Pilosidade Púbica na Criança e Hiperplasia Congénita Supra-Renal Não Clássica

Antes dos 8 anos de idade no sexo feminino e dos 9 no masculino, o aparecimento de pelos púbicos, pode ser a primeira manifestação de doença das gónadas ou das supra-renais. Para reconhecimento da Hiperplasia congénita supra-renal de início tardio, em situações de Pubarca prematura, realizámos a Prova curta de estimulação da supra-renal com Synacthen, em trinta crianças. Cinco meninas e um rapaz revelaram um défice de 21-hidroxilase, demonstrado pelo valores da 17-OH Progesterona sérica aos 60 minutos;28,8 +_ 15,2ng/ml, sendo num grupo de controle 2,30 ng/ml (p<0,01). A incidência de 20% encontrada, justifica a realização desta prova em todas as Pubarcas prematuras.

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Prostate Enlargement

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare baseline data and clinical outcome between patients with prostate enlargement/benign prostatic hyperplasia (PE/BPH) who underwent unilateral and bilateral prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) for the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS: This single-center, ambispective cohort study compared 122 consecutive patients (mean age 66.7 years) with unilateral versus bilateral PAE from March 2009 to December 2011. Selective PAE was performed with 100- and 200-μm nonspherical polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles by a unilateral femoral approach. RESULTS: Bilateral PAE was performed in 103 (84.4 %) patients (group A). The remaining 19 (15.6 %) patients underwent unilateral PAE (group B). Mean follow-up time was 6.7 months in group A and 7.3 months in group B. Mean prostate volume, PSA, International prostate symptom score/quality of life (IPSS/QoL) and post-void residual volume (PVR) reduction, and peak flow rate (Qmax) improvement were 19.4 mL, 1.68 ng/mL, 11.8/2.0 points, 32.9 mL, and 3.9 mL/s in group A and 11.5 mL, 1.98 ng/mL, 8.9/1.4 points, 53.8 mL, and 4.58 mL/s in group B. Poor clinical outcome was observed in 24.3 % of patients from group A and 47.4 % from group B (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: PAE is a safe and effective technique that can induce 48 % improvement in the IPSS score and a prostate volume reduction of 19 %, with good clinical outcome in up to 75 % of treated patients. Bilateral PAE seems to lead to better clinical results; however, up to 50 % of patients after unilateral PAE may have a good clinical outcome.

Prostatic Arterial Embolization to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) might be a feasible procedure to treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (age range, 62-82 years; mean age, 74.1 y) with symptomatic BPH after failure of medical treatment were selected for PAE with nonspherical 200-μm polyvinyl alcohol particles. The procedure was performed by a single femoral approach. Technical success was considered when selective prostatic arterial catheterization and embolization was achieved on at least one pelvic side. RESULTS: PAE was technically successful in 14 of the 15 patients (93.3%). There was a mean follow-up of 7.9 months (range, 3-12 months). International Prostate Symptom Score decreased a mean of 6.5 points (P = .005), quality of life improved 1.14 points (P = .065), International Index of Erectile Function increased 1.7 points (P = .063), and peak urinary flow increased 3.85 mL/sec (P = .015). There was a mean prostate-specific antigen reduction of 2.27 ng/mL (P = .072) and a mean prostate volume decrease of 26.5 mL (P = .0001) by ultrasound and 28.9 mL (P = .008) by magnetic resonance imaging. There was one major complication (a 1.5-cm(2) ischemic area of the bladder wall) and four clinical failures (28.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In this small group of patients, PAE was a feasible procedure, with preliminary results and short-term follow-up suggesting good symptom control without sexual dysfunction in suitable candidates, associated with a reduction in prostate volume.

