A comunicação online das organizações culturais. A utilização de novas ferramentas pelas companhias de teatro de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo de 2000 a 2013

Nos dias de hoje, ferramentas como o Facebook, o Twitter e o YouTube fazem parte do quotidiano. Desde o recente virar do século até ao presente, a sociedade transformou-se. Usamos cada vez mais a Internet. Nela pesquisamos informação e partilhamos conteúdos, sejam eles textos, fotos ou vídeos. As novas ferramentas de comunicação online trouxeram uma maior interatividade entre aquele que emite uma mensagem e aquele que a recebe. Nesta investigação procura-se analisar quais e como é que as novas ferramentas de comunicação online são utilizadas pelas organizações culturais, nomeadamente, pelas companhias de teatro de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo, entre 2000 e 2013. Ao longo do enquadramento teórico são abordadas questões como a comunicação das organizações, a comunicação online das mesmas, a utilização das novas ferramentas online por parte de companhias de teatro e o que são considerados sites, media sociais e redes sociais. Entre várias referências, serão citados Grunig e Hunt (1984) que apresentam o modelo de comunicação de dois sentidos simétricos, assim como Phillips e Young (2009) que abordam as diferentes ferramentas de comunicação online. São ainda apresentados estudos relativos à utilização destas ferramentas por parte das organizações artísticas, elaborados pela MTM London (2009) e pelo Australia Council for the Arts (2011). A presente investigação tem por base a observação e acompanhamento das ferramentas de comunicação online utilizadas pelas companhias de teatro, inquéritos aos produtores dessas companhias e entrevistas a alguns dos seus diretores. Com este trabalho pretende-se verificar que ferramentas estão a ser utilizadas pelas companhias, com que regularidade, quem nas companhias gere essas ferramentas, quais as vantagens percecionadas, entre outros aspetos.

The 27th British liquid crystal society annual meeting 2013, Cambridge

Attending the British Liquid Crystal Society’s (BLCS) Annual Meeting was a formative experience in my days as a PhD student, starting way back in the 1990s. At that time, this involved travelling to (to me) exotic parts of the United Kingdom, such as Reading, Oxford or Manchester, away from Southampton where I was based. Some postdoctoral years in a different country followed, and three BLCS Meetings were missed, until in 1997 and 1998, I was able to attend again, in Southampton and Leeds, respectively. Not much had changed from my student days, the size and the format were still about the same, many of the leading characters were still around, and the closing talk would still be given by John Lydon. Well, at some point, I got myself a proper academic job on the Continent and stopped attending BLCS Annual Meetings altogether. The fond memories of my youth started to fade. Were the Meetings still on? It seemed so, as old friends and acquaintances would occasionally recount attending them, and even winning prizes at them. But, it all seemed rather remote now. Until, that is, it came to pass that the 27th BLCS Meeting would be held in Selwyn College, Cambridge, just down (or up, depending on how you look at it) the road from the Isaac Newton Institute, where I was spending part of my sabbatical leave. The opportunity to resume attendance could not be missed. A brief e-mail exchange with the organisers, and a cheque to cover the fee, duly secured this. And thus, it was with trepidation that I approached my first BLCS Annual Meeting in more than a decade.

Spanish society's perceptions about socially responsible investing

The debate surrounding the financial needs of investors and the impact on society of investment is considered to be an important research topic due to the growth of socially responsible financial markets. The objective of this research is to study the perception of the Spanish public about socially responsible investing (SRI) criteria and real-life investment needs. To examine the Spanish perception of SRI, we conducted a field survey. The results show that SRI is in an early stage and Spanish investors need more exact information regarding social, environmental, and governance criteria in order to invest in socially responsible companies and products.

Medication regimen complexity in institutionalized elderly people in an aging society

Background: Complex medication regimens may adversely affect compliance and treatment outcomes. Complexity can be assessed with the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI), which has proved to be a valid, reliable tool, with potential uses in both practice and research. Objective: To use the MRCI to assess medication regimen complexity in institutionalized elderly people. Setting: Five nursing homes in mainland Portugal. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study of institutionalized elderly people (n = 415) was performed from March to June 2009, including all inpatients aged 65 and over taking at least one medication per day. Main outcome measure: Medication regimen complexity index. Results: The mean age of the sample was 83.9 years (±6.6 years), and 60.2 % were women. The elderly patients were taking a large number of drugs, with 76.6 % taking more than five medications per day. The average medication regimen complexity was 18.2 (±SD = 9.6), and was higher in the females (p < 0.001). The most decisive factors contributing to the complexity were the number of drugs and dosage frequency. In regimens with the same number of medications, schedule was the most relevant factor in the final score (r = 0.922), followed by pharmaceutical forms (r = 0.768) and additional instructions (r = 0.742). Conclusion: Medication regimen complexity proved to be high. There is certainly potential for the pharmacist's intervention to reduce it as part as the medication review routine in all the patients.