Competitive analysis of static-priority partitioned scheduling on uniform multiprocessors

Consider the problem of scheduling a set of sporadically arriving tasks on a uniform multiprocessor with the goal of meeting deadlines. A processor p has the speed Sp. Tasks can be preempted but they cannot migrate between processors. On each processor, tasks are scheduled according to rate-monotonic. We propose an algorithm that can schedule all task sets that any other possible algorithm can schedule assuming that our algorithm is given processors that are √2 / √2−1 ≈ 3.41 times faster. No such guarantees are previously known for partitioned static-priority scheduling on uniform multiprocessors.

Scheduling arbitrary-deadline sporadic task systems on multiprocessors

A new algorithm is proposed for scheduling preemptible arbitrary-deadline sporadic task systems upon multiprocessor platforms, with interprocessor migration permitted. This algorithm is based on a task-splitting approach - while most tasks are entirely assigned to specific processors, a few tasks (fewer than the number of processors) may be split across two processors. This algorithm can be used for two distinct purposes: for actually scheduling specific sporadic task systems, and for feasibility analysis. Simulation- based evaluation indicates that this algorithm offers a significant improvement on the ability to schedule arbitrary- deadline sporadic task systems as compared to the contemporary state-of-art. With regard to feasibility analysis, the new algorithm is proved to offer superior performance guarantees in comparison to prior feasibility tests.

Suporte à computação paralela e distribuída em Java: distribuição e execução de trabalho

Nos últimos anos começaram a ser vulgares os computadores dotados de multiprocessadores e multi-cores. De modo a aproveitar eficientemente as novas características desse hardware começaram a surgir ferramentas para facilitar o desenvolvimento de software paralelo, através de linguagens e frameworks, adaptadas a diferentes linguagens. Com a grande difusão de redes de alta velocidade, tal como Gigabit Ethernet e a última geração de redes Wi-Fi, abre-se a oportunidade de, além de paralelizar o processamento entre processadores e cores, poder em simultâneo paralelizá-lo entre máquinas diferentes. Ao modelo que permite paralelizar processamento localmente e em simultâneo distribuí-lo para máquinas que também têm capacidade de o paralelizar, chamou-se “modelo paralelo distribuído”. Nesta dissertação foram analisadas técnicas e ferramentas utilizadas para fazer programação paralela e o trabalho que está feito dentro da área de programação paralela e distribuída. Tendo estes dois factores em consideração foi proposta uma framework que tenta aplicar a simplicidade da programação paralela ao conceito paralelo distribuído. A proposta baseia-se na disponibilização de uma framework em Java com uma interface de programação simples, de fácil aprendizagem e legibilidade que, de forma transparente, é capaz de paralelizar e distribuir o processamento. Apesar de simples, existiu um esforço para a tornar configurável de forma a adaptar-se ao máximo de situações possível. Nesta dissertação serão exploradas especialmente as questões relativas à execução e distribuição de trabalho, e a forma como o código é enviado de forma automática pela rede, para outros nós cooperantes, evitando assim a instalação manual das aplicações em todos os nós da rede. Para confirmar a validade deste conceito e das ideias defendidas nesta dissertação foi implementada esta framework à qual se chamou DPF4j (Distributed Parallel Framework for JAVA) e foram feitos testes e retiradas métricas para verificar a existência de ganhos de performance em relação às soluções já existentes.

