Psychosocial Morbidity and its Correlates in Cancer Patients of the Mediterranean Area: Findings from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study

BACKGROUND: A few and partial data are available on psychosocial morbidity among cancer patients in Mediterranean countries. As a part of a more general investigation (Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study-SEPOS), the rate of psychosocial morbidity and its correlation with clinical and cultural variables were examined in cancer patients in Italy, Portugal and Spain. METHODS: A convenience sample of cancer outpatients with good performance status and no cognitive impairment were approached. The Hospital Anxiety-Depression scale (HAD-S), the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale (Mini-MAC), and the Cancer Worries Inventory (CWI) were used to measure psychological morbidity, coping strategies and concerns about illness. RESULTS: Of 277 patients, 34% had pathological scores ("borderline cases" plus "true cases") on HAD-S Anxiety and 24.9% on HAD-S Depression. Total psychiatric "caseness" was 28.5% and 16.6%, according to different HAD cut-offs (14 and 19, respectively). Significant relationships of HAD-S Anxiety, HAD-S Depression, HAD-S Total score, with Mini-MAC Hopeless and Anxious Preoccupation, and CWI score were found. No differences emerged between countries on psychosocial morbidity, while some differences emerged between the countries on coping mechanisms. Furthermore, Fatalism, Avoidance and marginally Hopeless were higher compared to studies carried out in English-speaking countries. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small sample size and the good performance status prevent us to generalize data on patients with different cancer sites and advanced phase of illness. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the patients presented anxiety and depressive morbidity, with significant differences in characteristics of coping in Mediterranean countries in comparison with English-speaking countries.

Mental Health and Quality of Life in Alcoholic Liver Disease Patients After Liver Transplantation: a Prospective Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE: Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is one of the most important indications for liver transplantation. Discordant conclusions have been found concerning quality of life and mental health after transplantation in this particular group. The aim of this work was to investigate improvements in mental health and quality of life among transplanted patients for ALD. METHODS: We studied 45 consecutive transplant candidates with ALD, attending the outpatient clinics. Among these patients we transplanted 24 with the control candidates remaining in wait for transplantation. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in all mental health and quality of life dimensions among the transplanted ALD group. We also observed a favorable evolution of coping mechanisms (CM) in this group. CONCLUSION: There is a favorable adjustment of ALD patients after transplantation as shown in CM evolution, which might explain the improved mental health and quality-of-life dimensions.

Coping nos Doentes Transplantados

O desenvolvimento teórico dos Mecanismos de Coping (MC) tem como base uma dialéctica relacionada com os seus principais factores determinantes: individuais e situacionais (na base das duas abordagens do coping: disposicional e constitucional). Actualmente a classificação dos MC mais utilizada é baseada em duas dimensões: coping focado na emoção, e coping focado na resolução de problemas. Considera-se essencial que os métodos de classificação dos MC tenham em conta a coexistência de elementos disposicionais estáveis com uma variabilidade situacional dos MC. São abordados alguns instrumentos de medição de coping, baseados em diferentes pressupostos teóricos. O coping pode influenciar a saúde através de vários mecanismos (sistema neuroendócrino, comportamentos relacionados com os riscos para a saúde e adesão terapêutica) e é incluído em dois dos principais modelos teóricos de saúde (Moos & Schaefer e modelo de Leventhal). Com base numa revisão da literatura, concluiu-se que os estilos de coping mais prevalentes no pré transplante foram: aceitação, coping activo, e procura de suporte, sendo os menos utilizados: auto culpabilização e evitação. No pós transplante o coping activo e procura de suporte continuam a ser os estilos de coping preferenciais, a par da confrontação, autoconfiança, recurso à religião e coping focado no problema. Os estilos de coping (Evasivo, Emotivo, Fatalistico) estão associados a uma menor capacidade de controlo pessoal sobre a doença, a confrontação a uma maior qualidade de vida, o evitamento à redução da qualidade de vida e ao aumento dos níveis de depressão e a negação ao aumento da não adesão. A compreensibilidade, a sensação de controlo sobre a doença, os estilos de coping «relacionados com a expressão dos afectos» e a negação variam ao longo da evolução do doente transplantado.