1 resultado para Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877)
em RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (41)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (40)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (49)
- Boston University Digital Common (5)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (5)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (11)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (22)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (4)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Harvard University (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (59)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (23)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (11)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (21)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Michigan (558)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Washington (4)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
This article aims to reconstruct the critical debate regarding the examination of the crisis in the disciplines of art history and criticism with a particular focus on the proposal formulated by U.S. theorists who contributed to October journal. The discrediting of many modernist critical methods, particularly that of Clement Greenberg – the formalist diktat – marked the birth of the journal and gave rise to proposals set forth by critics committed to a new approach. Their divergent positions, nonetheless, have contributed to undermining the traditional concepts of the autonomy of art and criticism. The proposals discussed over the course of publication were the result of a reappraisal of the disciplinary instruments of art history and criticism pursuant to the crucial cultural changes which took place in the 1980s.