38 resultados para Biased Innovations
Resumo:
Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geospatial Technologies.
Resumo:
Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Doutor em Ambiente, pela Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia
Resumo:
Dissertation presented to obtain the PhD degree in Biology
Resumo:
Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia e Gestão Industrial
Resumo:
Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Estatística e Gestão de Informação
Resumo:
RESUMO:Os recentes progressos na imagiologia médica possibilitaram um papel de destaque para a Tomografia Axial Computorizada Multicorte no estadiamento do carcinoma do estômago (GA). Foi objetivo deste estudo avaliar a acuidade desta técnica no estadiamento T (invasão mural) e N (ganglionar) e avaliar fatores de prognóstico como fatores de representação/substituição para melhorar a referida acuidade. Sessenta e nove pacientes operados a carcinoma gástrico (GA) entre Janeiro de 2010 e Julho de 2012 e avaliados por Tomografia Computorizada, a maioria recorrendo a técnica de multicorte com distensão gástrica, foram estadiados retrospetivamente por três imagiologistas. Utilizaram-se critérios de avaliação referidos na literatura especializada e fatores de substituição/representação nos estadios menos eficazes. O estadiamento T revelou acuidade de 66,7% e sensibilidade de 92% e a acuidade, sensibilidade e especificidade obtidas para o estadiamento N foram respetivamente 49%, 40,9% e 64%. Usando um fator de substituição de estadiamento diagnóstico T4/N2 para mudar o estadiamento N2 obtido por MDCT para estadiamento N3A aumentaria a acuidade do estadiamento N para 59% e a sensibilidade para 58,1% e baixaria a especificidade para 61,5%, embora essa mudança não fosse estatisticamente significativa (Teste exato de Fisher 0,159). Em conclusão a acuidade de uma técnica simples de MDCT com distensão gástrica no estadiamento T e N do GA está dentro dos valores citados na literatura e fatores de substituição/representação como o estadiamento T4 e o tipo Difuso da classificação de Lauren podem melhorar a acuidade do estadiamento N.-------------- ABSTRACT: Recent innovations in medical sectional imaging have allowed a major role of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in staging of gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this technique in depth of mural invasion (T) and nodal (N) staging of GA and to evaluate prognostic factors as surrogate factors to improve such accuracy. Sixty nine patients operated to GA between January 2010 and July 2012 that underwent Computed Tomography, the majority through Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) with gastric distention, were staged retrospectively by three imagiologists with state-of-the-art criteria and surrogate prognostic factors were analyzed for less accurate stages. MDCT T-staging was 66,7 % accurate with a sensibility of 92 % and there was a 49 % accuracy, 40,9 % sensibility and 64 % specificity for N Staging. Using a surrogate factor of T4/N2 diagnostic staging to change diagnostic MDCT N2 disease to N3A disease would increase accuracy of N staging to 59% and sensibility to 58,1% and would decrease specificity to 61,5 %, although that change was not statistically significant (Fisher´s Exact Test 0,159)In conclusion the accuracy of a simple hydro-MDCT technique in T and N staging of GA is in the range of values cited in the literature and surrogate factors as diagnostic T4 disease and diffuse type of Lauren´s Classification may improve the accuracy of N staging.
Resumo:
A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Economics from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics
Resumo:
A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Management from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics
Resumo:
Innovations in Structural Engineering and Construction - ISEC, 2008
Resumo:
We would like to thank Philipp Schwarz and Julia Gückel for their dedicated support in preparing this paper and our colleagues and students of the School of Engineering and the Business School for our fruitful discussions.
Resumo:
The use of leaves for drinking water is a widespread tool-use behavior among chimpanzees. Although this tool-use behavior is widely described as the use of leaf sponges, it can actually be found in three different forms: leaf sponges, leaf-folding, and leaf spoons. Among the chimpanzee community of Bossou, we can observe all three forms, albeit in different frequencies. Here I describe the longitudinal record of manufacture and use of leaf tools for drinking water, highlighting the learning process underlying the acquisition of the skill. The degree of laterality evident in both immature and mature performers is also presented here. The use of leaves for drinking water emerges at the age of 1.5 years old, but the manufacture of leaf tools only starts at 3.5 years of age. Infants and juveniles were observed to use drinking tools that had been discarded by other individuals after use. Concerning handedness in general, the chimpanzees are ambidextrous, with some individuals biased to one side.
Resumo:
We study a two sector endogenous growth model with environmental quality with two goods and two factors of production, one clean and one dirty. Technological change creates clean or dirty innovations. We compare the laissez-faire equilibrium and the social optimum and study first- and second-best policies. Optimal policy encourages research toward clean technologies. In a second-best world, we claim that a portfolio that includes a tax on the polluting good combined with optimal innovation subsidy policies is less costly than increasing the price of the polluting good alone. Moreover, a discriminating innovation subsidy policy is preferable to a non-discriminating one.
Resumo:
A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Management from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics
Resumo:
This paper uses a field experiment to investigate the quality of individuals’ forecasts of relative performance in tournaments. We ask players in luck-based (poker) and skill-based (chess) tournaments to make point forecasts of rank. The main finding of the paper is that players’ forecasts in both types of tournaments are biased towards overestimation of relative performance. However, the size of the biases found is not as large as the ones often reported in the psychology literature. We also find support for the “unskilled and unaware hypothesis” in chess: high skilled chess players make better forecasts than low skilled chess players. Finally, we find that chess players’ forecasts of relative performance are not efficient.