Psychosocial Morbidity and its Correlates in Cancer Patients of the Mediterranean Area: Findings from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study

BACKGROUND: A few and partial data are available on psychosocial morbidity among cancer patients in Mediterranean countries. As a part of a more general investigation (Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study-SEPOS), the rate of psychosocial morbidity and its correlation with clinical and cultural variables were examined in cancer patients in Italy, Portugal and Spain. METHODS: A convenience sample of cancer outpatients with good performance status and no cognitive impairment were approached. The Hospital Anxiety-Depression scale (HAD-S), the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale (Mini-MAC), and the Cancer Worries Inventory (CWI) were used to measure psychological morbidity, coping strategies and concerns about illness. RESULTS: Of 277 patients, 34% had pathological scores ("borderline cases" plus "true cases") on HAD-S Anxiety and 24.9% on HAD-S Depression. Total psychiatric "caseness" was 28.5% and 16.6%, according to different HAD cut-offs (14 and 19, respectively). Significant relationships of HAD-S Anxiety, HAD-S Depression, HAD-S Total score, with Mini-MAC Hopeless and Anxious Preoccupation, and CWI score were found. No differences emerged between countries on psychosocial morbidity, while some differences emerged between the countries on coping mechanisms. Furthermore, Fatalism, Avoidance and marginally Hopeless were higher compared to studies carried out in English-speaking countries. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small sample size and the good performance status prevent us to generalize data on patients with different cancer sites and advanced phase of illness. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the patients presented anxiety and depressive morbidity, with significant differences in characteristics of coping in Mediterranean countries in comparison with English-speaking countries.

Why and How Was Regionalization of Perinatal Care Accomplished in Portugal?

Portuguese health care system was created in 1979. It is universal and for free. Expenses are supported by the State through taxes. The modern perinatal care system started by the end of 1970. The first neonatal intensive care units were created in 1980, the Portuguese Neonatal Society in 1985 and the National Neonatal Transport System in 1987. Until the seventies of twentieth century and even during eighties there were more than 200 hospitals with deliveries, a great part without obstetrician or paediatrician, a great percentage of pregnancies had no prenatal care, there were few neonatal intensive care units and perinatal mortality rate was one of the highest in the European countries. In 1987 an Experts Committee was nominated by the Health Ministry aiming to collect and analyse data on perinatal care and to suggest improvements. The Report resulting from this work is the main document on which is based the reform. The reform was a 9 years program in 3 years stages aiming to close hospitals with less than 1500 deliveries/year, to reclassify hospitals, to create Coordinating Units between health centres and hospitals, to equip neonatal intensive and intermediate care units, to define needs of obstetricians, paediatricians and nurses for each centre and to promote specialised training in neonatology for paediatricians and nurses. Levels of perinatal care were defined as well as localization of each level of hospital according to the number of deliveries in one geographic area, geographic difficulties and existing routes and connections. Steps for opening and closure of different levels of hospitals were very well programmed. The organization, capacities, number of obstetricians, neonatologists and nurses as well as equipment for each level of care was defined. Rules for pregnant women and newborns transfer from level II to level III hospitals were also well described. A specific training is neonatology was created starting in 1990. This organization resulted in an impressive decrease in mortality rates at all levels and still it is the policy we have today.

Eventos Adversos na Prestação de Cuidados Hospitalares em Portugal no Ano de 2008

Introdução: A criação pela Organização Mundial de Saúde da World Alliance for Patient Safety em 2004, é resultado da preocupação crescente face ao domínio da segurança do doente, sendo a ocorrência de erros reconhecida como um grande problema de saúde pública e uma ameaça à qualidade dos cuidados prestados. Objectivo, material e métodos: Tendo por base os códigos da Classificação Internacional de Doenças, 9.ª Revisão, Modificação Clínica (subclasses 996-999, E870-E876 e E878-879), esta investigação procurou conhecer a dimensão dos eventos adversos, decorrentes da prestação de cuidados de saúde nos hospitais públicos de Portugal Continental, relatados no sistema de classificação de doentes em Grupos de Diagnóstico Homogéneo, no ano de 2008. Resultados e discussão: Os resultados revelaram a ocorrência de eventos adversos em 2,5% dos episódios de internamento hospitalar, surgindo na sua maioria como diagnósticos secundários de internamento. A frequência de eventos adversos foi ligeiramente superior nos indivíduos do sexo masculino (2,6%) quando comparada com o sexo feminino (2,4%). A idade dos indivíduos com eventos adversos é em média cinco anos superior à dos restantes indivíduos. O tempo de internamento nos casos de eventos adversos foi em média 4,14 vezes superior quando comparado com o tempo médio de internamento dos restantes episódios. Foi possível também estimar que os custos associados a eventos adversos correspondam a cerca de 4.436€ por episódio de internamento, tendo como referência o custo unitário total por dia de hospitalização no Serviço Nacional de Saúde. A frequência de destino após alta para outra instituição com internamento foi 2,5 vezes superior nos casos de eventos adversos, enquanto o número de falecimentos foi 2,44 vezes superior, quando comparados com os restantes episódios de internamento. Verificou-se ainda que o destino após alta para o domicílio foi menos frequente nos episódios com eventos adversos. As diferenças de frequência de eventos adversos por região foram ligeiras, sendo superior na região centro (3,0%) e inferior na região do Alentejo (1,7%). Conclusão: Os dados sugerem que a ocorrência de eventos adversos possa estar associada a períodos de internamento mais prolongados, maiores custos e maior mortalidade. A frequência de eventos adversos foi maior em indivíduos mais velhos e a diferença entre sexo ou região hospitalar não se mostrou substancial. Neste sentido, é urgente conhecer o real impacto dos eventos adversos, nomeadamente em indicadores como morbilidade e mortalidade dos portugueses.