Diane Arbus: the wonderful wizard of odds or the poetics of the i (eye)

Diane Arbus‘ photographs are mainly about difference. Most of the time she is trying ‗[…] to suppress, or at least reduce, moral and sensory queasiness‘ (Sontag 1977: 40) in order to represent a world where the subject of the photograph is not merely the ‗other‘ but also the I. Her technique does not coax her subjects into natural poses. Instead she encourages them to be strange and awkward. By posing for her, the revelation of the self is identified with what is odd. This paper aims at understanding the geography of difference that, at the same time, is also of resistance, since Diane Arbus reveals what was forcefully hidden by bringing it into light in such a way that it is impossible to ignore. Her photographs display a poetic beauty that is not only of the ‗I‘ but also of the ‗eye‘. The world that is depicted is one in which we are all the same. She ―atomizes‖ reality by separating each element and ‗Instead of showing identity between things which are different […] everybody is shown to look the same.‘ (Sontag 1977: 47). Furthermore, this paper analyses some of Arbus‘ photographs so as to explain this point of view, by trying to argue that between rejecting and reacting against what is standardized she does not forget the geography of the body which is also a geography of the self. While creating a new imagetic topos, where what is trivial becomes divine, she also presents the frailty of others as our own.

À la quete du salut dans la peste et dans en attendant, Godot

Soit La peste soit En attendant Godot traitent de l‘absurde de la condition humaine et de la quête du salut. La vie se présente sans avenir et comme un enchaînement de scènes pénibles qui se ressemblent. L‘humanité veut désespérément atteindre le bonheur et préserver sa dignité, mais, malgré tout effort, rien ne change : c‘est la terrible stabilité du monde. Presque tous les personnages manquent d‘identité. Ce sont des prisonniers de leur propre existence; des guignols manipulés arbitrairement par le destin; des victimes de la gratuité de la grâce divine. Les personnages, le temps, l‘espace, le langage, les silences, tout y sert à exprimer l‘absurde de la condition humaine. Dans ces deux oeuvres, l‘air est plein de cris de révolte. Les plaintes deviennent le langage naturel de l‘humanité souffrante, parce que, après tout, ni Godot ni le salut n‘arrivent jamais.