Competitive analysis of static-priority partitioned scheduling on uniform multiprocessors

Consider the problem of scheduling a set of sporadically arriving tasks on a uniform multiprocessor with the goal of meeting deadlines. A processor p has the speed Sp. Tasks can be preempted but they cannot migrate between processors. On each processor, tasks are scheduled according to rate-monotonic. We propose an algorithm that can schedule all task sets that any other possible algorithm can schedule assuming that our algorithm is given processors that are √2 / √2−1 ≈ 3.41 times faster. No such guarantees are previously known for partitioned static-priority scheduling on uniform multiprocessors.

Global static-priority preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with utilization bound 38%

Consider the problem of scheduling real-time tasks on a multiprocessor with the goal of meeting deadlines. Tasks arrive sporadically and have implicit deadlines, that is, the deadline of a task is equal to its minimum inter-arrival time. Consider this problem to be solved with global static-priority scheduling. We present a priority-assignment scheme with the property that if at most 38% of the processing capacity is requested then all deadlines are met.

The utilization bound of static-priority preemptive partitioned multiprocessor scheduling is 50%

This paper studies static-priority preemptive scheduling on a multiprocessor using partitioned scheduling. We propose a new scheduling algorithm and prove that if the proposed algorithm is used and if less than 50% of the capacity is requested then all deadlines are met. It is known that for every static-priority multiprocessor scheduling algorithm, there is a task set that misses a deadline although the requested capacity is arbitrary close to 50%.

Real-time Task-Splitting scheduling algorithms framework

Nos dias de hoje, os sistemas de tempo real crescem em importância e complexidade. Mediante a passagem do ambiente uniprocessador para multiprocessador, o trabalho realizado no primeiro não é completamente aplicável no segundo, dado que o nível de complexidade difere, principalmente devido à existência de múltiplos processadores no sistema. Cedo percebeu-se, que a complexidade do problema não cresce linearmente com a adição destes. Na verdade, esta complexidade apresenta-se como uma barreira ao avanço científico nesta área que, para já, se mantém desconhecida, e isto testemunha-se, essencialmente no caso de escalonamento de tarefas. A passagem para este novo ambiente, quer se trate de sistemas de tempo real ou não, promete gerar a oportunidade de realizar trabalho que no primeiro caso nunca seria possível, criando assim, novas garantias de desempenho, menos gastos monetários e menores consumos de energia. Este último fator, apresentou-se desde cedo, como, talvez, a maior barreira de desenvolvimento de novos processadores na área uniprocessador, dado que, à medida que novos eram lançados para o mercado, ao mesmo tempo que ofereciam maior performance, foram levando ao conhecimento de um limite de geração de calor que obrigou ao surgimento da área multiprocessador. No futuro, espera-se que o número de processadores num determinado chip venha a aumentar, e como é óbvio, novas técnicas de exploração das suas inerentes vantagens têm de ser desenvolvidas, e a área relacionada com os algoritmos de escalonamento não é exceção. Ao longo dos anos, diferentes categorias de algoritmos multiprocessador para dar resposta a este problema têm vindo a ser desenvolvidos, destacando-se principalmente estes: globais, particionados e semi-particionados. A perspectiva global, supõe a existência de uma fila global que é acessível por todos os processadores disponíveis. Este fato torna disponível a migração de tarefas, isto é, é possível parar a execução de uma tarefa e resumir a sua execução num processador distinto. Num dado instante, num grupo de tarefas, m, as tarefas de maior prioridade são selecionadas para execução. Este tipo promete limites de utilização altos, a custo elevado de preempções/migrações de tarefas. Em contraste, os algoritmos particionados, colocam as tarefas em partições, e estas, são atribuídas a um dos processadores disponíveis, isto é, para cada processador, é atribuída uma partição. Por essa razão, a migração de tarefas não é possível, acabando por fazer com que o limite de utilização não seja tão alto quando comparado com o caso anterior, mas o número de preempções de tarefas decresce significativamente. O esquema semi-particionado, é uma resposta de caráter hibrido entre os casos anteriores, pois existem tarefas que são particionadas, para serem executadas exclusivamente por um grupo de processadores, e outras que são atribuídas a apenas um processador. Com isto, resulta uma solução que é capaz de distribuir o trabalho a ser realizado de uma forma mais eficiente e balanceada. Infelizmente, para todos estes casos, existe uma discrepância entre a teoria e a prática, pois acaba-se por se assumir conceitos que não são aplicáveis na vida real. Para dar resposta a este problema, é necessário implementar estes algoritmos de escalonamento em sistemas operativos reais e averiguar a sua aplicabilidade, para caso isso não aconteça, as alterações necessárias sejam feitas, quer a nível teórico quer a nível prá

