4 resultados para Fear avoidance belief of pain
Resumo:
INTRODUCTION: Labour is considered to be one of the most painful and significant experiences in a woman's life. The aim of this study was to examine whether women's attachment style is a predictor of the pain experienced throughout labour and post-delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Thirty-two pregnant women were assessed during the third trimester of pregnancy and during labour. Adult attachment was assessed with the Adult Attachment Scale ' Revised. The perceived intensity of labour pain was measured using a visual analogue scale for pain in the early stage of labour, throughout labour and post-delivery. RESULTS:Women with an insecure attachment style reported more pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation (p < 0.05), before the administration of analgesia (p < 0.01) and post-delivery (p < 0.05) than those securely attached. In multivariate models, attachment style was a significant predictor of labour pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation and before the first administration of analgesia but not of the perceived pain post-delivery. DISCUSSION: These findings confirm that labour pain is influenced by relevant psychological factors and suggest that a woman's attachment style may be a risk factor for greater pain during labour. CONCLUSION:Future studies in the context of obstetric pain may consider the attachment style as an indicator of individual differences in the pain response during labour. This may have important implications in anaesthesiology and to promote a relevant shift in institutional practices and therapeutic procedures.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of post-caesarean analgesia comparing three techniques most frequently used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For three months all pregnant women submitted to elective or urgent caesarean section, under general or regional anaesthesia, were evaluate with a total of 129 parturient. These parturient were divided into three groups with different techniques of postoperative analgesia: Group 1 (n = 26) received intravenous pethidine and paracetamol per os, group 2 (n = 58) received epidural morphine and group 3 (n = 45) epidural morphine and intravenous propacetamol. Pain was assessed at rest and during mobilisation using a scale of 0-without pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain and 3-severe pain. Overall satisfaction was assessed with a verbal qualitative scale of very good, good, sufficient and bad. Side effects were analysed. RESULTS: The records of pain at rest and during mobilisation were significantly lower with epidural analgesia compared with intravenous pethidine. There were no significant differences between groups 2 and 3. Similar results were observed in the degree of satisfaction. For 50% of parturient of epidural analgesia (groups 2 and 3) and only 4% of intravenous pethidine (group 1) the analgesic technique was very good. Propacetamol and epidural morphine (group 3) had better pain scores (very good and good) when compared with morphine alone (group 2) but there were no significant differences. Epidural morphine was associated with more pruritus. CONCLUSION: From this study we are able to conclude that epidural morphine offers a good quality of analgesia with better satisfaction and minimal side effects.
Resumo:
Introdução: O cancro da próstata é uma importante causa de morbilidade e mortalidade. Em Portugal, de acordo com um estudo publicado em 2003, a taxa de novos casos de cancro na próstata era de 53 por 100.000 homens, em 2000, com uma taxa de mortalidade padronizada pela idade de 28 por 100.000 (em 1995). As metástases ósseas múltiplas são uma das principais complicações associadas ao cancro de próstata avançado. O Samário-EDTMP mostrou ser uma alternativa segura e eficaz no tratamento paliativo da dor associada a metástases ósseas. O objectivo deste estudo económico é avaliar o custo-efectividade do tratamento da dor associada a metástases ósseas múltiplas com Samário-153-EDTMP versus terapêutica convencional da dor, no carcinoma da próstata hormono-refractário, em Portugal. Metodologia: Estudo de custo-efectividade que compara os custos directos do tratamento de doentes com múltiplas metástases ósseas dolorosas com Samário-153-EDTMP versus terapêutica convencional para a dor, na perspectiva do Sistema Nacional de Saúde, em Portugal, num horizonte temporal de quatro meses. Resultados: Os custos directos totais num período de quatro meses são 2.311,91 € para um doente tratado com Samário-153-EDTMP versus 2.450,74 € para um doente sob tratamento padrão. De acordo com o modelo, um doente tratado com Samário-153-EDTMP representa um decréscimo de custos de 138,83 €. Conclusão: O Samário-153-EDTMP é não só um método terapêutico muito eficaz mas também uma solução com custos reduzidos quando comparado à terapêutica convencional da dor, em doentes com dor devida a metástases ósseas múltiplas, em Portugal.
Resumo:
Photodynamic therapy has been described as an effective therapeutic option in selected cases of anogenital lichen sclerosus that are refractory to first-line treatments. However, procedure-related pain is a limiting factor in patient adherence to treatment. The authors report the case of a 75-year-old woman with highly symptomatic vulvar lichen sclerosus, successfully treated with photodynamic therapy. An inhaled 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen premix was administered during sessions, producing a pain-relieving, anxiolytic, and sedative effect without loss of consciousness. This ready-to-use gas mixture may be a well-tolerated and accepted alternative to classical anesthetics in Photodynamic therapy, facilitating patients' adherence to illumination of pain-prone areas.