3 resultados para Non–small-cell lung cancer
em Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal
Resumo:
O tratamento cirúrgico e os tratamentos coadjuvantes do cancro do pulmão de não pequenas células (CPNPC), como a quimioterapia, afetam negativamente a saúde física e psicológica dos pacientes. Um programa de reabilitação respiratória (PRR) pode ajudar no controlo de sintomas, melhorar a capacidade funcional e a qualidade de vida desta população. Objetivo: verificar a influência de um programa de reabilitação respiratória composto por fisioterapia torácica, treino aeróbio, treino de força e educação para a saúde, em parâmetros como a qualidade de vida, a ansiedade e depressão, a dispneia, a capacidade funcional para realizar exercício e a força muscular, em 6 doentes operados a CPNPC. Métodos: estudo retrospetivo, do tipo série de estudos de caso, que incluiu 6 casos clínicos. As medidas de resultados utilizadas foram: qualidade de vida; dispneia; ansiedade e depressão; capacidade funcional para a marcha; e força muscular. Resultados: no final do PRR, os 6 participantes apresentaram melhoria nos níveis de qualidade de vida, uma diminuição nos valores de ansiedade e depressão e um grau de dispneia inferior ao avaliado inicialmente. Foi ainda verificado um aumento da capacidade funcional para o exercício e da força muscular em todos os casos clínicos. Conclusão: O PRR pareceu produzir efeitos positivos na diminuição dos sintomas, assim como melhorou a qualidade de vida, a capacidade funcional para a marcha e a força muscular dos 6 participantes.
Resumo:
Air pollution represents a serious risk not only to environment and human health, but also to historical heritage. In this study, air pollution of the Oporto Metropolitan Area and its main impacts were characterized. The results showed that levels of CO, PM10 and SO2 have been continuously decreasing in the respective metropolitan area while levels of NOx and NO2 have not changed significantly. Traffic emissions were the main source of the determined polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs; 16 PAHs considered by U.S. EPA as priority pollutants, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene and benzo[j]fluoranthene) in air of the respective metropolitan area. The mean concentration of 18 PAHs in air was 69.9±39.7 ng m−3 with 3–4 rings PAHs accounting for 75% of the total ΣPAHs. The health risk analysis of PAHs in air showed that the estimated values of lifetime lung cancer risks considerably exceeded the health-based guideline level. Analytical results also confirm that historical monuments in urban areas act as passive repositories for air pollutants present in the surrounding atmosphere. FTIR and EDX analyses showed that gypsum was the most important constituent of black crusts of the characterized historical monument Monastery of Serra do Pilar classified as “UNESCO World Cultural Heritage”. In black crusts, 4–6 rings compounds accounted approximately for 85% of ΣPAHs. The diagnostic ratios confirmed that traffic emissions were the major source of PAHs in black crusts; PAH composition profiles were very similar for crusts and PM10 and PM2.5.
Resumo:
Considering tobacco smoke as one of the most health-relevant indoor sources, the aim of this work was to further understand its negative impacts on human health. The specific objectives of this work were to evaluate the levels of particulate-bound PAHs in smoking and non-smoking homes and to assess the risks associated with inhalation exposure to these compounds. The developed work concerned the application of the toxicity equivalency factors approach (including the estimation of the lifetime lung cancer risks, WHO) and the methodology established by USEPA (considering three different age categories) to 18 PAHs detected in inhalable (PM10) and fine (PM2.5) particles at two homes. The total concentrations of 18 PAHs (ΣPAHs) was 17.1 and 16.6 ng m−3 in PM10 and PM2.5 at smoking home and 7.60 and 7.16 ng m−3 in PM10 and PM2.5 at non-smoking one. Compounds with five and six rings composed the majority of the particulate PAHs content (i.e., 73 and 78 % of ΣPAHs at the smoking and non-smoking home, respectively). Target carcinogenic risks exceeded USEPA health-based guideline at smoking home for 2 different age categories. Estimated values of lifetime lung cancer risks largely exceeded (68–200 times) the health-based guideline levels at both homes thus demonstrating that long-term exposure to PAHs at the respective levels would eventually cause risk of developing cancer. The high determined values of cancer risks in the absence of smoking were probably caused by contribution of PAHs from outdoor sources.