Task assignment algorithms for two-type heterogeneous multiprocessors

Consider the problem of assigning implicit-deadline sporadic tasks on a heterogeneous multiprocessor platform comprising two different types of processors—such a platform is referred to as two-type platform. We present two low degree polynomial time-complexity algorithms, SA and SA-P, each providing the following guarantee. For a given two-type platform and a task set, if there exists a task assignment such that tasks can be scheduled to meet deadlines by allowing them to migrate only between processors of the same type (intra-migrative), then (i) using SA, it is guaranteed to find such an assignment where the same restriction on task migration applies but given a platform in which processors are 1+α/2 times faster and (ii) SA-P succeeds in finding a task assignment where tasks are not allowed to migrate between processors (non-migrative) but given a platform in which processors are 1+α times faster. The parameter 0<α≤1 is a property of the task set; it is the maximum of all the task utilizations that are no greater than 1. We evaluate average-case performance of both the algorithms by generating task sets randomly and measuring how much faster processors the algorithms need (which is upper bounded by 1+α/2 for SA and 1+α for SA-P) in order to output a feasible task assignment (intra-migrative for SA and non-migrative for SA-P). In our evaluations, for the vast majority of task sets, these algorithms require significantly smaller processor speedup than indicated by their theoretical bounds. Finally, we consider a special case where no task utilization in the given task set can exceed one and for this case, we (re-)prove the performance guarantees of SA and SA-P. We show, for both of the algorithms, that changing the adversary from intra-migrative to a more powerful one, namely fully-migrative, in which tasks can migrate between processors of any type, does not deteriorate the performance guarantees. For this special case, we compare the average-case performance of SA-P and a state-of-the-art algorithm by generating task sets randomly. In our evaluations, SA-P outperforms the state-of-the-art by requiring much smaller processor speedup and by running orders of magnitude faster.

Task Assignment Algorithms for Heterogeneous Multiprocessors

Consider the problem of assigning implicit-deadline sporadic tasks on a heterogeneous multiprocessor platform comprising a constant number (denoted by t) of distinct types of processors—such a platform is referred to as a t-type platform. We present two algorithms, LPGIM and LPGNM, each providing the following guarantee. For a given t-type platform and a task set, if there exists a task assignment such that tasks can be scheduled to meet their deadlines by allowing them to migrate only between processors of the same type (intra-migrative), then: (i) LPGIM succeeds in finding such an assignment where the same restriction on task migration applies (intra-migrative) but given a platform in which only one processor of each type is 1 + α × t-1/t times faster and (ii) LPGNM succeeds in finding a task assignment where tasks are not allowed to migrate between processors (non-migrative) but given a platform in which every processor is 1 + α times faster. The parameter α is a property of the task set; it is the maximum of all the task utilizations that are no greater than one. To the best of our knowledge, for t-type heterogeneous multiprocessors: (i) for the problem of intra-migrative task assignment, no previous algorithm exists with a proven bound and hence our algorithm, LPGIM, is the first of its kind and (ii) for the problem of non-migrative task assignment, our algorithm, LPGNM, has superior performance compared to state-of-the-art.

Unified overhead-aware schedulability analysis for slot-based task-splitting

Hard real- time multiprocessor scheduling has seen, in recent years, the flourishing of semi-partitioned scheduling algorithms. This category of scheduling schemes combines elements of partitioned and global scheduling for the purposes of achieving efficient utilization of the system’s processing resources with strong schedulability guarantees and with low dispatching overheads. The sub-class of slot-based “task-splitting” scheduling algorithms, in particular, offers very good trade-offs between schedulability guarantees (in the form of high utilization bounds) and the number of preemptions/migrations involved. However, so far there did not exist unified scheduling theory for such algorithms; each one was formulated in its own accompanying analysis. This article changes this fragmented landscape by formulating a more unified schedulability theory covering the two state-of-the-art slot-based semi-partitioned algorithms, S-EKG and NPS-F (both fixed job-priority based). This new theory is based on exact schedulability tests, thus also overcoming many sources of pessimism in existing analysis. In turn, since schedulability testing guides the task assignment under the schemes in consideration, we also formulate an improved task assignment procedure. As the other main contribution of this article, and as a response to the fact that many unrealistic assumptions, present in the original theory, tend to undermine the theoretical potential of such scheduling schemes, we identified and modelled into the new analysis all overheads incurred by the algorithms in consideration. The outcome is a new overhead-aware schedulability analysis that permits increased efficiency and reliability. The merits of this new theory are evaluated by an extensive set of experiments.

CPMD-mindful task assignment for NPS-F

The multiprocessor scheduling scheme NPS-F for sporadic tasks has a high utilisation bound and an overall number of preemptions bounded at design time. NPS-F binpacks tasks offline to as many servers as needed. At runtime, the scheduler ensures that each server is mapped to at most one of the m processors, at any instant. When scheduled, servers use EDF to select which of their tasks to run. Yet, unlike the overall number of preemptions, the migrations per se are not tightly bounded. Moreover, we cannot know a priori which task a server will be currently executing at the instant when it migrates. This uncertainty complicates the estimation of cache-related preemption and migration costs (CPMD), potentially resulting in their overestimation. Therefore, to simplify the CPMD estimation, we propose an amended bin-packing scheme for NPS-F allowing us (i) to identify at design time, which task migrates at which instant and (ii) bound a priori the number of migrating tasks, while preserving the utilisation bound of NPS-F.

