Tempos de espera cirúrgicos: situação em Portugal e determinantes

RESUMO - Objectivos Um dos problemas mais comuns nos sistemas de saúde e particularmente naqueles que têm uma estrutura predominantemente pública são os elevados Tempos Espera (TE) para cirurgia. Este projecto tem como principal objectivo identificar a importância relativa em Portugal das determinantes do TE cirúrgico. Metodologia Para clarificar essa importância, aplicou-se um questionário desenvolvido pelo Fraser Institute, utilizado para a análise anual dos TE no Canadá, recorrendo a um painel de peritos e através da realização da técnica Delphi, procurou-se consensualizar quais as determinantes das Listas Espera (LE), mais importantes. Para ilustrar a diversidade de perspectivas, recorreu-se também à análise de trabalhos realizados por inúmeras organizações, onde pudemos observar e recolher distintas abordagens, políticas e técnicas da questão das LE em países com diferentes tipos de sistemas de saúde. Resultados Os resultados obtidos revelam que os peritos consideraram a disponibilidade de tempo no Bloco Operatório (BO) e a de anestesiologistas, como as determinantes com maior impacto no aumento das LE. Conclusões Dos dados recebidos relativos ao Sistema Integrado Gestão Inscritos Cirurgia (SIGIC), bem como dos retirados de relatórios oficiais, concluímos que as LE cirúrgicas tiveram evolução positiva, nomeadamente na redução da mediana do TE da Lista Inscritos Cirurgia (LIC) (meses), no entanto, os objectivos dos Tempos Máximos Resposta Garantidos (TMRG) não estão a ser cumpridos. A análise das diferentes iniciativas e estratégias políticas para combater as LE, permitiu-nos sugerir caminhos a explorar, tendo como objectivo minorar o problema das LE: cuidados integrados, optimização da eficiência na utilização da capacidade instalada e maior aposta na cirurgia de ambulatório.

What hides behind the fixed-term contracts wage gap?

In Portugal, about 20% of full-time workers are employed under a fixed-term contract. Using a rich longitudinal matched employer-employee dataset for Portugal, with more than 20 million observations and covering the 2002-2012 period, we confirm the common idea that fixed-term contracts are not desirable when compared to permanent ones, by estimating a conditional wage gap of -1.7 log points. Then, we evaluate the sources of that wage penalty by combining a three way high-dimensional fixed effects model with the decomposition of Gelbach (2014), in which the three dimensions considered are the worker’s unobserved ability, the firm’s compensation wage policy and the job title effect. It is shown that the average worker with a fixed-term contract is less productive than his/her permanent counterparts, explaining -3.92 log points of the FTC wage penalty. Additionally, the sorting of workers into lower-paid job titles is also responsible for -0.59 log points of the wage gap. Surprisingly, we found that the allocation of workers among firms mitigates the existing wage penalty (in 4.23 log points), as fixed-term workers are concentrated into firms with a more generous compensation policy. Finally, following Figueiredo et al. (2014), we further control for the worker-firm match characteristics and reach the conclusion that fixed-term employment relationships have an overrepresentation of low quality worker-firm matches, explaining 0.65 log points of the FTC wage penalty.

Wage adjustments under extreme downward nominal wage rigidity

Using a rich and highly accurate dataset for Portugal spanning from 1986 to 2013, this paper analyzes the determinants of downward nominal wage rigidity, mainly focusing on macroeconomic factors. The data supports the hypothesis that recessionary periods alongside with low in ation contribute to a higher degree of wage rigidity, as measured by the incidence of nominal wage freezes. It is further highlighted how this lack of wage adjustments con- tributed to an increase in labor costs which culminated in a wage markup of 6-7%. This paper, thus seems to corroborate the argument that low in ation did exacerbated the downward in exibility of (real) wages after the Great Recession.

Graph usage in annual reports, evidence from Norwegian listed companies

As investors and other users of annual reports often focus their attention on graphs, it is important that they portray accurate and reliable information. However, previous studies show that graphs often distort information and mislead users. This study analyses graph usage in annual reports from the 52 most traded Norwegian companies. The findings suggest that Norwegian companies commonly use graphs, and that the graph distortions, presentational enhancement and measurement distortion, are present. No evidence of selectivity was found. This study recommends development of guidelines for graphical disclosure, and advises preparers and users of annual reports to be aware of misleading graphs.