1 resultado para Language and education.
em Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (24)
- Aston University Research Archive (33)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (44)
- Brock University, Canada (16)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (80)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (9)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (27)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (14)
- Digital Archives@Colby (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (15)
- Digital Peer Publishing (9)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (9)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (9)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (21)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (15)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (8)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (5)
- Universidad de Alicante (12)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (8)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (7)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (19)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (160)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (82)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- University of Washington (7)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The aim of this article is to present the results of an action research project, which has been put into practice in Primary Education. This project was intended to develop students’ textual competence, considering both comprehension and textual production. Our starting hypothesis was that teaching the schematisation of text types, focusing on linguistic devices that underlie text production, would promote the development of textual competence, leading to the production of more coherent and cohesive texts. In order to test this hypothesis we implemented the project in three phases. First, before the intervention, we collected texts produced by the students. Secondly, we implemented a didactic program designed to develop students’ textual competence. Lastly, after the intervention, we collected students’ texts once again. Data was analyzed according to categories that confer cohesion and coherence to different types of texts. Narrative, descriptive, and explanatory texts were assessed in terms of 1) building an autonomous text; 2) hierarchisation of information, and 3) textual organisation. Overall, results indicate that students developed their text conceptualisations, their understanding of the different structures of texts, and produced better writing. Indeed, their written work shows a marked progression from the beginning of the intervention program to the end of the program.