Locally Advanced and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Intermittent Androgen Monotherapy or Maximal Androgen Blockade: Results from a Randomised Phase 3 Study by the South European Uroncological Group

BACKGROUND: Few randomised studies have compared antiandrogen intermittent hormonal therapy (IHT) with continuous maximal androgen blockade (MAB) therapy for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether overall survival (OS) on IHT (cyproterone acetate; CPA) is noninferior to OS on continuous MAB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 3 randomised trial compared IHT and continuous MAB in patients with locally advanced or metastatic PCa. INTERVENTION: During induction, patients received CPA 200 mg/d for 2 wk and then monthly depot injections of a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH; triptoreline 11.25 mg) analogue plus CPA 200 mg/d. Patients whose prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was <4 ng/ml after 3 mo of induction treatment were randomised to the IHT arm (stopped treatment and restarted on CPA 300 mg/d monotherapy if PSA rose to ≥20 ng/ml or they were symptomatic) or the continuous arm (CPA 200 mg/d plus monthly LHRH analogue). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcome measurement was OS. Secondary outcomes included cause-specific survival, time to subjective or objective progression, and quality of life. Time off therapy in the intermittent arm was recorded. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We recruited 1045 patients, of which 918 responded to induction therapy and were randomised (462 to IHT and 456 to continuous MAB). OS was similar between groups (p=0.25), and noninferiority of IHT was demonstrated (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.07). There was a trend for an interaction between PSA and treatment (p=0.05), favouring IHT over continuous therapy in patients with PSA ≤1 ng/ml (HR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02). Men treated with IHT reported better sexual function. Among the 462 patients on IHT, 50% and 28% of patients were off therapy for ≥2.5 yr or >5 yr, respectively, after randomisation. The main limitation is that the length of time for the trial to mature means that other therapies are now available. A second limitation is that T3 patients may now profit from watchful waiting instead of androgen-deprivation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Noninferiority of IHT in terms of survival and its association with better sexual activity than continuous therapy suggest that IHT should be considered for use in routine clinical practice.

Importância da Prova de Synacthen no Diagnóstico Diferencial de Pubarca Precoce

Introdução: Nos doentes com pubarca precoce, o gold-standard para o diagnóstico diferencial entre pubarca precoce idiopática (PPI) e a forma não clássica da hiperplasia congénita da suprarrenal (HCSR--NC) é a prova de Synacthen. Esta permite também estimar a reserva adrenal de cortisol nos doentes com HCSR-NC.Objetivos: Comparar as características clínicas e perfil hormonal basal dos doentes com pubarca pre-coce; avaliar a importância da prova de Synacthen no diagnóstico diferencial entre PPI e HCSR-NC e na determinação da reserva adrenal de cortisol. Material e métodos: Estudo transversal de doentes com pubarca precoce que realizaram prova de Synacthen. Resultados: Foram incluídos 43 doentes, com idade mediana de 7,5 anos (3,5-9,4), sendo 37 (86,0%) do sexo feminino. Na prova de Synacthen, 37 (86,0%) foram classificados como PPI e 6 (14,0%) como HCSR-NC.Não houve diferencças significativas entre os 2 grupos quanto às características clínicas e doseamentos basais de ACTH, cortisol e androgénios da suprarrenal. A 17-OHP basal e estimulada foi mais elevada nos doentes com HCSR-NC (p = 0,001 e p < 0,001, respetivamente) (basal: 4,62 ± 3,70 ng/ml [0,80-10,50];estimulada: 35,41 ± 24,87 ng/ml [12,0-80,2]) do que nos doentes com PPI (basal: 1,04 ± 0,77 ng/ml [0,22-3,80]; estimulada: 4,18 ± 1,71 ng/ml [1,0-8,96]). O cut-off basal habitualmente proposto (< 2,0 ng/ml) paraa distinção entre estes grupos não o permitiu em 2 doentes, que apenas foram diagnosticados após realização da prova de Synacthen. Dois doentes com HCSR-NC (33,3%) tiveram cortisol após estimulação< 18 g/dl, revelando necessidade de tratamento com glucocorticoide em stress. Os doentes com HCSR--NC com valores mais elevados de 17-OHP basal tiveram valores de cortisol mais baixos após estimulação(p = 0,004; r = -0,43).Conclusão: A realização desta prova foi útil para distinguir os doentes com HCSR-NC e PPI, pois nenhum valor de 17-OHP basal permitia fazer o diagnóstico diferencial definitivo. Em alguns doentes com HCSR-NCa prova revelou secreção inapropriada de cortisol em stress, contribuindo para a decisão terapêutica.