A Case of Late-Diagnosed Ovotesticular Disorder of Sex Development

We report acase of!ovotesticular disorder of sex development!(DSD) with ambiguous genitalia, 46XX presenting the clinical, laboratory, imaging and operative findings and highlighting the pertinent features of this case. Results of hormonal, genetic testing and histopathology findings are reviewed. Diagnosis of true hermaphroditism is well defined and the condition can be recognized even prenatally. Conservative gonadal surgery is the procedure of choice after the diagnosis of true hermaphroditism, if the risk of a gonadal malignancy is low. Continued follow-up is necessary because of the multiple psychological, gynecological and urological problems encountered postpubertally by these patients.

Importância da Prova de Synacthen no Diagnóstico Diferencial de Pubarca Precoce

Introdução: Nos doentes com pubarca precoce, o gold-standard para o diagnóstico diferencial entre pubarca precoce idiopática (PPI) e a forma não clássica da hiperplasia congénita da suprarrenal (HCSR--NC) é a prova de Synacthen. Esta permite também estimar a reserva adrenal de cortisol nos doentes com HCSR-NC.Objetivos: Comparar as características clínicas e perfil hormonal basal dos doentes com pubarca pre-coce; avaliar a importância da prova de Synacthen no diagnóstico diferencial entre PPI e HCSR-NC e na determinação da reserva adrenal de cortisol. Material e métodos: Estudo transversal de doentes com pubarca precoce que realizaram prova de Synacthen. Resultados: Foram incluídos 43 doentes, com idade mediana de 7,5 anos (3,5-9,4), sendo 37 (86,0%) do sexo feminino. Na prova de Synacthen, 37 (86,0%) foram classificados como PPI e 6 (14,0%) como HCSR-NC.Não houve diferencças significativas entre os 2 grupos quanto às características clínicas e doseamentos basais de ACTH, cortisol e androgénios da suprarrenal. A 17-OHP basal e estimulada foi mais elevada nos doentes com HCSR-NC (p = 0,001 e p < 0,001, respetivamente) (basal: 4,62 ± 3,70 ng/ml [0,80-10,50];estimulada: 35,41 ± 24,87 ng/ml [12,0-80,2]) do que nos doentes com PPI (basal: 1,04 ± 0,77 ng/ml [0,22-3,80]; estimulada: 4,18 ± 1,71 ng/ml [1,0-8,96]). O cut-off basal habitualmente proposto (< 2,0 ng/ml) paraa distinção entre estes grupos não o permitiu em 2 doentes, que apenas foram diagnosticados após realização da prova de Synacthen. Dois doentes com HCSR-NC (33,3%) tiveram cortisol após estimulação< 18 g/dl, revelando necessidade de tratamento com glucocorticoide em stress. Os doentes com HCSR--NC com valores mais elevados de 17-OHP basal tiveram valores de cortisol mais baixos após estimulação(p = 0,004; r = -0,43).Conclusão: A realização desta prova foi útil para distinguir os doentes com HCSR-NC e PPI, pois nenhum valor de 17-OHP basal permitia fazer o diagnóstico diferencial definitivo. Em alguns doentes com HCSR-NCa prova revelou secreção inapropriada de cortisol em stress, contribuindo para a decisão terapêutica.

PROP1 Gene Analysis in Portuguese Patients with Combined Pituitary Hormone Deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Mutations of the PROP1 gene lead to combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD), which is characterized by a deficiency of GH, TSH, LH/FSH, PRL and, less frequently, ACTH. This study was undertaken to investigate the molecular defect in a cohort of patients with CPHD. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: A multicentric study involving 46 cases of CPHD (17 familial cases belonging to seven kindreds and 29 sporadic cases) selected on the basis of clinical and hormonal evidence of GH deficiency, central hypothyroidism and hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, in the absence of an identified cause of hypopituitarism. Mutations of PROP1 were investigated by DNA sequencing. Clinical, hormonal and neuroradiological data were collected at each centre. RESULTS: PROP1 mutations were identified in all familial cases: five kindreds presented a c. 301-302delAG mutation, one kindred presented a c. 358C --> T (R120C) mutation and one presented a previously unreported initiation codon mutation, c. 2T --> C. Of the 29 sporadic cases, only two (6.9%) presented PROP1 germline mutations (c. 301-302delAG, in both). Phenotypic variability was observed among patients with the same mutations, particularly the presence and age of onset of hypocortisolism, the levels of PRL and the results of pituitary imaging. One patient presented a sellar mass that persisted into adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a mutation in the initiation codon of the PROP1 gene and this further expands the spectrum of known mutations responsible for CPHD. The low mutation frequency observed in sporadic cases may be due to the involvement of other unidentified acquired or genetic causes.