Amplificação em imunohistoquímica: estudo comparativo de sistemas de polímeros

Desde o início da utilização da imunohistoquímica em anatomia patológica, um dos objetivos tem sido detetar as quantidades mais ínfimas de antigénio, tornando-o visível ao microscópio ótico. Vários sistemas de amplificação têm sido aplicados de forma a concretizar este objetivo, tendo surgido um grupo genérico de métodos simples e que apresentam uma amplificação superior: são os denominados métodos do polímero indireto. Tendo em conta a variedade de métodos disponíveis, o autor propõe-se a comparar a qualidade de quatro sistemas de amplificação, que recorrem ao método do polímero indireto com horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Foram utilizadas lâminas de diferentes tecidos, fixados em formol e incluídos em parafina, nos quais se procedeu à identificação de 15 antigénios distintos. Na amplificação recorreu-se a quatro sistemas de polímero indireto (Dako EnVision+ System – K4006; LabVision UltraVision LP Detection System – TL-004-HD; Leica NovoLink – RE7140-k; Vector ImmPRESS Reagent Kit – MP-7402). A observação microscópica e classificação da imunomarcação obtida foram feitas com base num algoritmo que enquadra intensidade, marcação específica, marcação inespecífica e contraste, num score global que pode tomar valores entre 0 e 25. No tratamento dos dados, para além da estatística descritiva, foi utilizado o teste one-way ANOVA com posthoc de tukey (alfa=0.05). O melhor resultado obtido, em termos de par média/desvio-padrão, dos scores globais foi o do NovoLink (22,4/2,37) e o pior foi o do EnVision+ (17,43/3,86). Verificou-se ainda que existe diferença estatística entre os resultados obtidos pelo sistema NovoLink e os sistemas UltraVision (p=.004), ImmPRESS (p=.000) e EnVision+ (p=.000). Concluiu-se que o sistema que permitiu a obtenção de melhores resultados, neste estudo, foi o Leica NovoLink.

Oncology research and clinical decisions based on immunohistochemistry: the importance of the technical aspects that support a complex method

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the group of techniques that use antibodies as specific reagents to identify and demonstrate several cell and tissue components that are antigens. This linking allows locating and identifying the in situ presence of various substances by means of color that is associated with the formed antigen-antibody complexes. The practical value of this biotechnology area, widely used in Pathology and Oncology, in diagnostic, prognostic, theranostic and research context, results from the possibility of combining a colour marker with an antibody without causing any damage to specific binding established between antibody and antigen. This provides the microscopic observation of the target locations where the antibody and hence the antigen are present. IHC is presented as a powerful means for identification of several cellular and tissue structures that can be associated with pathologies, and of the consequences, at functional and morphological level, of these same elements action.

Relation between DNA damage measured by comet assay and OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism in antineoplastic drugs biomonitoring

Antineoplastic drugs are hazardous chemical agents used mostly in the treatment of patients with cancer, however health professionals that handle and administer these drugs can become exposed and develop DNA damage. Comet assay is a standard method for assessing DNA damage in human biomonitoring and, combined with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) enzyme, it specifically detects DNA oxidative damage. The aim of this study was to investigate genotoxic effects in workers occupationally exposed to cytostatics (n = 46), as compared to a control group with no exposure (n = 46) at two Portuguese hospitals, by means of the alkaline comet assay. The potential of the OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism as a susceptibility biomarker was also investigated. Exposure was evaluated by investigating the contamination of surfaces and genotoxic assessment was done by alkaline comet assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes. OGG1 Ser326Cys (rs1052133) polymorphism was studied by Real Time PCR. As for exposure assessment, there were 121 (37%) positive samples out of a total of 327 samples analysed from both hospitals. No statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney test, p > 0.05) were found between subjects with and without exposure, regarding DNA damage and oxidative DNA damage, nevertheless the exposed group exhibited higher values. Moreover, there was no consistent trend regarding the variation of both biomarkers as assessed by comet assay with OGG1 polymorphism. Our study was not statistically significant regarding occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs and genetic damage assessed by comet assay. However, health professionals should be monitored for risk behaviour, in order to ensure that safety measures are applied and protection devices are used correctly.