuals. The 90th percentile for Homeostasis Model Assessment index was 2.33. In the validation cohort, applying that cut-off, we have 49.3% of individuals with insulin resistance. However, only 69.9% of the metabolic syndrome patients had insulin resistance according to that cut-off. By ROC curve analysis, the ideal cut-off for metabolic syndrome is 2.41. Homeostasis Model Assessment index correlated with BMI (r = 0.371, p < 0.001) and is an independent predictor of the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR 19.4, 95% CI 6.6 - 57.2, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Our study showed that in a Portuguese population of patients admitted electively in a Cardiology ward, 2.33 is the Homeostasis Model Assessment index cut-off for insulin resistance and 2.41 for metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSION: Homeostasis Model Assessment index is directly correlated with BMI and is an independent predictor of metabolic syndrome.
Resumo:
Background: Economic evaluations help health authorities facing budget constraints. This study compares the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and costs in patient subgroups on haemodialysis (HD) and renal transplantation (KT). Methods: In a prospective study with follow-up of 1-3 years, we performed a costutility analysis of KT vs. HD, adopting a lifetime horizon. A societal perspective was taken. Costs for organ procurement, KT eligibility, transplant surgery and follow-up of living donors were included. Key clinical events were recorded. HRQOL was assessed using the EuroQol instrument. Results: The HRQOL remained stable on HD patients. After KT, mean utility score improved at 3 months while mean EQ-VAS scores showed a sustained improvement. Mean annual cost for HD was 32,567.57€. Mean annual costs for KT in the year-1 and in subsequent years were, 60,210.09€ and 12,956.77€ respectively. Cost for initial hospitalization averaged 18,740.74€. HLA-mismatches increased costs by 75% for initial hospitalization (p < 0.001) and 41% in the year-1 (p < 0.05), and duplicate the risk of readmission in the year-1 (p < 0.05). The incremental costutility ratio was 5,534.46€/QALY, increasing 35% when costs for organ procurement were added. KT costs were 41,541.63€ more but provided additional 7.51 QALY. Conclusions: The KT is cost-effective compared with HD. Public funding should reflect the value created by the intervention and adapt to the organ demand.