Consumo de benzodiazepinas por idosos institucionalizados: inapropriação, qualidade de sono e contributo para a segurança na medicação

A racionalização do uso de medicamentos constitui-se como um fator contribuinte para a melhoria da segurança do doente, particularmente no que respeita à segurança na medicação, tendo-se tornado prioritária para as organizações e instituições de saúde. A avaliação do uso de medicamentos inapropriados no idoso constitui-se como uma medida que concorre para evitar, prevenir ou corrigir eventos adversos associados ao seu uso. As benzodiazepinas são uma das classes de medicamentos mais prescritas em idosos. No entanto, e apesar de sua utilidade clínica, algumas benzodiazepinas são consideradas inapropriadas nesta faixa etária por potenciarem o efeito sedativo e aumentar a incidência de quedas e fraturas. A longo prazo, na promoção da qualidade do sono, a sua efetividade é discutível já que a toma de uma benzodiazepina para a resolução de um problema como o sono, muitas vezes pontual, passa a ser um problema crónico de exigência de toma contínua, sem que a qualidade deste seja restabelecida, pondo em risco a segurança do doente. Este estudo tem como objetivo caracterizar o consumo de benzodiazepinas por idosos institucionalizados, numa instituição de longa permanência do concelho de Sesimbra, sua inapropriação e a relação com a qualidade de sono. Foi desenvolvido um estudo descritivo e transversal, assente no paradigma qualitativo, com a recolha de dados a decorrer em três momentos: registo de informação em grelha própria da caracterização sociodemográfica e da caracterização do consumo de benzodiazepinas; aplicação do índice de Katz para determinar a funcionalidade dos participantes; aplicação do questionário adaptado do Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index para avaliação da qualidade do sono. A inapropriação foi avaliada pela aplicação dos critérios de Beers. Após aplicação dos critérios de inclusão (idade superior a 65 anos e capacidade funcional) aos 97 utentes da instituição, a amostra foi constituída por 51 utentes. Foi recolhido consentimento informado de todos os participantes. Os resultados obtidos mostram que 46% das benzodiazepinas consumidas são de duração intermédia de ação, observando-se ainda um valor considerável de consumo de benzodiazepinas de longa duração de ação (36%). Estes valores correspondem a um grau elevado de inapropriação, potenciando os riscos para a segurança do doente nesta faixa etária. O lorazepam 2,5mg é a benzodiazepina mais utilizada como hipnótico. Mas, apesar do consumo deste grupo de medicamentos 81,6% dos idosos que consumem benzodiazepinas não apresentam boa qualidade de sono (PSQI>5), enquanto 77% dos idosos que não consomem benzodiazepinas apresentam boa qualidade de sono (PSQI≤5). Nos idosos que consomem benzodiazepinas, a média de tempo despendido na cama até adormecer foi de cerca de 55 minutos, valor superior ao grupo que não consome benzodiazepinas, onde a média é de 27 minutos. Neste grupo de idosos, o consumo de benzodiazepinas não só é inapropriado como não contribuiu para uma melhoria na qualidade de sono nem para a segurança do doente, como são os consumidores de benzodiazepinas que apresentam uma pior qualidade de sono, nas suas várias dimensões.

The hospital survey on patient safety culture in Portuguese hospitals: instrument validity and reliability

Purpose – Quantitative instruments to assess patient safety culture have been developed recently and a few review articles have been published. Measuring safety culture enables healthcare managers and staff to improve safety behaviours and outcomes for patients and staff. The study aims to determine the AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) Portuguese version's validity and reliability. Design/methodology/approach – A missing-value analysis and item analysis was performed to identify problematic items. Reliability analysis, inter-item correlations and inter-scale correlations were done to check internal consistency, composite scores. Inter-correlations were examined to assess construct validity. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to investigate the observed data's fit to the dimensional structure proposed in the AHRQ HSPSC Portuguese version. To analyse differences between hospitals concerning composites scores, an ANOVA analysis and multiple comparisons were done. Findings – Eight of 12 dimensions had Cronbach's alphas higher than 0.7. The instrument as a whole achieved a high Cronbach's alpha (0.91). Inter-correlations showed that there is no dimension with redundant items, however dimension 10 increased its internal consistency when one item is removed. Originality/value – This study is the first to evaluate an American patient safety culture survey using Portuguese data. The survey has satisfactory reliability and construct validity.