An optimal boundary fair scheduling

Nowadays, many real-time operating systems discretize the time relying on a system time unit. To take this behavior into account, real-time scheduling algorithms must adopt a discrete-time model in which both timing requirements of tasks and their time allocations have to be integer multiples of the system time unit. That is, tasks cannot be executed for less than one time unit, which implies that they always have to achieve a minimum amount of work before they can be preempted. Assuming such a discrete-time model, the authors of Zhu et al. (Proceedings of the 24th IEEE international real-time systems symposium (RTSS 2003), 2003, J Parallel Distrib Comput 71(10):1411–1425, 2011) proposed an efficient “boundary fair” algorithm (named BF) and proved its optimality for the scheduling of periodic tasks while achieving full system utilization. However, BF cannot handle sporadic tasks due to their inherent irregular and unpredictable job release patterns. In this paper, we propose an optimal boundary-fair scheduling algorithm for sporadic tasks (named BF TeX ), which follows the same principle as BF by making scheduling decisions only at the job arrival times and (expected) task deadlines. This new algorithm was implemented in Linux and we show through experiments conducted upon a multicore machine that BF TeX outperforms the state-of-the-art discrete-time optimal scheduler (PD TeX ), benefiting from much less scheduling overheads. Furthermore, it appears from these experimental results that BF TeX is barely dependent on the length of the system time unit while PD TeX —the only other existing solution for the scheduling of sporadic tasks in discrete-time systems—sees its number of preemptions, migrations and the time spent to take scheduling decisions increasing linearly when improving the time resolution of the system.

Provably Good Task Assignment for Two-Type Heterogeneous Multiprocessors Using Cutting Planes

Consider scheduling of real-time tasks on a multiprocessor where migration is forbidden. Specifically, consider the problem of determining a task-to-processor assignment for a given collection of implicit-deadline sporadic tasks upon a multiprocessor platform in which there are two distinct types of processors. For this problem, we propose a new algorithm, LPC (task assignment based on solving a Linear Program with Cutting planes). The algorithm offers the following guarantee: for a given task set and a platform, if there exists a feasible task-to-processor assignment, then LPC succeeds in finding such a feasible task-to-processor assignment as well but on a platform in which each processor is 1.5 × faster and has three additional processors. For systems with a large number of processors, LPC has a better approximation ratio than state-of-the-art algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that develops a provably good real-time task assignment algorithm using cutting planes.

Real-time scheduling with resource sharing on heterogeneous multiprocessors

Consider the problem of scheduling a task set τ of implicit-deadline sporadic tasks to meet all deadlines on a t-type heterogeneous multiprocessor platform where tasks may access multiple shared resources. The multiprocessor platform has m k processors of type-k, where k∈{1,2,…,t}. The execution time of a task depends on the type of processor on which it executes. The set of shared resources is denoted by R. For each task τ i , there is a resource set R i ⊆R such that for each job of τ i , during one phase of its execution, the job requests to hold the resource set R i exclusively with the interpretation that (i) the job makes a single request to hold all the resources in the resource set R i and (ii) at all times, when a job of τ i holds R i , no other job holds any resource in R i . Each job of task τ i may request the resource set R i at most once during its execution. A job is allowed to migrate when it requests a resource set and when it releases the resource set but a job is not allowed to migrate at other times. Our goal is to design a scheduling algorithm for this problem and prove its performance. We propose an algorithm, LP-EE-vpr, which offers the guarantee that if an implicit-deadline sporadic task set is schedulable on a t-type heterogeneous multiprocessor platform by an optimal scheduling algorithm that allows a job to migrate only when it requests or releases a resource set, then our algorithm also meets the deadlines with the same restriction on job migration, if given processors 4×(1+MAXP×⌈|P|×MAXPmin{m1,m2,…,mt}⌉) times as fast. (Here MAXP and |P| are computed based on the resource sets that tasks request.) For the special case that each task requests at most one resource, the bound of LP-EE-vpr collapses to 4×(1+⌈|R|min{m1,m2,…,mt}⌉). To the best of our knowledge, LP-EE-vpr is the first algorithm with proven performance guarantee for real-time scheduling of sporadic tasks with resource sharing on t-type heterogeneous multiprocessors.

