Reactive hybrid knowledge bases

Hybrid knowledge bases are knowledge bases that combine ontologies with non-monotonic rules, allowing to join the best of both open world ontologies and close world rules. Ontologies shape a good mechanism to share knowledge on theWeb that can be understood by both humans and machines, on the other hand rules can be used, e.g., to encode legal laws or to do a mapping between sources of information. Taking into account the dynamics present today on the Web, it is important for these hybrid knowledge bases to capture all these dynamics and thus adapt themselves. To achieve that, it is necessary to create mechanisms capable of monitoring the information flow present on theWeb. Up to today, there are no such mechanisms that allow for monitoring events and performing modifications of hybrid knowledge bases autonomously. The goal of this thesis is then to create a system that combine these hybrid knowledge bases with reactive rules, aiming to monitor events and perform actions over a knowledge base. To achieve this goal, a reactive system for the SemanticWeb is be developed in a logic-programming based approach accompanied with a language for heterogeneous rule base evolution having as its basis RIF Production Rule Dialect, which is a standard for exchanging rules over theWeb.

Bits, Atoms, and Information Sharing: new opportunities for participation

The particular characteristics and affordances of technologies play a significant role in human experience by defining the realm of possibilities available to individuals and societies. Some technological configurations, such as the Internet, facilitate peer-to-peer communication and participatory behaviors. Others, like television broadcasting, tend to encourage centralization of creative processes and unidirectional communication. In other instances still, the affordances of technologies can be further constrained by social practices. That is the case, for example, of radio which, although technically allowing peer-to-peer communication, has effectively been converted into a broadcast medium through the legislation of the airwaves. How technologies acquire particular properties, meanings and uses, and who is involved in those decisions are the broader questions explored here. Although a long line of thought maintains that technologies evolve according to the logic of scientific rationality, recent studies demonstrated that technologies are, in fact, primarily shaped by social forces in specific historical contexts. In this view, adopted here, there is no one best way to design a technological artifact or system; the selection between alternative designs—which determine the affordances of each technology—is made by social actors according to their particular values, assumptions and goals. Thus, the arrangement of technical elements in any technological artifact is configured to conform to the views and interests of those involved in its development. Understanding how technologies assume particular shapes, who is involved in these decisions and how, in turn, they propitiate particular behaviors and modes of organization but not others, requires understanding the contexts in which they are developed. It is argued here that, throughout the last century, two distinct approaches to the development and dissemination of technologies have coexisted. In each of these models, based on fundamentally different ethoi, technologies are developed through different processes and by different participants—and therefore tend to assume different shapes and offer different possibilities. In the first of these approaches, the dominant model in Western societies, technologies are typically developed by firms, manufactured in large factories, and subsequently disseminated to the rest of the population for consumption. In this centralized model, the role of users is limited to selecting from the alternatives presented by professional producers. Thus, according to this approach, the technologies that are now so deeply woven into human experience, are primarily shaped by a relatively small number of producers. In recent years, however, a group of three interconnected interest groups—the makers, hackerspaces, and open source hardware communities—have increasingly challenged this dominant model by enacting an alternative approach in which technologies are both individually transformed and collectively shaped. Through a in-depth analysis of these phenomena, their practices and ethos, it is argued here that the distributed approach practiced by these communities offers a practical path towards a democratization of the technosphere by: 1) demystifying technologies, 2) providing the public with the tools and knowledge necessary to understand and shape technologies, and 3) encouraging citizen participation in the development of technologies.

Avaliação da sustentabilidade corporativa: estudo das relações híbridas pelo modelo do Hybrid Bottom Line

A presente tese reflete sobre os temas do desenvolvimento sustentável, da sustentabilidade corporativa, da responsabilidade social corporativa e das dimensões do Triple Bottom Line. O principal objetivo do nosso trabalho é contribuir para o conhecimento das relações que se estabelecem nas interseções entre a dimensão económica, social e ambiental da sustentabilidade corporativa, aqui designadas de relações híbridas. Neste sentido, desenvolveu-se um enquadramento teórico que fundamenta o modelo proposto, designado por Hybrid Bottom Line. De acordo com este enquadramento procurou-se conceber uma metodologia que permitisse analisar como é que estas relações de interseção entre economia-ambiente e economia-social se verificam e de que forma os seus resultados podem beneficiar a compreensão, avaliação e melhorias no entendimento da sustentabilidade corporativa, bem como possibilitar uma análise dirigida a fatores recombinantes específicos. Em complemento, foi desenvolvida uma proposta que permite posicionar o esforço desenvolvido pela empresa no âmbito da sustentabilidade e desta forma tipificar as suas ações. Nesta tese a abordagem empírica recaiu na análise dos relatórios de sustentabilidade publicados pelas empresas e baseados nas diretivas de relato propostas pelo Global Reporting Initiative. A amostra para o estudo abrangeu um total de 85 empresas de diferentes dimensões de 36 sectores económicos e representando 36 países de 5 continentes. A análise dos resultados foi feita utilizando diversos métodos de análise de dados (de frequência e de conteúdo) e análises estatísticas (análise de contingência, variância e de correspondências múltiplas) que permitiram observar as relações entre as dimensões do Triple Bottom Line, dando lugar à construção de uma matriz de relações híbridas. Seguidamente foi realizada uma análise longitudinal de uma das empresas da amostra tendo como referência a matriz híbrida obtida, assim como a tipificação da empresa no âmbito da sustentabilidade. Os resultados alcançados nas diferentes fases indicam que o enquadramento teórico que foi utilizado é útil para a análise das interseções entre as dimensões e permite uma avaliação dirigida a fatos ocorridos entre pares dimensionais, bem como projetar análises e posicionamentos futuros. Os resultados obtidos sugerem que a proposta apresentada é útil e deverá ser utilizada e desenvolvida noutros contextos. Esta tese contribui para a ideia de que a responsabilidade corporativa não deve ser só vista e operacionalizada como uma realidade de dimensões segmentadas mas também deve ser observada como um conjunto possível de interações que se manifestam nas interseções das suas diferentes dimensões.

Hybrid investment strategy active portfolio management – US stock market

This thesis aims to develop an alternative active managed portfolio strategy based on companies‟ Fundamental and Technical Analysis and analyze its finals results. There is a big distinction between the two approaches and the main objective is to understand if it is possible to take advantage of both. With this in mind a Hybrid investment strategy for the US stock market, due to its dimension and liquidity, which was able to outperform the S&P 500 index, the benchmark, during both Bear and Bull Markets between 2000 and 2015.

Does companionate love express itself unequally in different organizational forms (private companies, hybrid and non-governmental organizations)?

Although, the word “Love” in organizations is seen as a rare concept, but it has gained importance in management theoretical foundation. This study seeks to explore the companionate love in distinct of organizational forms (Private companies; Social organizations; NGO and IPSS) through interviews. The results propose that it is a tensional concept with a complex dynamic: tension of personal behavior, tension of professional behavior; tension of individual impact and tension of community impact. The love dynamic has common points to all organizations, but its expression depends on the specific form of the organization.