5 resultados para Patient Questionnaires

em Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Objectives : The purpose of this article is to find out differences between surveys using paper and online questionnaires. The author has deep knowledge in the case of questions concerning opinions in the development of survey based research, e.g. the limits of postal and online questionnaires. Methods : In the physician studies carried out in 1995 (doctors graduated in 1982-1991), 2000 (doctors graduated in 1982-1996), 2005 (doctors graduated in 1982-2001), 2011 (doctors graduated in 1977-2006) and 457 family doctors in 2000, were used paper and online questionnaires. The response rates were 64%, 68%, 64%, 49% and 73%, respectively. Results : The results of the physician studies showed that there were differences between methods. These differences were connected with using paper-based questionnaire and online questionnaire and response rate. The online-based survey gave a lower response rate than the postal survey. The major advantages of online survey were short response time; very low financial resource needs and data were directly loaded in the data analysis software, thus saved time and resources associated with the data entry process. Conclusions : The current article helps researchers with planning the study design and choosing of the right data collection method.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Introdução: Não existe um consenso quanto ao melhor tratamento para a radiculopatia cervical pois existe uma grande variedade de manifestações clínicas e opções terapêuticas, mas a sua selecção vai depender do caso particular do utente, sugerindo assim uma correcta avaliação do Fisioterapeuta. Objectivo: Este estudo pretende descrever e avaliar a efectividade de um programa de Fisioterapia num caso de radiculopatia cervical, na dor, funcionalidade e percepção da qualidade de vida. Participantes e Métodos: Estudo observacional descritivo tipo estudo de caso de um utente de 56 anos de idade, com radiculopatia cervical. Para a avaliação foram utilizados testes ortopédicos, a escala visual analógica e os questionários de incapacidade funcional da cervical e do membro superior bem como da percepção da qualidade de vida. Estes questionários foram aplicados em 3 momentos, antes da intervenção, no final e após 6 semanas e os restantes instrumentos foram utilizados em diversos momentos ao longo da intervenção. Esta foi efectuada duas vezes por semana, ao longo de 10 semanas recorrendo a técnicas de terapia manual, exercícios de controlo motor e educação do utente. Resultados: Verificou-se que a dor na cervical passou de 6,5 para 2/10 EVA e no cotovelo direito de 7,3 para 2/10. A resposta ao questionário de incapacidade funcional na cervical variou de 40% no primeiro momento para 11,1% no segundo, o da incapacidade funcional do membro superior variou de 63,6% para 33,5% e o questionário da percepção da qualidade de vida variou de 55,01 para 68,69. Seis semanas após a intervenção, todos estes resultados se mantinham praticamente inalterados. Conclusão: Este caso permitiu demonstrar o processo de raciocínio clínico efectuado ao longo de dez semanas de intervenção em que se utilizou uma abordagem centrada no utente, baseada na evidência científica e na experiência clínica anterior. Os resultados alcançados foram de encontro às expectativas iniciais e parecem evidenciar que, neste caso, o programa de fisioterapia teve efeitos positivos na dor, funcionalidade e percepção da qualidade de vida.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background Gastric cancer remains a serious health concern worldwide. Patients would greatly benefit from the discovery of new biomarkers that predict outcome more accurately and allow better treatment and follow-up decisions. Here, we used a retrospective, observational study to assess the expression and prognostic value of the transcription factors SOX2 and CDX2 in gastric cancer. Methods SOX2, CDX2, MUC5AC and MUC2 expression were assessed in 201 gastric tumors by immunohistochemistry. SOX2 and CDX2 expression were crossed with clinicopathological and follow-up data to determine their impact on tumor behavior and outcome. Moreover, SOX2 locus copy number status was assessed by FISH (N = 21) and Copy Number Variation Assay (N = 62). Results SOX2 was expressed in 52% of the gastric tumors and was significantly associated with male gender, T stage and N stage. Moreover, SOX2 expression predicted poorer patient survival, and the combination with CDX2 defined two molecular phenotypes, SOX2+CDX2- versus SOX2-CDX2+, that predict the worst and the best long-term patients’ outcome. These profiles combined with clinicopathological parameters stratify the prognosis of patients with intestinal and expanding tumors and in those without signs of venous invasion. Finally, SOX2 locus copy number gains were found in 93% of the samples reaching the amplification threshold in 14% and significantly associating with protein expression. Conclusions We showed, for the first time, that SOX2 combined with CDX2 expression profile in gastric cancer segregate patients into different prognostic groups, complementing the clinicopathological information. We further demonstrate a molecular mechanism for SOX2 expression in a subset of gastric cancer cases.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Objective Patient-centredness has become an important aspect of health service delivery; however, there are a limited number of studies that focus on this concept in the domain of hearing healthcare. The objective of this study was to examine and compare audiologists’ preferences for patient-centredness in Portugal, India and Iran. Design The study used a cross-sectional survey design with audiologists recruited from three different countries. Participants A total of 191 fully-completed responses were included in the analysis (55 from Portugal, 78 from India and 58 from Iran). Main outcome measure The Patient–Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS). Results PPOS mean scores suggest that audiologists have a preference for patient-centredness (ie, mean of 3.6 in a 5-point scale). However, marked differences were observed between specific PPOS items suggesting these preferences vary across clinical situations. A significant level of difference (p<0.001) was found between audiologists’ preferences for patient-centredness in three countries. Audiologists in Portugal had a greater preference for patient-centredness when compared to audiologists in India and Iran, although no significant differences were found in terms of age and duration of experience among these sample populations. Conclusions There are differences and similarities in audiologists’ preferences for patient-centredness among countries. These findings may have implications for the training of professionals and also for clinical practice in terms of optimising hearing healthcare across countries.