Financing social ventures by crowdfunding: The inflluence of entrepreneurs’ personality traits

Purpose – This research aims to understand the role played by social entrepreneurs’ personality traits on the choice between the traditional donation model and social crowdfunding (CF) to finance social projects. Design/methodology/approach – Social CF is examined as an instrument to capture funds for social projects, and the particular case of the Portuguese Social Stock Exchange (PSSE) is presented. The approach is quantitative in nature and the data were collected through a questionnaire that was emailed to non-governmental organizations in Portugal and founders of the projects listed on PSSE. Logistic regression was employed to predict the probability that a social entrepreneur would use PSSE rather than traditional financing. The predictor variables were based on the big five personality traits. Findings – Our investigation reveals that the agreeableness and neuroticism factors were not even considered in the results of the factorial analysis, which indicates the minor importance of these personality traits in the funding decisions of the Portuguese social entrepreneurs. The same applies to the factors of openness to new experiences and extraversion, which, although considered in the logistic analysis, showed no statistical significance. Finally, the conscientiousness personality trait seems to be the only factor that might explain the use of the PSSE platform.Originality/value – Studies on the profile of the social entrepreneurs that use CF for financing social projects are relatively rare, specifically in the context of Social Stock Exchange platforms. Additionally, there is a need to carry out more empirical evidence about the effect of social entrepreneurs’ personality traits on the decision to finance social projects through social CF platforms vis-a-vis the traditional donation model.

Personality, emotion, and mood in agent-based group decision making

Group decision making plays an important role in organizations, especially in the present-day economy that demands high-quality, yet quick decisions. Group decision-support systems (GDSSs) are interactive computer-based environments that support concerted, coordinated team efforts toward the completion of joint tasks. The need for collaborative work in organizations has led to the development of a set of general collaborative computer-supported technologies and specific GDSSs that support distributed groups (in time and space) in various domains. However, each person is unique and has different reactions to various arguments. Many times a disagreement arises because of the way we began arguing, not because of the content itself. Nevertheless, emotion, mood, and personality factors have not yet been addressed in GDSSs, despite how strongly they influence results. Our group’s previous work considered the roles that emotion and mood play in decision making. In this article, we reformulate these factors and include personality as well. Thus, this work incorporates personality, emotion, and mood in the negotiation process of an argumentbased group decision-making process. Our main goal in this work is to improve the negotiation process through argumentation using the affective characteristics of the involved participants. Each participant agent represents a group decision member. This representation lets us simulate people with different personalities. The discussion process between group members (agents) is made through the exchange of persuasive arguments. Although our multiagent architecture model4 includes two types of agents—the facilitator and the participant— this article focuses on the emotional, personality, and argumentation components of the participant agent.

Adaptação Cultural e Validação do Questionário: “Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire” para a População Portuguesa

Introdução: A prática de atividade física tem vindo a ser incentivada por vários organismos nacionais e internacionais, visando a promoção de saúde. No entanto, não existe consenso em relação à influência e à intensidade ótima da atividade física durante a gravidez, tal facto pode dever-se à falta de instrumentos válidos que permitam a comparação entre os vários países do nível de atividade física das gestantes. Não foi identificado qualquer questionário válido que avaliasse a atividade física, durante a gravidez, para a população portuguesa. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi traduzir e adaptar o questionário PPAQ para a língua portuguesa e testar a fiabilidade e validade do mesmo. Métodos: A equivalência linguística foi obtida através da tradução e retrotradução e após a realização de um teste piloto a 6 mulheres grávidas. A fiabilidade foi obtida através do testereteste, com um intervalo de 7 dias, e analisada através do ICC, SEM e do método Bland Altman. A validade de critério foi testada, através dos resultados do PPAQ e do acelerómetro, pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Resultados: Os valores do ICC relativos à fiabilidade foram para o score total do PPAQ de 0,77, para as atividades sedentárias 0,87, para as atividade de baixa intensidade 0,76, para as atividades de intensidade moderada 0,76 e para as atividades de intensidade vigorosa 0,70. Na avaliação da validade obtivemos um valor de correlação de Pearson para atividade total de -0,030. Obtivemos correlação significante para as atividades de baixa intensidade (r=0,149; p=0,025), para as atividades de baixa intensidade em grávidas no 2º trimestre (r=0,256; p=0,010) e para as atividades de baixa intensidade e atividades vigorosas em mulheres no 3º trimestre gestacional (r=0,447; p=0,037 e r= 0,578; p=0,005, respetivamente). Conclusão: O PPAQ apresenta uma fiabilidade excelente e validade semelhante à versão original.