C4d Presence in Kidney Allograft Biopsy: Sensitivity and Specifity of Immunoperoxidase vs Immunofluorescence

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the sensitivity/specificity of immunoperoxidase method in comparison with the standard immunofluorescence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 87 biopsies made for allograft dysfunction. Immunofluorescence (IF) was performed in frozen allograft biopsies using monoclonal antibody anti-C4d from Quidel®. The indirect immunoperoxidase (IP) technique was performed in paraffin-embebbed tissue with polyclonal antiserum from Serotec®. Biopsies were independently evaluated by two nephropathologist according Banff 2007 classification. RESULTS: By IF, peritubular C4d deposition were detected in 60 biopsies and absent in 27 biopsies. The evaluation of biopsy by IP was less precise due to the presence of background and unspecific staining. We find 13.8% (12/87) of false negative and Banff classification concordance in 79.3% (69/87) of cases (table1). The ROC curve study reveal a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 80.0 % of IP method in relation to the gold standard (area under curve:0.900; 95% Confidence interval :0.817-0.954; p=0.0001). Banff Classification C4d Cases Immunofluorescence Immunoperoxidase n =87 Diffuse Negative 3 (3.4%) Focal Negative 9 (10.3%) Negative Negative 27 (31.0%) Diffuse Diffuse 33 (37.9%) Focal Focal 9 (10.3%) Diffuse Focal 6 (6.9%) CONCLUSION: The IP method presents a good specificity, but lesser sensitivity to C4d detection in allograft dysfunction. The evaluation is more difficult, requiring more experience of the observer than IF method. If frozen tissue is unavailable, the use of IP for C4d detection is acceptable.

Factores Preditivos de Cicatriz Renal após Pielonefrite em Crianças com Menos de Dois Anos de Idade

Objectivos. Identificar factores laboratoriais e imagiológicos associados ao desenvolvimento de cicatriz renal sequelar após pielonefrite em doentes com menos de dois anos de idade e avaliar o papel da ecografia no estudo não invasivo de pielonefrite. Local. Hospital pediátrico universitário de nível III. População. Crianças com idade inferior a dois anos hospitalizadas com o diagnóstico de primeira pielonefrite. Métodos. Avaliação prospectiva do risco de cicatriz renal, através de parâmetros laboratoriais e imagiológicos. Estudo de efectividade da ecografia renal e vesical para identificar pielonefrite aguda e refluxo vesico-ureteral (RVU). Admite-se como método padrão para detecção de pielonefrite aguda e cicatriz renal a cintigrafia renal com DMSA e para detecção de RVU, a cisto-uretografia permiccional (CUM). Resultados. Estudaram-se 134 crianças, com mediana de idades de 3 meses (p25-p75: 1-9 meses) sendo 60% do sexo masculino. Acintigrafia em ambulatório evidenciou a presença de cicatriz renal em 42% das crianças. Valores de proteína C reactiva superiores a 5 mg/dl estiveram associados a alterações da cintigrafia em ambulatório [RR 2,7 (IC95% 1,1-7), VP+ 64,3%, VP– 76,5%]. A presença de RVU grau ≥ II esteve associada a cicatriz renal na cintigrafia em ambulatório [RR 2,6 (IC95% 1,7-4,2), VP+ 100%, VP–51,7%]. Vinte por cento das crianças tinha RVU verificado pela CUM, tendo a ecografia excluído de forma significativa a sua presença, em relação à CUM [LR+ 9,9 (1,4-69,3), VP– 94,4%]. Conclusões. No grupo estudado, o valor de proteína C reactiva e a presença de RVU grau ≥ II foram os principais factores preditivos de cicatriz renal. O papel da ecografia parece ser relevante no estudo de pielonefrite, sobretudo para excluir RVU.

Safety and Effectiveness of the Genous™ Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Capture Stent in the First Year Following ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Single Center Experience and Review of the Literature

PURPOSE: The Genous™ stent (GS) is designed to accelerate endothelization, which is potentially useful in the pro-thrombotic environment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the GS in the first year following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to compare our results with the few previously published studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients admitted to a single center due to STEMI that underwent primary PCI using exclusively GS, between May 2006 and January 2012, were enrolled. The primary study endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as the composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization, at one and 12months. RESULTS: In the cohort of 109 patients (73.4% male, 59 ±12years), 24.8% were diabetic. PCI was performed in 116 lesions with angiographic success in 99.1%, using 148 GS with median diameter of 3.00mm (2.50-4.00) and median length of 15mm (9-33). Cumulative MACEs were 2.8% at one month and 6.4% at 12months. Three stent thromboses (2.8%), all subacute, and one stent restenosis (0.9%) occurred. These accounted for the four target vessel revascularizations (3.7%). At 12months, 33.9% of patients were not on dual antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: GS was safe and effective in the first year following primary PCI in STEMI, with an apparently safer profile comparing with the previously published data. SUMMARY: We report the safety and effectiveness of the Genous™ stent (GS) in the first year following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. A comprehensive review of the few studies that have been published on this subject was included and some suggest a less safe profile of the GS. Our results and the critical review included may add information and reinforce the safety and effectiveness of the GS in ST-elevation in acute myocardial infarction.