1 resultado para response function
em Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (9)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (44)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (34)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (20)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (67)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (13)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (18)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (59)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (34)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (46)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (13)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (11)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (54)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (82)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (12)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (67)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (57)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (73)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (20)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (7)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (13)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (34)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
Purpose - In this study we aim to validate a method to assess the impact of reduced visual function and observer performance concurrently with a nodule detection task. Materials and methods - Three consultant radiologists completed a nodule detection task under three conditions: without visual defocus (0.00 Dioptres; D), and with two different magnitudes of visual defocus (−1.00 D and −2.00 D). Defocus was applied with lenses and visual function was assessed prior to each image evaluation. Observers evaluated the same cases on each occasion; this comprised of 50 abnormal cases containing 1–4 simulated nodules (5, 8, 10 and 12 mm spherical diameter, 100 HU) placed within a phantom, and 25 normal cases (images containing no nodules). Data was collected under the free-response paradigm and analysed using Rjafroc. A difference in nodule detection performance would be considered significant at p < 0.05. Results - All observers had acceptable visual function prior to beginning the nodule detection task. Visual acuity was reduced to an unacceptable level for two observers when defocussed to −1.00 D and for one observer when defocussed to −2.00 D. Stereoacuity was unacceptable for one observer when defocussed to −2.00 D. Despite unsatisfactory visual function in the presence of defocus we were unable to find a statistically significant difference in nodule detection performance (F(2,4) = 3.55, p = 0.130). Conclusion - A method to assess visual function and observer performance is proposed. In this pilot evaluation we were unable to detect any difference in nodule detection performance when using lenses to reduce visual function.