A checklist for patient safety rounds at the care pathway level

Objective - To define a checklist that can be used to assess the performance of a department and evaluate the implementation of quality management (QM) activities across departments or pathways in acute care hospitals. Design - We developed and tested a checklist for the assessment of QM activities at department level in a cross-sectional study using on-site visits by trained external auditors. Setting and Participants - A sample of 292 hospital departments of 74 acute care hospitals across seven European countries. In every hospital, four departments for the conditions: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, hip fracture and deliveries participated. Main outcome measures - Four measures of QM activities were evaluated at care pathway level focusing on specialized expertise and responsibility (SER), evidence-based organization of pathways (EBOP), patient safety strategies and clinical review (CR). Results - Participating departments attained mean values on the various scales between 1.2 and 3.7. The theoretical range was 0-4. Three of the four QM measures are identical for the four conditions, whereas one scale (EBOP) has condition-specific items. Correlations showed that every factor was related, but also distinct, and added to the overall picture of QM at pathway level. Conclusion - The newly developed checklist can be used across various types of departments and pathways in acute care hospitals like AMI, deliveries, stroke and hip fracture. The anticipated users of the checklist are internal (e.g. peers within the hospital and hospital executive board) and external auditors (e.g. healthcare inspectorate, professional or patient organizations).

X Radiation dose implications in screening patients with ferromagnetic IOFBs prior to MRI: a literary review

Patients scheduled for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan sometimes require screening for ferromagnetic Intra Orbital Foreign Bodies (IOFBs). To assess this, they are required to fill out a screening protocol questionnaire before their scan. If it is established that a patient is at high risk, radiographic imaging is necessary. This review examines literature to evaluate which imaging modality should be used to screen for IOFBs, considering that the eye is highly sensitive to ionising radiation and any dose should be minimised. Method: Several websites and books were searched for information, these were as follows: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar. The terms searched related to IOFB, Ionising radiation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety, Image Quality, Effective Dose, Orbits and X-ray. Thirty five articles were found, several were rejected due to age or irrelevance; twenty eight were eventually accepted. Results: There are several imaging techniques that can be used. Some articles investigated the use of ultrasound for investigation of ferromagnetic IOFBs of the eye and others discussed using Computed Tomography (CT) and X-ray. Some gaps in the literature were identified, mainly that there are no articles which discuss the lowest effective dose while having adequate image quality for orbital imaging. Conclusion: X-ray is the best method to identify IOFBs. The only problem is that there is no research which highlights exposure factors that maintain sufficient image quality for viewing IOFBs and keep the effective dose to the eye As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).

Medication regimen complexity in institutionalized elderly people in an aging society

Background: Complex medication regimens may adversely affect compliance and treatment outcomes. Complexity can be assessed with the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI), which has proved to be a valid, reliable tool, with potential uses in both practice and research. Objective: To use the MRCI to assess medication regimen complexity in institutionalized elderly people. Setting: Five nursing homes in mainland Portugal. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study of institutionalized elderly people (n = 415) was performed from March to June 2009, including all inpatients aged 65 and over taking at least one medication per day. Main outcome measure: Medication regimen complexity index. Results: The mean age of the sample was 83.9 years (±6.6 years), and 60.2 % were women. The elderly patients were taking a large number of drugs, with 76.6 % taking more than five medications per day. The average medication regimen complexity was 18.2 (±SD = 9.6), and was higher in the females (p < 0.001). The most decisive factors contributing to the complexity were the number of drugs and dosage frequency. In regimens with the same number of medications, schedule was the most relevant factor in the final score (r = 0.922), followed by pharmaceutical forms (r = 0.768) and additional instructions (r = 0.742). Conclusion: Medication regimen complexity proved to be high. There is certainly potential for the pharmacist's intervention to reduce it as part as the medication review routine in all the patients.