Longitudinal analysis of tumor marker CEA of breast cancer patients from Braga's hospital

Allied to an epidemiological study of population of the Senology Unit of Braga’s Hospital that have been diagnosed with malignant breast cancer, we describe the progression in time of repeated measurements of tumor marker Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Our main purpose is to describe the progression of this tumor marker as a function of possible risk factors and, hence, to understand how these risk factors influences that progression. The response variable, values of CEA, was analyzed making use of longitudinal models, testing for different correlation structures. The same covariates used in a previous survival analysis were considered in the longitudinal model. The reference time used was time from diagnose until death from breast cancer. For diagnostic of the models fitted we have used empirical and theoretical variograms. To evaluate the fixed term of the longitudinal model we have tested for a changing point on the effect of time on the tumor marker progression. A longitudinal model was also fitted only to the subset of patients that died from breast cancer, using the reference time as time from date of death until blood test.

Macrophages as biomarkers in BCG treatment response in bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a common urologic cancer and the majority has origin in the urothelium. Patients with intermediate and high risk of recurrence/progression bladder cancer are treated with intravesical instillation with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, however, approximately 30% of patients do not respond to treatment. At the moment, there are no accepted biomarkers do predict treatment outcome and an early identification of patients better served by alternative therapeutics. The treatment initiates a cascade of cytokines responsible by recruiting macrophages to the tumor site that have been shown to influence treatment outcome. Effective BCG therapy needs precise activation of the Th1 immune pathway associated with M1 polarized macrophages. However, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) often assume an immunoregulatory M2 phenotype, either immunosuppressive or angiogenic, that interfere in different ways with the BCG induced antitumor immune response. The M2 macrophage is influenced by different microenvironments in the stroma and the tumor. In particular, the degree of hypoxia in the tumors is responsible by the recruitment and differentiation of macrophages into the M2 angiogenic phenotype, suggested to be associated with the response to treatment. Nevertheless, neither the macrophage phenotypes present nor the influence of localization and hypoxia have been addressed in previous studies. Therefore, this work devoted to study the influence of TAMs, in particular of the M2 phenotype taking into account their localization (stroma or tumor) and the degree of hypoxia in the tumor (low or high) in BCG treatment outcome. The study included 99 bladder cancer patients treated with BCG. Tumors resected prior to treatment were evaluated using immunohistochemistry for CD68 and CD163 antigens, which identify a lineage macrophage marker and a M2-polarized specific cell surface receptor, respectively. Tumor hypoxia was evaluated based on HIF-1α expression. As a main finding it was observed that a high predominance of CD163+ macrophage counts in the stroma of tumors under low hypoxia was associated with BCG immunotherapy failure, possibly due to its immunosuppressive phenotype. This study further reinforces the importance the tumor microenvironment in the modulation of BCG responses.

Regulation of histone H2A.Z expression is mediated by sirtuin 1 in prostate cancer

Histone variants seem to play a major role in gene expression regulation. In prostate cancer, H2A.Z and its acetylated form are implicated in oncogenes’ upregulation. SIRT1, which may act either as tumor suppressor or oncogene, reduces H2A.Z levels in cardiomyocytes, via proteasome-mediated degradation, and this mechanism might be impaired in prostate cancer cells due to sirtuin 1 downregulation. Thus, we aimed to characterize the mechanisms underlying H2A.Z and SIRT1 deregulation in prostate carcinogenesis and how they interact. We found that H2AFZ and SIRT1 were up- and downregulated, respectively, at transcript level in primary prostate cancer and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia compared to normal prostatic tissues. Induced SIRT1 overexpression in prostate cancer cell lines resulted in almost complete absence of H2A.Z. Inhibition of mTOR had a modest effect on H2A.Z levels, but proteasome inhibition prevented the marked reduction of H2A.Z due to sirtuin 1 overexpression. Prostate cancer cells exposed to epigenetic modifying drugs trichostatin A, alone or combined with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine, increased H2AFZ transcript, although with a concomitant decrease in protein levels. Conversely, SIRT1 transcript and protein levels increased after exposure. ChIP revealed an increase of activation marks within the TSS region for both genes. Remarkably, inhibition of sirtuin 1 with nicotinamide, increased H2A.Z levels, whereas activation of sirtuin 1 by resveratrol led to an abrupt decrease in H2A.Z. Finally, protein-ligation assay showed that exposure to epigenetic modifying drugs fostered the interaction between sirtuin 1 and H2A.Z. We concluded that sirtuin 1 and H2A.Z deregulation in prostate cancer are reciprocally related. Epigenetic mechanisms, mostly histone post-translational modifications, are likely involved and impair sirtuin 1-mediated downregulation of H2A.Z via proteasome-mediated degradation. Epigenetic modifying drugs in conjunction with enzymatic modulators are able to restore the normal functions of sirtuin 1 and might constitute relevant tools for targeted therapy of prostate cancer patients