A metafunção interpessoal em duas propagandas turísticas institucionais

A oração é também organizada como um evento interativo que envolve o falante, ou o autor, e o público (Halliday, 1994). No ato da fala, o falante adota para si mesmo um papel particular em relação à mesma e, ao fazer isso, ele designa ao ouvinte um papel complementar, papel esse que o falante espera que o ouvinte adote em seu turno (Halliday, 1994). A título de exemplificação, quando o falante faz uma pergunta, ele desempenha o papel daquele que procura uma informação e, deste modo, requer ao ouvinte que este último supra a informação pedida (Halliday, 1994). Este artigo apresenta uma análise de duas propagandas turísticas institucionais, uma da Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte, capital do Estado de Minas Gerais e a outra do Governo do Estado de Minas Gerais, sendo que tal capital e tal Estado estão localizados no Brasil. Tal análise valeu-se da metafunção interpessoal, a qual oferece um instrumental para a descrição da interação entre usuários da linguagem, seja tal interação pautada pelo fornecimento e/ou solicitação de informações e/ou de bens e serviços (Halliday, 1994; Halliday e Matthiessen, 2004). Quanto à metodologia, foram classificados os absolutos, as proposições, as propostas , os adjuntos modais e os itens lexicais, posteriormente quantificados com vistas a uma análise qualitativo-discursiva. Cabe salientar que a classificação da interpessoalidade em itens lexicais obedeceu a dois parâmetros propostos por Hunston e Thompson (2003), o de julgamento de valor e o de importância. Quando houve sobreposição destes dois parâmetros na classificação da interpessoalidade em itens lexicais, adotou -se um rótulo “ambos parâmetros” para abarcar tais casos. Resultados apontam uma maior recorrência de propostas na propaganda do Governo em comparação a da Prefeitura. Pode-se concluir que a propaganda da Prefeitura faz uso do gênero do discurso turístico com fins sócio - políticos, ao passo que a propaganda do Governo tem como objetivo divulgar o turismo em Minas Gerais sem tencionar diretamente persuadir seus leitores a partir do discurso político.

The False cognates in enology and gastronomy: a study in english and spanish

This paper will focus on some aspects of translation based on blending distinct linguistic domains such as the vocabulary of Hotel Industry, of Enology and Gastronomy in Spanish by tertiary level students (2nd year) of the course of Hotel Management. Portuguese students, most of the times, rely on a L1 (Portuguese) general language, namely using false cognates in the above mentioned areas in the Spanish and English classes in, at a first sight helpful but misleading way, hoping to succeed by using the word that seems correct to the context, when there isn’t, because: •they choose a word suitable to the context in L2, but the choice of that word is often misleading, by relying in a false L1 reality that is going to adulterate reality in the L2 domain, •but it seems that the opposite is also true, and takes place too; The difficulty in making such type of distinctions is due to: •the lack of linguistic and lexical knowledge; • the need to study the cause of these chromaticisms, by: • being in touch with specific literature; . working, not only with their peers, but also with their language teacher to develop strategies to diminish and, if possible, to eradicate this type of linguistic and, mainly translation problem, that causes so many learning constraints.

Some translation difficulties in the use of false friends in english

This paper will focus on some aspects of translation based on blending distinct linguistic domains such as English Language and Portuguese in using false friends in the English class in tertiary level students, reflecting namely on: 1. the choice of a word suitable to the context in L2 ; 2. the difficulties encountered by choice of that word that could be misleading, by relying in a false L1 reality that is going to adulterate reality in the L2 domain; 3. the difficulty in making such type of distinctions due to the lack of linguistic and lexical knowledge. 4. the need to study the cause of these difficulties by working, not only with their peers, but also with their language teacher to develop strategies to diminish and if possible to eradicate this type of linguistic and, above all, translation problem by making an inventory of those types of mistakes. In relation to the first point it is necessary to know that translation tasks involve much more than literal concepts ( Ladmiral, 1975) : furthermore it is necessary and suitable to realise that lexicon relies in significant contexts (Coseriu 1966), which connects both domains, that, at first sight do not seem to be compatible. In other words, although students have the impression they dominate lexicon due to the fact that they possess at least seven years of foreign language exposure that doesn’t mean they master the particularities engaged in such a delicate task as translation is concerned. There are some chromaticisms in the words (false friends), that need to be researched and analysed later on by both students and language teachers. The reason for such state of affairs lies in their academic formation, of a mainly general stream, which has enabled them only for knowledge of the foreign language, but not for the translation as a tool as it is required only when they reach the tertiary level. Besides, for their translations they rely, most of the times, on glossaries, whose dominant language is portuguese of Brazil, which is, obviously, much different from the portuguese mother tongue reality and even more of English. So it seems necessary to use with caution the working tools (glossaries) that work as surpluses, but could bring translation problems as we will see.