Efeitos de um Programa de Reabilitação Respiratória em Indivíduos Operados a Cancro do Pulmão

O tratamento cirúrgico e os tratamentos coadjuvantes do cancro do pulmão de não pequenas células (CPNPC), como a quimioterapia, afetam negativamente a saúde física e psicológica dos pacientes. Um programa de reabilitação respiratória (PRR) pode ajudar no controlo de sintomas, melhorar a capacidade funcional e a qualidade de vida desta população. Objetivo: verificar a influência de um programa de reabilitação respiratória composto por fisioterapia torácica, treino aeróbio, treino de força e educação para a saúde, em parâmetros como a qualidade de vida, a ansiedade e depressão, a dispneia, a capacidade funcional para realizar exercício e a força muscular, em 6 doentes operados a CPNPC. Métodos: estudo retrospetivo, do tipo série de estudos de caso, que incluiu 6 casos clínicos. As medidas de resultados utilizadas foram: qualidade de vida; dispneia; ansiedade e depressão; capacidade funcional para a marcha; e força muscular. Resultados: no final do PRR, os 6 participantes apresentaram melhoria nos níveis de qualidade de vida, uma diminuição nos valores de ansiedade e depressão e um grau de dispneia inferior ao avaliado inicialmente. Foi ainda verificado um aumento da capacidade funcional para o exercício e da força muscular em todos os casos clínicos. Conclusão: O PRR pareceu produzir efeitos positivos na diminuição dos sintomas, assim como melhorou a qualidade de vida, a capacidade funcional para a marcha e a força muscular dos 6 participantes.

Trace metals in size-fractionated particulate matter in a Portuguese hospital: exposure risks assessment and comparisons with other countries

Hospitals are considered as a special and important type of indoor public place where air quality has significant impacts on potential health outcomes. Information on indoor air quality of these environments, concerning exposures to particulate matter (PM) and related toxicity, is limited though. This work aims to evaluate risks associated with inhalation exposure to ten toxic metals and chlorine (As, Ni, Cr, Cd, Pb, Mn, Se, Ba, Al, Si, and Cl) in coarse (PM2.5–10) and fine (PM2.5) particles in a Portuguese hospital in comparison with studies representative of other countries. Samples were collected during 1 month in one urban hospital; elemental PM characterization was determined by proton-induced X-ray emission. Noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks were assessed according to the methodology provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA; Region III Risk-Based Concentration Table) for three different age categories of hospital personnel (adults, >20, and <65 years) and patients (considering nine different age groups, i.e., children of 1–3 years to seniors of >65 years). The estimated noncarcinogenic risks due to occupational inhalation exposure to PM2.5-bound metals ranged from 5.88×10−6 for Se (adults, 55–64 years) to 9.35×10−1 for As (adults, 20–24 years) with total noncarcinogenic risks (sum of all metals) above the safe level for all three age categories. As and Cl (the latter due to its high abundances) were the most important contributors (approximately 90 %) to noncarcinogenic risks. For PM2.5–10, noncarcinogenic risks of all metals were acceptable to all age groups. Concerning carcinogenic risks, for Ni and Pb, they were negligible (<1×10−6) in both PM fractions for all age groups of hospital personnel; potential risks were observed for As and Cr with values in PM2.5 exceeding (up to 62 and 5 times, respectively) USEPA guideline across all age groups; for PM2.5–10, increased excess risks of As and Cr were observed particularly for long-term exposures (adults, 55–64 years). Total carcinogenic risks highly (up to 67 times) exceeded the recommended level for all age groups, thus clearly showing that occupational exposure to metals in fine particles pose significant risks. If the extensive working hours of hospital medical staff were considered, the respective noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks were increased, the latter for PM2.5 exceeding the USEPA cumulative guideline of 10−4. For adult patients, the estimated noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks were approximately three times higher than for personnel, with particular concerns observed for children and adolescents.