Misoprostol na Indução do Trabalho de Parto: Oral ou Vaginal?

Algumas complicações maternas ou fetais no decorrer da gravidez tornam necessária a indução do trabalho de parto. O misoprostol é um análogo sintético da prostaglandina Eı que mimetiza a acção endógena destas substâncias na maturação do colo do útero. A dose ideal, via e frequência de administração continuam sob investigação. O objectivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficácia do misoprostol na indução do trabalho de parto e a morbilidade associada à sua administração oral e vaginal. Foi efectuada uma avaliação retrospectiva das grávidas internadas para indução do trabalho de parto durante o ano de 2002, no serviço de Medicina Materno Fetal da Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa. Foram seleccionadas as grávidas que efectuaram misoprostol oral (100 mg) e vaginal (50 mg). Foi avaliado o intervalo de tempo até à fase activa, ao parto, a necessidade de perfusão com occitocina, a via de parto e a morbilidade materna e fetal. Consideraram-se 238 grávidas, 194 efectuaram misoprostol oral e 44 vaginal. O intervalo da indução ao parto vaginal foi 24,3 horas na via oral e 16,9 horas na via vaginal (p=0.01), a dose total administrada foi significativamente inferior na via vaginal (p=0.00), a paridade foi um factor importante na via de parto (p=0.01). Não se verificaram diferenças entre os dois grupos em relação às complicações maternas e fetais. A administração vaginal de misoprostol, quando comparada com a oral, mostrou-se mais eficaz.

Embolisation of Prostatic Arteries as Treatment of Moderate to Severe Lower Urinary Symptoms (LUTS) Secondary to Benign Hyperplasia: Results of Short- and Mid-Term Follow-Up

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short- and medium-term results of prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: This was a prospective non-randomised study including 255 patients diagnosed with BPH and moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms after failure of medical treatment for at least 6 months. The patients underwent PAE between March 2009 and April 2012. Technical success is when selective prostatic arterial embolisation is completed in at least one pelvic side. Clinical success was defined as improving symptoms and quality of life. Evaluation was performed before PAE and at 1, 3, 6 and every 6 months thereafter with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), uroflowmetry, prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and volume. Non-spherical polyvinyl alcohol particles were used. RESULTS: PAE was technically successful in 250 patients (97.9 %). Mean follow-up, in 238 patients, was 10 months (range 1-36). Cumulative rates of clinical success were 81.9 %, 80.7 %, 77.9 %, 75.2 %, 72.0 %, 72.0 %, 72.0 % and 72.0 % at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months, respectively. There was one major complication. CONCLUSIONS: PAE is a procedure with good results for BPH patients with moderate to severe LUTS after failure of medical therapy. KEY POINTS: • Prostatic artery embolisation offers minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. • Prostatic artery embolisation is a challenging procedure because of vascular anatomical variations. • PAE is a promising new technique that has shown good results.

Teste Rápido VIH e Gravidez

Este estudo pretendeu avaliar o benefício do Teste Rápido VIH na prevenção da transmissão perinatal. Realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo, em que se avaliaram 238 pedidos de Teste Rápido VIH entre 2001 e 2005. Realçaram-se dados relativamente ao pedido de teste, o seu resultado, assim como as medidas profilácticas adoptadas e sua eficácia. Os pedidos incidiram predominantemente em grávidas em trabalho de parto (93,2%), a maioria por gravidez não vigiada. O Teste Rápido VIH foi positivo em 13 casos (5%), 11 com diagnóstico intra-parto. Detectou-se um falso positivo. Dos 10 casos com diagnóstico intra-parto, realizou-se quimio-profilaxia num caso, inibiu-se a amamentação em nove, e iniciou-se profilaxia neonatal em 9 casos. Não ocorreu nenhum caso de infecção perinatal. O Teste Rápido VIH é um teste fácil, rápido, flexível, com alta sensibilidade e especificidade. Permite um diagnóstico mais rápido que o teste ELISA, possibilitando administração de profilaxia intra-parto e neonatal, que comprovadamente reduz a transmissão vertical de VIH.

Meningite Assética Associada à Terapêutica com Imunoglobulina Endovenosa

Aseptic meningitis can be an adverse drug reaction to intravenous immunoglobulin. We describe a previously healthy 4-yearold boy, admitted for idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura. He received two infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin. Four hours after the last administration the patient developed a meningeal syndrome. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid revealed 500 cells/μl (predominantly neutrophils) and normal biochemistry. Bacteriological and virological tests were negative. After 48h he was asymptomatic. Given the absence of other aetiological factors and the temporal relationship between the administration of immunoglobulin and the development of symptoms, we believe the patient had an aseptic meningitis related to intravenous immunoglobulin. This therapy may cause headache, fever and vomiting; however, lumbar puncture is not usually performed, so this complication may be underdiagnosed.

Variation in Haemodynamic Monitoring for Major Surgery in European Nations: Secondary Analysis of the EuSOS Dataset

BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac output monitoring may improve patient outcomes after major surgery. However, little is known about the use of this technology across nations. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a previously published observational study. Patients aged 16 years and over undergoing major non-cardiac surgery in a 7-day period in April 2011 were included into this analysis. The objective is to describe prevalence and type of cardiac output monitoring used in major surgery in Europe. RESULTS: Included in the analysis were 12,170 patients from the surgical services of 426 hospitals in 28 European nations. One thousand four hundred and sixteen patients (11.6 %) were exposed to cardiac output monitoring, and 2343 patients (19.3 %) received a central venous catheter. Patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were more frequently exposed to cardiac output monitoring (ASA I and II, 643 patients [8.6 %]; ASA III-V, 768 patients [16.2 %]; p < 0.01) and central venous catheter (ASA I and II, 874 patients [11.8 %]; ASA III-V, 1463 patients [30.9 %]; p < 0.01). In elective surgery, 990 patients (10.8 %) were exposed to cardiac output monitoring, in urgent surgery 252 patients (11.7 %) and in emergency surgery 173 patients (19.8 %). A central venous catheter was used in 1514 patients (16.6 %) undergoing elective, in 480 patients (22.2 %) undergoing urgent and in 349 patients (39.9 %) undergoing emergency surgery. Nine hundred sixty patients (7.9 %) were monitored using arterial waveform analysis, 238 patients (2.0 %) using oesophageal Doppler ultrasound, 55 patients (0.5 %) using a pulmonary artery catheter and 44 patients (2.0 %) using other technologies. Across nations, cardiac output monitoring use varied from 0.0 % (0/249 patients) to 27.5 % (19/69 patients), whilst central venous catheter use varied from 5.6 % (7/125 patients) to 43.2 % (16/37 patients). CONCLUSIONS: One in ten patients undergoing major surgery is exposed to cardiac output monitoring whilst one in five receives a central venous catheter. The use of both technologies varies widely across Europe.