The utilization bound of uniprocessor preemptive slack-monotonic scheduling is 50%

Consider the problem of scheduling a set of sporadically arriving implicit-deadline tasks to meet deadlines on a uniprocessor. Static-priority scheduling is considered using the slack-monotonic priority-assignment scheme. We prove that its utilization bound is 50%.

Efficient schedulability tests for real-time embedded systems with urgent routines

Task scheduling is one of the key mechanisms to ensure timeliness in embedded real-time systems. Such systems have often the need to execute not only application tasks but also some urgent routines (e.g. error-detection actions, consistency checkers, interrupt handlers) with minimum latency. Although fixed-priority schedulers such as Rate-Monotonic (RM) are in line with this need, they usually make a low processor utilization available to the system. Moreover, this availability usually decreases with the number of considered tasks. If dynamic-priority schedulers such as Earliest Deadline First (EDF) are applied instead, high system utilization can be guaranteed but the minimum latency for executing urgent routines may not be ensured. In this paper we describe a scheduling model according to which urgent routines are executed at the highest priority level and all other system tasks are scheduled by EDF. We show that the guaranteed processor utilization for the assumed scheduling model is at least as high as the one provided by RM for two tasks, namely 2(2√−1). Seven polynomial time tests for checking the system timeliness are derived and proved correct. The proposed tests are compared against each other and to an exact but exponential running time test.

Holistic Analysis for Fork-Join Distributed Tasks supported by the FTT-SE Protocol

11th IEEE World Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS 2015). 27 to 29, May, 2015, TII-SS-2: Scheduling and Performance Analysis. Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Slotted wiDom: schedulability analysis and its experimental validation

WiDom is a wireless prioritized medium access control protocol which offers a very large number of priority levels. Hence, it brings the potential to employ non-preemptive static-priority scheduling and schedulability analysis for a wireless channel assuming that the overhead of WiDom is modeled properly. One schedulability analysis for WiDom has already been proposed but recent research has created a new version of WiDom (we call it: Slotted WiDom) with lower overhead and for this version of WiDom no schedulability analysis exists. In this paper we propose a new schedulability analysis for slotted WiDom and extend it to work also for message streams with release jitter. We have performed experiments with an implementation of slotted WiDom on a real-world platform (MicaZ). We find that for each message stream, the maximum observed response time never exceeds the calculated response time and hence this corroborates our belief that our new scheduling theory is applicable in practice.

New schedulability analysis for WiDom

WiDom is a wireless prioritized medium access control (MAC) protocol which offers a very large number of priority levels. Hence, it brings the potential for employing non-preemptive static-priority scheduling and schedulability analysis for a wireless channel assuming that the overhead of WiDom is modeled properly. One schedulability analysis for WiDom has already been proposed but recent research has created a new version of WiDom with lower overhead (we call it: WiDom with a master node) and for this version of WiDom no schedulability analysis exists. Also, common to the previously proposed schedulability analyses for WiDom is that they cannot analyze message streams with release jitter. Therefore, in this paper we propose a new schedulability analysis for WiDom (with a master node). We also extend the WiDom analyses (with and without master node) to work also for message streams with release jitter.

WiDom: a dominance protocol for wireless medium access

In this paper, we address the problem of sharing a wireless channel among a set of sporadic message streams where a message stream issues transmission requests with real-time deadlines. We propose a collision-free wireless medium access control (MAC) protocol which implements static-priority scheduling, supports a large number of priority levels and is fully distributed. It is an adaptation to a wireless channel of the dominance protocol used in the CAN bus. But, unlike that protocol, our protocol does not require a node having the ability to receive an incoming bit from the channel while transmitting to the channel. The evaluation of the protocol with real embedded computing platforms is presented to show that the proposed protocol is in fact collision-free and prioritized. We measure the response times of our implementation and show that the response-time analysis developed for the protocol offers an upper bound on the response times.

