3 resultados para Ingroup Bias
Resumo:
Objectivo: estudo comparativo simultâneo de medições invasivas utilizando o cateterismo da artéria pulmonar e não invasivas utilizando a ecocardiografia transtorácica (ETT) de 4 parâmetros hemodinâmicos: débito cardíaco (DC), pressão de encravamento da artéria pulmonar (PCP), pressão venosa central (PVC), e pressão sistólica da artéria pulmonar (PSAP). Material e Métodos: estudo prospectivo numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) médico-cirurgica. Foram estudados 41 doentes em pós-operatório de transplante hepático, nos quais o DC, a PCP, a PVC e a PSAP foram obtidos em simultâneo por 2 observadores independentes, utilizando a ETT e o cateterismo invasivo da artéria pulmonar. Para a quantificação por ETT dos parâmetros foram utilizadas fórmulas descritas na literatura. As medições invasivas e não invasivas foram comparadas através de uma análise de correlação linear e de Bland-Altman. Resultados: Verificou-se uma boa correlação nas medições invasivas e não invasivas do DC (r=0,97) e PVC (r=0,88). As correlações entre as medições invasivas e não invasivas da PCP e da PSAP foram fracas (r=0,41 e r= 0,118 respectivamente). O intervalo de confiança de 95% e bias para o DC foi negligenciável, em especial para valores de DC abaixo dos 6l/minuto. A ETT subestima em regra o DC, mas as duas técnicas mostraram uma correlação significativa entre si. Conclusões: a ETT pode estimar de forma fidedigna o DC em doentes submetidos a transplante hepático. A determinação não invasiva das restantes variáveis hemodinâmicas por ETT pode estar sujeita a uma variabilidade grande relacionada com as características dos doentes. Apesar dos dados terem sido obtidos num grupo específico de doentes, podem ajudar a definir uma aplicação futura da ecocardiografia em Cuidados Intensivos.
Resumo:
Little is known of cancer rehabilitation needs in Europe. EUROCHIP-3 organised a group of experts to propose a list of population-based indicators used for describing cancer rehabilitation across Europe. The aim of this study is to present and discuss these indicators. A EUROCHIP-3 expert panel reached agreement on two types of indicators. (a) Cancer prevalence indicators. These were proposed as a means of characterising the burden of cancer rehabilitation needs by time from diagnosis and patient health status. These indicators can be estimated from cancer registry data or by collecting data on follow-up and treatments for samples of cases archived in cancer registries. (b) Indicators of rehabilitation success. These include: return to work, quality of life, and satisfaction of specific rehabilitation needs. Studies can be performed to estimate these indicators in individual countries, but to obtain comparable data across European countries it will be necessary to administer a questionnaire to randomly selected samples of patients from population-based cancer registry databases. However, three factors complicate questionnaire studies: patients may not be aware that they have cancer; incomplete participation in surveys could lead to bias; and national confidentiality laws in some cases prohibit cancer registries from approaching patients. Although these studies are expensive and difficult to perform, but as the number of cancer survivors increases, it is important to document their needs in order to provide information on cancer control.
Resumo:
Background. HIV infected women have higher rates of infertility. Objective. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the effectiveness of fresh IVF/ICSI cycles in HIV infected women. Materials and Methods. A search of the PubMed database was performed to identify studies assessing fresh nondonor oocyte IVF/ICSI cycle outcomes of serodiscordant couples with an HIV infected female partner. Results and Discussion. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Whenever a comparison with a control group was available, with the exception of one case, ovarian stimulation cancelation rate was higher and pregnancy rate (PR) was lower in HIV infected women. However, statistically significant differences in both rates were only seen in one and two studies, respectively. A number of noncontrolled sources of bias for IVF outcome were identified. This fact, added to the small size of samples studied and heterogeneity in study design and methodology, still hampers the performance of a meta-analysis on the issue. Conclusion. Prospective matched case-control studies are necessary for the understanding of the specific effects of HIV infection on ovarian response and ART outcome.