Online Admission of Parallel Real-Time Tasks

6th Real-Time Scheduling Open Problems Seminar (RTSOPS 2015), Lund, Sweden.

Considerations on the Least Upper Bound for Mixed-Criticality Real-Time Systems

5th Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering, SBESC 2015 (SBESC 2015). 3 to 6, Nov, 2015. Foz do Iguaçu, Brasil.

Real-Time Support in the Proposal for Fine-Grained Parallelism in Ada

Presented at Work in Progress Session, IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS 2015). 1 to 3, Dec, 2015. San Antonio, U.S.A..

Real-time Task-Splitting scheduling algorithms framework

Nos dias de hoje, os sistemas de tempo real crescem em importância e complexidade. Mediante a passagem do ambiente uniprocessador para multiprocessador, o trabalho realizado no primeiro não é completamente aplicável no segundo, dado que o nível de complexidade difere, principalmente devido à existência de múltiplos processadores no sistema. Cedo percebeu-se, que a complexidade do problema não cresce linearmente com a adição destes. Na verdade, esta complexidade apresenta-se como uma barreira ao avanço científico nesta área que, para já, se mantém desconhecida, e isto testemunha-se, essencialmente no caso de escalonamento de tarefas. A passagem para este novo ambiente, quer se trate de sistemas de tempo real ou não, promete gerar a oportunidade de realizar trabalho que no primeiro caso nunca seria possível, criando assim, novas garantias de desempenho, menos gastos monetários e menores consumos de energia. Este último fator, apresentou-se desde cedo, como, talvez, a maior barreira de desenvolvimento de novos processadores na área uniprocessador, dado que, à medida que novos eram lançados para o mercado, ao mesmo tempo que ofereciam maior performance, foram levando ao conhecimento de um limite de geração de calor que obrigou ao surgimento da área multiprocessador. No futuro, espera-se que o número de processadores num determinado chip venha a aumentar, e como é óbvio, novas técnicas de exploração das suas inerentes vantagens têm de ser desenvolvidas, e a área relacionada com os algoritmos de escalonamento não é exceção. Ao longo dos anos, diferentes categorias de algoritmos multiprocessador para dar resposta a este problema têm vindo a ser desenvolvidos, destacando-se principalmente estes: globais, particionados e semi-particionados. A perspectiva global, supõe a existência de uma fila global que é acessível por todos os processadores disponíveis. Este fato torna disponível a migração de tarefas, isto é, é possível parar a execução de uma tarefa e resumir a sua execução num processador distinto. Num dado instante, num grupo de tarefas, m, as tarefas de maior prioridade são selecionadas para execução. Este tipo promete limites de utilização altos, a custo elevado de preempções/migrações de tarefas. Em contraste, os algoritmos particionados, colocam as tarefas em partições, e estas, são atribuídas a um dos processadores disponíveis, isto é, para cada processador, é atribuída uma partição. Por essa razão, a migração de tarefas não é possível, acabando por fazer com que o limite de utilização não seja tão alto quando comparado com o caso anterior, mas o número de preempções de tarefas decresce significativamente. O esquema semi-particionado, é uma resposta de caráter hibrido entre os casos anteriores, pois existem tarefas que são particionadas, para serem executadas exclusivamente por um grupo de processadores, e outras que são atribuídas a apenas um processador. Com isto, resulta uma solução que é capaz de distribuir o trabalho a ser realizado de uma forma mais eficiente e balanceada. Infelizmente, para todos estes casos, existe uma discrepância entre a teoria e a prática, pois acaba-se por se assumir conceitos que não são aplicáveis na vida real. Para dar resposta a este problema, é necessário implementar estes algoritmos de escalonamento em sistemas operativos reais e averiguar a sua aplicabilidade, para caso isso não aconteça, as alterações necessárias sejam feitas, quer a nível teórico quer a nível prá