Schedulability analysis of generalized multiframe traffic on multihop-networks comprising software-implemented ethernet switches

Consider a multihop network comprising Ethernet switches. The traffic is described with flows and each flow is characterized by its source node, its destination node, its route and parameters in the generalized multiframe model. Output queues on Ethernet switches are scheduled by static-priority scheduling and tasks executing on the processor in an Ethernet switch are scheduled by stride scheduling. We present schedulability analysis for this setting.

Implementation of a dominance protocol for wireless medium access

Consider the problem of scheduling sporadic message transmission requests with deadlines. For wired channels, this has been achieved successfully using the CAN bus. For wireless channels, researchers have recently proposed a similar solution; a collision-free medium access control (MAC) protocol that implements static-priority scheduling. Unfortunately no implementation has been reported, yet. We implement and evaluate it to find that the implementation indeed is collision-free and prioritized. This allows us to develop schedulability analysis for the implementation. We measure the response times of messages in our implementation and find that our new response-time analysis indeed offers an upper bound on the response times. This enables a new class of wireless real-time systems with timeliness guarantees for sporadic messages and it opens-up a new research area: schedulability analysis for wireless networks.

Collision-free prioritized medium access control in wireless networks with hidden nodes

We propose a collision-free medium access control (MAC) protocol, which implements static-priority scheduling and works in the presence of hidden nodes. The MAC protocol allows multiple masters and is fully distributed; it is an adaptation to a wireless channel of the dominance protocol used in the CAN bus. But unlike that protocol, our protocol does not require a node having the ability to sense the channel while transmitting to the channel. Our protocol is collision-free even in the presence of hidden nodes and it achieves this without synchronized clocks or out-of-band busy tones. In addition, the protocol is designed to ensure that many non-interfering nodes can transmit in parallel and it functions for both broadcast and unicast transmissions.

A framework for memory contention analysis in multi-core platforms

The last decade has witnessed a major shift towards the deployment of embedded applications on multi-core platforms. However, real-time applications have not been able to fully benefit from this transition, as the computational gains offered by multi-cores are often offset by performance degradation due to shared resources, such as main memory. To efficiently use multi-core platforms for real-time systems, it is hence essential to tightly bound the interference when accessing shared resources. Although there has been much recent work in this area, a remaining key problem is to address the diversity of memory arbiters in the analysis to make it applicable to a wide range of systems. This work handles diverse arbiters by proposing a general framework to compute the maximum interference caused by the shared memory bus and its impact on the execution time of the tasks running on the cores, considering different bus arbiters. Our novel approach clearly demarcates the arbiter-dependent and independent stages in the analysis of these upper bounds. The arbiter-dependent phase takes the arbiter and the task memory-traffic pattern as inputs and produces a model of the availability of the bus to a given task. Then, based on the availability of the bus, the arbiter-independent phase determines the worst-case request-release scenario that maximizes the interference experienced by the tasks due to the contention for the bus. We show that the framework addresses the diversity problem by applying it to a memory bus shared by a fixed-priority arbiter, a time-division multiplexing (TDM) arbiter, and an unspecified work-conserving arbiter using applications from the MediaBench test suite. We also experimentally evaluate the quality of the analysis by comparison with a state-of-the-art TDM analysis approach and consistently showing a considerable reduction in maximum interference.

Allocation of Parallel Real-Time Tasks in Distributed Multi-core Architectures supported by an FTT-SE Network

Distributed real-time systems such as automotive applications are becoming larger and more complex, thus, requiring the use of more powerful hardware and software architectures. Furthermore, those distributed applications commonly have stringent real-time constraints. This implies that such applications would gain in flexibility if they were parallelized and distributed over the system. In this paper, we consider the problem of allocating fixed-priority fork-join Parallel/Distributed real-time tasks onto distributed multi-core nodes connected through a Flexible Time Triggered Switched Ethernet network. We analyze the system requirements and present a set of formulations based on a constraint programming approach. Constraint programming allows us to express the relations between variables in the form of constraints. Our approach is guaranteed to find a feasible solution, if one exists, in contrast to other approaches based on heuristics. Furthermore, approaches based on constraint programming have shown to obtain solutions for these type of formulations in reasonable time.