Cohesive law estimation of adhesive joints in mode II condition

The adhesive bonding technique enables both weight and complexity reduction in structures that require some joining technique to be used on account of fabrication/component shape issues. Because of this, adhesive bonding is also one of the main repair methods for metal and composite structures by the strap and scarf configurations. The availability of strength prediction techniques for adhesive joints is essential for their generalized application and it can rely on different approaches, such as mechanics of materials, conventional fracture mechanics or damage mechanics. These two last techniques depend on the measurement of the fracture toughness (GC) of materials. Within the framework of damage mechanics, a valid option is the use of Cohesive Zone Modelling (CZM) coupled with Finite Element (FE) analyses. In this work, CZM laws for adhesive joints considering three adhesives with varying ductility were estimated. The End-Notched Flexure (ENF) test geometry was selected based on overall test simplicity and results accuracy. The adhesives Araldite® AV138, Araldite® 2015 and Sikaforce® 7752 were studied between high-strength aluminium adherends. Estimation of the CZM laws was carried out by an inverse methodology based on a curve fitting procedure, which enabled a precise estimation of the adhesive joints’ behaviour. The work allowed to conclude that a unique set of shear fracture toughness (GIIC) and shear cohesive strength (ts0) exists for each specimen that accurately reproduces the adhesive layer’ behaviour. With this information, the accurate strength prediction of adhesive joints in shear is made possible by CZM.

O acordo de Basileia II

Este trabalho evidencia a gestão do risco operacional e a importância da implementação de uma estrutura adequada de gestão de risco. De forma a contextualizar o tema foi abordado o conceito de risco e risco operacional e as várias categorias de risco e feito o enquadramento nos vários Acordos de Basileia. Enfocou-se em Basileia II que inovou tratando do risco operacional, até então esquecido. Neste ambito foram abordados os vários métodos de avaliação de risco: basico, standard e avançado. A temática está organizada de forma a que haja um fio condutor que culmina na gestão do risco apresentando as linhas orientadoras do BIS a esse respeito e um modelo de uma estrutura de gestão de risco. Por fim o exemplo do Banco Comercial Português que implementou a sua estrutura de gestão de risco tendo em conta as diretrizes de Basileia considerando métodos benchmark de gestão de risco.