7 resultados para talent pools
em Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal
Resumo:
Fungal contamination of air in 10 gymnasiums with swimming pools was monitored. Fifty air samples of 200 L each were collected, using a Millipore air tester, from the area surrounding the pool, in training studios, in showers and changing rooms for both sexes, and also, outside premises, since these are the places regarded as reference. Simultaneously, environmental parameters – temperature and humidity – were also monitored. Some 25 different species of fungi were identified. The six most commonly isolated genera were the following: Cladosporium sp. (36.6%), Penicillium sp. (19.0%), Aspergillus sp. (10.2%), Mucor sp. (7%), Phoma sp. and Chrysonilia sp. (3.3%). For yeasts, three different genera were identified, namely, Rhodotorula sp. (70%), Trichosporon mucoides and Cryptococcus uniguttulattus (10%).
Resumo:
ABSTRACT - Tinea pedis and onychomycosis are two rather diverse clinical manifestations of superficial fungal infections, and their etiologic agents may be dermatophytes, non-dermatophyte moulds or yeasts. This study was designed to statistically describe the data obtained as results of analysis conducted during a four year period on the frequency of Tinea pedis and onychomycosis and their etiologic agents. A questionnaire was distributed from 2006 to 2010 and answered by 186 patients, who were subjected to skin and/or nail sampling. Frequencies of the isolated fungal species were cross-linked with the data obtained with the questionnaire, seeking associations and predisposing factors. One hundred and sixty three fungal isolates were obtained, 24.2% of which composed by more than one fungal species. Most studies report the two pathologies as caused primarily by dermatophytes, followed by yeasts and lastly by non-dermatophytic moulds. Our study does not challenge this trend. We found a frequency of 15.6% of infections caused by dermatophytes (with a total of 42 isolates) of which T. rubrum was the most frequent species (41.4%). There was no significant association (p >0.05) among visible injury and the independent variables tested, namely age, gender, owning pet, education, swimming pools attendance, sports activity and clinical information. Unlike other studies, the variables considered did not show the expected influence on dermatomycosis of the lower limbs. It is hence necessary to conduct further studies to specifically identify which variables do in fact influence such infections.
Resumo:
Nalgumas áreas curriculares disciplinares, como o Teatro, as aprendizagens e as competências não se adquirem nem desenvolvem, em geral, de acordo com a díade de estratégias que os professores parecem privilegiar, isto é: transmissão do conhecimento e, pouco depois, confirmação – na maioria das vezes através da modalidade de escrita – da aprendizagem desse conhecimento pelos alunos. Note-se, porém, que, mesmo naquelas áreas que os responsáveis políticos distinguem com um “exame nacional”, como o Português, nem todas as aprendizagens promovidas e realizadas são testáveis numa prova escrita e no imediato (como, a título de exemplo, as que se inscrevem nos domínios da comunicação oral e da leitura em voz alta, também amplamente abordadas em Teatro). Às áreas da educação artística, e do Teatro em particular, os professores associam essencialmente – ou exclusivamente – a criatividade, a imaginação e a expressividade. Sendo, embora, competências potencialmente desenvolvidas e avaliadas também nas áreas da educação artística, não são um exclusivo destas áreas. Cada área curricular disciplinar do âmbito da educação artística – e o Teatro não é exceção – assenta numa específica linguagem artística, que integra conteúdos, estratégias, atividades, recursos, técnicas, conceitos e terminologias próprios, que as crianças, com vista ao seu desenvolvimento completo e harmonioso, têm o direito de aprender e desenvolver. Daqui decorrem algumas questões: O que – e como – avaliar nas áreas da educação artística, em particular no Teatro? Que princípios poderão estar inerentes a um dispositivo de avaliação em Teatro, em contexto curricular? Terão as modalidades de avaliação não escrita estatuto de fiabilidade? O binómio teatro/currículo encerra um paradoxo a que pretendemos dar atenção: embora nem sempre abordado com regularidade e seguindo uma lógica dedesenvolvimento curricular, o Teatro constitui, apesar disso, uma das estratégias privilegiadas pelos professores de participação em projetos e iniciativas formais, na maior parte das vezes de cariz pontual (como momentos festivos ou de apresentação à comunidade), em que os alunos são sujeitos ao juízo avaliativo dos públicos. Partindo dos princípios de que (i) em contexto curricular cada atividade tem uma intencionalidade e que (ii) a “educação” artística não visa a identificação ou a valorização de “talentos”, pretendemos defender a seguinte ideia: Só depois de estabelecermos inequivocamente os objetivos da nossa ação educativa-pedagógica e, por conseguinte, uma estratégia de avaliação, é que podemos definir um percurso com sentido. Esta comunicação de natureza teórica, cuja base reflexiva decorre de mais de vinte anos de intervenção em contextos escolares, tanto do ensino básico como de formação de professores, tentará formular questões e problematizar algumas linhas de pensamento, mais do que encontrar respostas, no sentido de suscitar, principalmente da parte dos professores, a necessidade de uma mudança de atitude e de práticas face ao teatro na escola.
Resumo:
The electricity industry throughout the world, which has long been dominated by vertically integrated utilities, has experienced major changes. Deregulation, unbundling, wholesale and retail wheeling, and real-time pricing were abstract concepts a few years ago. Today market forces drive the price of electricity and reduce the net cost through increased competition. As power markets continue to evolve, there is a growing need for advanced modeling approaches. This article addresses the challenge of maximizing the profit (or return) of power producers through the optimization of their share of customers. Power producers have fixed production marginal costs and decide the quantity of energy to sell in both day-ahead markets and a set of target clients, by negotiating bilateral contracts involving a three-rate tariff. Producers sell energy by considering the prices of a reference week and five different types of clients with specific load profiles. They analyze several tariffs and determine the best share of customers, i.e., the share that maximizes profit. © 2014 IEEE.
Resumo:
Mestrado em Gestão e Empreendedorismo
Resumo:
Electricity markets are systems for effecting the purchase and sale of electricity using supply and demand to set energy prices. Two major market models are often distinguished: pools and bilateral contracts. Pool prices tend to change quickly and variations are usually highly unpredictable. In this way, market participants often enter into bilateral contracts to hedge against pool price volatility. This article addresses the challenge of optimizing the portfolio of clients managed by trader agents. Typically, traders buy energy in day-ahead markets and sell it to a set of target clients, by negotiating bilateral contracts involving three-rate tariffs. Traders sell energy by considering the prices of a reference week and five different types of clients. They analyze several tariffs and determine the best share of customers, i.e., the share that maximizes profit. © 2014 IEEE.
Resumo:
The electricity industry throughout the world, which has long been dominated by vertically integrated utilities, has experienced major changes. Deregulation, unbundling, wholesale and retail wheeling, and real-time pricing were abstract concepts a few years ago. Today market forces drive the price of electricity and reduce the net cost through increased competition. As power markets continue to evolve, there is a growing need for advanced modeling approaches. This article addresses the challenge of maximizing the profit (or return) of power producers through the optimization of their share of customers. Power producers have fixed production marginal costs and decide the quantity of energy to sell in both day-ahead markets and a set of target clients, by negotiating bilateral contracts involving a three-rate tariff. Producers sell energy by considering the prices of a reference week and five different types of clients with specific load profiles. They analyze several tariffs and determine the best share of customers, i.e., the share that maximizes profit. © 2014 IEEE.