1 resultado para self-reflection
em Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (5)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (11)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (1)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (11)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (34)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (64)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (12)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (721)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
The article starts by illustrating how children’s right to participation comes to the fore in legal documents regulating the field of early childhood education in Norway. Issues regarding the views of children, understanding of democracy and of play, which influence how this right is realised in early childhood practice, are taken as a point of departure to discuss possible pitfalls. Based on analyses from an in-depth qualitative study in two Norwegian kindergartens (children aged three to six), two examples are presented to argue an understanding of children’s participation which include more than individualistic choice routines. The article is rounded off by taking a critical look at conceptualisations used in early childhood practice and research, arguing that there is a need for critical self- reflection amongst researchers in the field