Será que a Definição de Síndroma Metabólica pela International Diabetes Federation Melhora a Capacidade Preditora para Doença Coronária e do Espessamento da Íntima-Média Carotídea?

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is associated with increased incidence of diabetes and atherosclerotic complications. The new definition of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) increases the population with this entity, compared to the NCEP ATP III definition. OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with and without MS, according to the NCEP ATP III and IDF definitions, and the predictive ability of carotid IMT for CAD. METHODS: We studied 270 consecutive patients admitted for elective coronary angiography due to suspicion of CAD. All patients underwent ultrasound study of the carotid arteries to measure IMT (the highest value between the right and left common carotid arteries was used in the analysis). Coronary stenosis of > or =70% (or 50% for the left main coronary artery) was considered significant. RESULTS: By the ATP III definition, 14% of the patients had MS, and these patients had a higher prevalence of CAD (87% vs. 63%, p = 0.004), but no significant difference was found for carotid IMT (1.03 +/- 0.36 mm vs. 0.95 +/- 0.35 mm, p=NS). With the IDF definition, 61% of the patients had MS; this group was slightly older and included more women. There were no differences in terms of CAD (68% vs. 63%) or carotid IMT (0.97 +/- 0.34 vs. 0.96 +/- 0.39 mm). On multivariate analysis, the ATP III definition of MS predicts CAD (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.71-13.25, p = 0.003), but the IDF definition does not (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.74-2.27, p = 0.37). On ROC curve analysis, an IMT of > or = 0.95 mm predicts CAD (AUC 0.66, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The new IDF definition increases the population with MS, decreasing the capacity to predict the presence of CAD. In our population, neither the ATP III nor the IDF definition showed differences in terms of carotid IMT. Carotid IMT can predict CAD, but with only modest sensitivity.

Gestão do Risco: Segurança do Doente em Ambiente Hospitalar

A Gestão do Risco e a Segurança do Doente nos hospitais portugueses, começou a dar os primeiros passos no final da década de 90, a partir de projetos voluntários de melhoria da qualidade em saúde, conduzidos pelo King’s Fund e Joint Commission International. Da experiência partilhada e aprendida podemos afirmar que a Gestão do Risco na Saúde é uma metodologia de excelência que contribui para aumentar a segurança de todos. As diferentes estruturas da organização devem manter uma estreita articulação neste processo e a equipa de gestão do risco deve articular com todos os serviços e diversas entidades da organização, designadamente Comissão da Qualidade, Controlo da Infeção Hospitalar, Saúde Ocupacional, Gabinete do Utente, Gabinete Contencioso, Instalações e Equipamentos, Hoteleiros entre outros. No que diz respeito às responsabilidades na gestão do risco, esta é de todos, pois todos os profissionais têm responsabilidades na prevenção de incidentes e na promoção da segurança. A Gestão do Risco assenta em quatro pilares essenciais que devem ser suportados por um programa de formação estruturado para todos os profissionais da organização. Da nossa experiência, estes pilares são a base para a operacionalização de um Programa de Gestão de Risco, sendo eles: - Sistema de Relato de Incidentes - Identificação e Avaliação do Risco - Monitorização de Indicadores de Segurança do Doente - Auditoria como Instrumento de Melhoria Continuia Neste artigo, iremos apenas aprofundar os dois primeiros pilares, baseando-nos na literatura internacional e na nossa experiência como enfermeiras no Centro Hospital de Lisboa Central.

Five-Year Review of an International Clinical Research-Training Program

The exponential increase in clinical research has profoundly changed medical sciences. Evidence that has accumulated in the past three decades from clinical trials has led to the proposal that clinical care should not be based solely on clinical expertise and patient values, and should integrate robust data from systematic research. As a consequence, clinical research has become more complex and methods have become more rigorous, and evidence is usually not easily translated into clinical practice. Therefore, the instruction of clinical research methods for scientists and clinicians must adapt to this new reality. To address this challenge, a global distance-learning clinical research-training program was developed, based on collaborative learning, the pedagogical goal of which was to develop critical thinking skills in clinical research. We describe and analyze the challenges and possible solutions of this course after 5 years of experience (2008-2012) with this program. Through evaluation by students and faculty, we identified and reviewed the following challenges of our program: 1) student engagement and motivation, 2) impact of heterogeneous audience on learning, 3) learning in large groups, 4) enhancing group learning, 5) enhancing social presence, 6) dropouts, 7) quality control, and 8) course management. We discuss these issues and potential alternatives with regard to our research and background.