Neurofibromatose do Tipo 1 - Proposta de Protocolo de Seguimento

A Neurofibromatose tipo a (NF1) é uma doença multissistémica de carácter progressivo. Tem uma expressão fenotípica muito variada, sem factores preditivos de gravidade. Objectivos: caracterizar a população pediátrica com NF! seguida na consulta de Neurologia Pediátrica no Hospital de Dona Estefânia (HDE) e os principais motivos de referência; definir um protocolo de seguimento; definir critérios de referenciação para o neuropediatra. Material e Métodos: realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo e longitudinal através da consulta dos processos clínicos. Incluiu todas as crianças com critérios de diagnóstico de NF1 de acordo com National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference criteria de 1988. Os dados foram comparados com outras séries recentes. Resultados: São 28 as crianças com critérios de diagnóstico de NF1, 15 (53%) do sexo feminino e 17 (60,7%) com anetecendentes familiares de NF1. A média da idade do diagnóstico é de 3,6 +-3,3 anos (3m-14a) e a idade actual é de 8 +-7,05 anos (11m-15a). O principal motivo de referenciação à consulta de Neurologia foi um pedido de orientação face à presença de manchas "café cpm leite", que estiveram presentes em 100% dos casos. a epilepsia ocorreu em 4 (14,2%)crianças, com crises parciais complexas. Surgiram complicações graves em 7 crianças (25%): tumor do SNC (3); linfoma (1); pseudoartrose da tíbia (1); epilepsia refractária (1); neurofibroma retroperitoneal (1).

Tumors of the Brachial Plexus in a Tertiary Referral Center: a Case Series and Literature Review

Introduction: Brachial plexus (BP) tumors are very rare tumors, with less than 800 cases been described in the literature worldwide since 1970. These tumors often present as local or radicular pain, with scant or no neurological deficits. These symptoms are shared by many other more common rheumatologic diseases, thus making their diagnosis difficult in most cases. Additionally, these tumors often present as lumps and are therefore biopsied, which carries a significant risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. Material and Methods: In this paper the authors describe their experience with the management of 5 patients with BP tumors followed up for at least 2 years. There were 4 males and 1 female. Median follow-up time was 41 ± 21 months. Average age at diagnosis was 40,0 ± 19,9 years. The most common complaints at presentation were pain and sensibility changes. All patients had a positive Tinel sign when the lesion was percussed. In all patients surgery was undertaken and the tumors removed. In 4 patients nerve integrity was maintained. In one patient with excruciating pain a segment of the nerve had to be excised and the nerve defect was bridged with sural nerve grafts. Results: Pathology examination of the resected specimens revealed a Schwannoma in 4 cases and a neurofibroma in the patient submitted to segmental nerve resection. Two years postoperatively, no recurrences were observed. All patients revealed clinical improvement. The patient submitted to nerve resection had improvement in pain, but presented diminished strength and sensibility in the involved nerve territory. Conclusion: Surgical excision of BP tumors is not a risk free procedure. Most authors suggest surgery if the lesion is symptomatic or progressing in size. If the tumor is stationary and not associated with neurological dysfunction a conservative approach should be taken.