An experimental study to compare the interface pressure and experience of healthy participants when lying still for 20 minutes in a supine position on two different imaging surfaces

Introduction: Pressure ulcers are a high cost, high volume issue for health and medical care providers, affecting patients’ recovery and psychological wellbeing. The current research of support surfaces on pressure as a risk factor in the development of pressure ulcers is not relevant to the specialised, controlled environment of the radiological setting. Method: 38 healthy participants aged 19-51 were placed supine on two different imaging surfaces. The XSENSOR pressure mapping system was used to measure the interface pressure. Data was acquired over a time of 20 minutes preceded by 6 minutes settling time to reduce measurement error. Qualitative information regarding participants’ opinion on pain and comfort was recorded using a questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22. Results: Data was collected from 30 participants aged 19 to 51 (mean 25.77, SD 7.72), BMI from 18.7 to 33.6 (mean 24.12, SD 3.29), for two surfaces, following eight participant exclusions due to technical faults. Total average pressure, average pressure for jeopardy areas (head, sacrum & heels) and peak pressure for jeopardy areas were calculated as interface pressure in mmHg. Qualitative data showed that a significant difference in experiences of comfort and pain was found in the jeopardy areas (P<0.05) between the two surfaces. Conclusion: A significant difference is seen in average pressure between the two surfaces. Pain and comfort data also show a significant difference between the surfaces, both findings support the proposal for further investigation into the effects of radiological surfaces as a risk factor for the formation of pressure ulcers.

Verificação dos desvios de setup e cálculo de margem de PTV em tumores de próstata com 3DCRT

Mestrado em Radioterapia

O efeito de um programa de fisioterapia na estabilização do prematuro

O número de bebés que nascem prematuros tem vindo a aumentar. É indiscutível a importância dos avanços tecnológicos e da pesquisa nas Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos de Neonatologia (UCIN), sendo essencial o papel desempenhado pelos fisioterapeutas nos cuidados prestados a estes bebés. As suas potencialidades só se desenvolvem na medida em que o bebé encontra estimulação e posicionamento adequado. Realizou‑se um estudo piloto na UCIN do Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte (CHLN), no período de julho de 2011 a março de 2012, em que se pretendeu avaliar o efeito de um programa de fisioterapia na estabilização do prematuro. Este programa consistiu em posicionar o prematuro em decúbito dorsal, lateral direito e lateral esquerdo e decúbito ventral, permanecendo em cada posição 5 minutos. O objetivo foi avaliar, durante a permanência do bebé na UCIN, a alteração nos seguintes parâmetros: frequência cardíaca (FC) e saturação de oxigénio (SatO2), antes e depois do tratamento. A amostra por conveniência incluiu no estudo 30 bebés prematuros, sendo 13 do género feminino e 17 do género masculino, que obedeceram a critérios específicos de inclusão. Para verificar as variáveis fisiológicas FC e SatO2 foi utilizado um Oxímetro de Pulso BCI 3401. Verificou‑se que a FC diminui e a SatO2 aumentou entre a primeira avaliação e a segunda avaliação, para a amostra total, assim como para os sujeitos do género feminino e os sujeitos do género masculino, para α = 0,05 e valor p≤0,001. Contudo, a diferença entre as médias dos dois momentos de avaliação da FC e da SatO2, em função do género, não revelaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas. Em conclusão, o estudo sugere que o programa de fisioterapia promove a melhoria da SatO2 e diminuição da FC, promovendo uma melhoria da estabilização do prematuro.

The effects of clinical support surfaces on pressure as a risk factor in the development of pressure ulcers, from a radiographical perspective: a narrative literature review

Purpose: Pressure ulcers are a high cost, high volume issue for health and medical care providers, having a detrimental effect on patients and relatives. Pressure ulcer prevention is widely covered in the literature, but little has been published regarding the risk to patients in the radiographical setting. This review of the current literature is to identify findings relevant to radiographical context. Methods: Literature searching was performed using Science Direct and Medline databases. The search was limited to articles published in the last ten years to remain current and excluded studies containing participants less than 17 years of age. In total 14 studies were acquired; three were excluded as they were not relevant. The remaining 11 studies were compared and reviewed. Discussion: Eight of the studies used ‘healthy’ participants and three used symptomatic participants. Nine studies explored interface pressure with a range of pressure mat technologies, two studies measured shear (MRI finite element modelling, and a non-invasive instrument), and one looked at blood flow and haemoglobin oxygenation. A range of surfaces were considered from trauma, nursing and surgical backgrounds for their ability to reduce pressure including standard mattresses, high specification mattresses, rigid and soft layer spine boards, various overlays (gel, air filled, foam). Conclusion: The current literature is not appropriate for the radiographic patient and cannot be extrapolated to a radiologic context. Sufficient evidence is presented in this review to support the need for further work specific to radiography in order to minimise the development of PU in at risk patients.