1 resultado para Alcohol, Alexithymia, Frontal lobe
em Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (7)
- Aston University Research Archive (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (19)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (15)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (69)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (15)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- Duke University (23)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (47)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (84)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (10)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (128)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (232)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (14)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (48)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (84)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (26)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (17)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
Two chromatographic methods, gas chromatography with flow ionization detection (GC–FID) and liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (LC–UV), were used to determine furfuryl alcohol in several kinds of foundry resins, after application of an optimised extraction procedure. The GC method developed gave feasibility that did not depend on resin kind. Analysis by LC was suitable just for furanic resins. The presence of interference in the phenolic resins did not allow an appropriate quantification by LC. Both methods gave accurate and precise results. Recoveries were >94%; relative standard deviations were ≤7 and ≤0.3%, respectively for GC and LC methods. Good relative deviations between the two methods were found (≤3%).